update failing tests#2047
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to Cypress end-to-end tests across four files related to the Applications, Forms, and Add-Ons pages. Key changes include enhanced validation for application templates, the addition of comprehensive tests for the Form Templates page, streamlined validation processes for the Forms page, and an updated selector for the ConvertKit card on the Add-Ons page. The updates improve the flexibility and coverage of the tests without altering any exported or public entity declarations. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tests/cypress/e2e/Applications/validateApplicationsPage.cy.js (1)
19-25: Improved flexibility in header text assertionThe change enhances the test's resilience by allowing for multiple valid header texts. This is a good improvement that can accommodate potential variations in the displayed content, such as A/B testing scenarios.
Consider adding a comment explaining why this flexible assertion is necessary, to help future maintainers understand the reasoning behind this change. For example:
// Flexible assertion to accommodate potential A/B testing or minor text variations cy.get('h1').should(($h1) => { // ... (rest of the code) });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- tests/cypress/e2e/Applications/validateApplicationsPage.cy.js (1 hunks)
- tests/cypress/e2e/Form Templates/FormTemplates.cy.js (2 hunks)
- tests/cypress/e2e/Forms/formPageDataValidation.cy.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
tests/cypress/e2e/Forms/formPageDataValidation.cy.js (3)
17-20: LGTM: Improved upgrade link validationThe simplification of the upgrade link validation process is a good improvement. It reduces complexity while still effectively testing the link's functionality and the correct redirection.
22-23: LGTM: Proper state reset after external navigationThe addition of navigation back to the original page after clicking the upgrade link is a good practice. It ensures that the test environment is reset to the correct state for subsequent assertions.
Line range hint
1-1: Request: Show changes to excerpt view validationThe AI summary mentions updates to the excerpt view validation, including changes to ensure the description field is filled correctly and the updated description is verified in the UI. However, these changes are not visible in the provided diff. Could you please show the relevant changes so I can review them?
✅ Verification successful
No issues found with excerpt view validation changes
The review comment correctly notes that there are no visible changes to the excerpt view validation in the provided diff.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find changes related to excerpt view validation # Test: Search for changes in the excerpt view test rg --type js -C 10 'should validate all data in excerpt view'Length of output: 2300
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/cypress/e2e/Add-Ons/validateAddOnsPage.cy.js (2)
Line range hint
1-646: Consider refactoring the add-on card validation logic.The test case for validating all add-on cards is comprehensive but highly repetitive. Consider refactoring this part of the test to improve maintainability and reduce the risk of errors when adding or modifying add-on validations.
Here's a suggestion for refactoring:
- Create a helper function to validate a single add-on card:
function validateAddonCard(slug, name, iconHref, description, planRequired) { cy.get(`li[data-slug="${slug}"]`).within(() => { cy.get('.frm-font-medium.frm-truncate').should('contain.text', name); cy.get('svg.frmsvg > use').should('have.attr', 'xlink:href', iconHref); cy.get('p.frm-line-clamp-2').should('contain.text', description); cy.contains('Plan required:').within(() => { cy.get('a').should('contain.text', planRequired); }); cy.get('a[aria-label="Upgrade Now"]').should('have.attr', 'target', '_blank') .and('have.attr', 'href').and('include', 'https://formidableforms.com/lite-upgrade/'); }); }
- Use this helper function to validate each add-on card:
validateAddonCard('convertkit', 'ConvertKit', '#frm_convertkit_icon', 'Bring automation into your email marketing plan for the power to say "welcome" to your subscribers the moment they opt-in to your list.', 'Plus'); validateAddonCard('paypal-standard', 'PayPal Standard', '#frm_paypal_icon', 'Collect instant payments and recurring payments to automate your online business. Calculate a total and send customers on to PayPal.', 'Business'); // ... repeat for other add-onsThis refactoring will make the test more maintainable and easier to update when new add-ons are added or existing ones are modified.
Line range hint
648-668: Enhance search functionality test coverage.The current test case for the search functionality covers basic scenarios. Consider expanding the test coverage to include more edge cases and error handling.
Here are some suggestions to enhance the search functionality test:
- Test with special characters in the search query.
- Test with very long search queries.
- Test case sensitivity of the search.
- Test searching by category or plan type.
- Test the behavior when rapidly changing the search query.
Example of additional test cases:
it("should handle edge cases in add-on search", () => { // Test with special characters cy.get('#addon-search-input').type("PayPal & Stripe"); cy.get('.plugin-card').should("exist"); // Test with a very long search query cy.get('#addon-search-input').clear().type("a".repeat(100)); cy.get('#frm-page-skeleton-empty-state').should("exist"); // Test case sensitivity cy.get('#addon-search-input').clear().type("PAYPAL STANDARD"); cy.get('.plugin-card-paypal-standard').should("exist"); // Test searching by category cy.get('#addon-search-input').clear().type("category:automation"); cy.get('.plugin-card').should("exist"); // Test rapid search query changes cy.get('#addon-search-input').clear().type("Pay", {delay: 0}); cy.get('#addon-search-input').type("Pal", {delay: 0}); cy.get('.plugin-card-paypal-standard').should("exist"); });These additional tests will help ensure the robustness of the search functionality across various scenarios.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/cypress/e2e/Add-Ons/validateAddOnsPage.cy.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/cypress/e2e/Add-Ons/validateAddOnsPage.cy.js (2)
643-643: Selector update for ConvertKit card icon.The selector for the ConvertKit card icon has been updated as mentioned in the AI-generated summary. This change ensures that the correct icon is being validated for the ConvertKit add-on.
Line range hint
1-668: Overall assessment of the Add-Ons page tests.The tests for the Add-Ons page are comprehensive and cover the main functionality, including validating add-on cards and testing the search feature. The update to the ConvertKit card selector has been correctly implemented.
To further improve these tests:
- Refactor the repetitive add-on card validation logic to enhance maintainability.
- Expand the search functionality test coverage to include more edge cases and error handling scenarios.
These enhancements will make the tests more robust and easier to maintain as the Add-Ons page evolves.
|
@Crabcyborg I think the tests should be fine for now, but I will run them periodically, especially when there are code updates that could potentially break them in the future. |
Crabcyborg
left a comment
Crabcyborg
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks @lauramekaj1!
🚀
2 participants
No description provided.