Conversation
Closed
2 tasks
Contributor
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte (1)
566-572: LGTM! Consider handling edge cases and using precise truncation.The implementation successfully addresses the PR objectives by showing truncated amounts with tooltips. However, consider these improvements:
- {#if request.formattedAmount.includes(".") && request.formattedAmount.split(".")[1].length > 5} - <Tooltip text={request.formattedAmount}> - {Number(request.formattedAmount).toFixed(5)} - </Tooltip> + {#if request?.formattedAmount?.includes(".") && request.formattedAmount.split(".")[1].length > 5} + <Tooltip text={request.formattedAmount}> + {request.formattedAmount.slice(0, request.formattedAmount.indexOf(".") + 6)} + </Tooltip>This refactor:
- Adds null-safety checks to prevent runtime errors
- Uses string slicing instead of
toFixed()to avoid rounding, ensuring exact truncation
aimensahnoun
approved these changes
Nov 19, 2024
sstefdev
deleted the
159-invoice-dashboard-reduce-expected-amount-to-5-decimals-add-tooltip-showing-full-precision
branch
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes PR
Problem
The "Expected Amount" field in the Invoice Dashboard currently displays values with full precision. This can result in excessively long and unwieldy numbers, negatively affecting readability and user experience.
Proposed Solution
Changes Made
Summary by CodeRabbit