Skip to content

Comments

fix: message parser being slow to process very long messages with too many symbols#33257

Merged
kodiakhq[bot] merged 1 commit intorelease-6.9.7from
backport-6.9.7-33227
Sep 11, 2024
Merged

fix: message parser being slow to process very long messages with too many symbols#33257
kodiakhq[bot] merged 1 commit intorelease-6.9.7from
backport-6.9.7-33227

Conversation

@dionisio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@dionisio-bot dionisio-bot bot commented Sep 11, 2024

Backport of #33227

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Sep 11, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: bc0af79

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 34 packages
Name Type
@rocket.chat/message-parser Patch
@rocket.chat/peggy-loader Patch
@rocket.chat/meteor Patch
@rocket.chat/core-services Patch
@rocket.chat/core-typings Patch
@rocket.chat/gazzodown Patch
@rocket.chat/livechat Patch
@rocket.chat/rest-typings Patch
rocketchat-services Patch
@rocket.chat/account-service Patch
@rocket.chat/authorization-service Patch
@rocket.chat/ddp-streamer Patch
@rocket.chat/omnichannel-transcript Patch
@rocket.chat/presence-service Patch
@rocket.chat/queue-worker Patch
@rocket.chat/stream-hub-service Patch
@rocket.chat/omnichannel-services Patch
@rocket.chat/presence Patch
@rocket.chat/apps Patch
@rocket.chat/cron Patch
@rocket.chat/fuselage-ui-kit Patch
@rocket.chat/model-typings Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-contexts Patch
@rocket.chat/api-client Patch
@rocket.chat/license Patch
@rocket.chat/pdf-worker Patch
@rocket.chat/ddp-client Patch
@rocket.chat/uikit-playground Patch
@rocket.chat/models Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-avatar Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-client Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-video-conf Patch
@rocket.chat/web-ui-registration Patch
@rocket.chat/instance-status Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@dionisio-bot dionisio-bot bot added this to the 6.9 milestone Sep 11, 2024
@dionisio-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

dionisio-bot bot commented Sep 11, 2024

Looks like this PR is ready to merge! 🎉
If you have any trouble, please check the PR guidelines

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 60.51%. Comparing base (6d52f7d) to head (bc0af79).
Report is 2 commits behind head on release-6.9.7.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##           release-6.9.7   #33257      +/-   ##
=================================================
+ Coverage          56.06%   60.51%   +4.44%     
=================================================
  Files               2436     2435       -1     
  Lines              53640    53662      +22     
  Branches           11043    11053      +10     
=================================================
+ Hits               30071    32471    +2400     
+ Misses             20964    20239     -725     
+ Partials            2605      952    -1653     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 59.93% <ø> (+4.47%) ⬆️
e2e-api 46.80% <ø> (+5.63%) ⬆️
unit 75.24% <ø> (+2.78%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@julio-cfa julio-cfa added stat: ready to merge PR tested and approved waiting for merge stat: QA tested labels Sep 11, 2024
@dionisio-bot dionisio-bot bot added stat: QA assured Means it has been tested and approved by a company insider and removed stat: QA tested labels Sep 11, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 07c625c into release-6.9.7 Sep 11, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the backport-6.9.7-33227 branch September 11, 2024 18:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

stat: QA assured Means it has been tested and approved by a company insider stat: ready to merge PR tested and approved waiting for merge

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants