update form template tests to be more stable#2185
Conversation
lauramekaj1
changed the title
WalkthroughThe pull request updates the Cypress end-to-end tests for the Form Templates page, adding assertions to validate the presence and correctness of template categories, titles, and descriptions. It refines the functionality for managing favorite templates and expands the search functionality to cover both valid and invalid scenarios. Additionally, error handling in modal interactions is improved, ensuring appropriate error messages are displayed for incorrect inputs. The control flow is adjusted with the inclusion of Changes
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
tests/cypress/e2e/Form Templates/FormTemplates.cy.js (1)
Line range hint
348-370: Avoid using force: true for better test stabilityMultiple click actions use
force: true, which bypasses Cypress's built-in retry-ability and could make tests unstable. Consider:
- Adding proper wait conditions
- Using better selectors
- Ensuring elements are actually clickable
Example refactor:
-cy.get('a#frm-get-code-button').click({force:true}); +cy.get('a#frm-get-code-button') + .should('be.visible') + .should('not.be.disabled') + .click();
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
tests/cypress/e2e/Form Templates/FormTemplates.cy.js (2)
Line range hint
1-391: Consider splitting large test cases for better maintainabilityThe test cases, particularly the validation test (lines 8-391), are quite long. Consider splitting them into smaller, focused test cases. This would:
- Improve test maintainability
- Make failures easier to diagnose
- Allow parallel execution
Example split for the validation test:
describe("Form Templates page content", () => { it("should validate page header and search", () => { // Header and search validation }); it("should validate template categories", () => { // Categories validation }); it("should validate contact templates", () => { // Contact template validations }); // Additional focused test cases... });
Line range hint
1-391: Enhance test coverage with accessibility and keyboard navigationConsider adding tests for:
- Keyboard navigation (Tab, Enter, Escape keys)
- Accessibility compliance (ARIA attributes, screen reader support)
- Performance metrics (loading times, rendering performance)
Example additions:
it('should support keyboard navigation', () => { cy.get('#template-search-input') .type('{tab}') .focused() .should('have.attr', 'aria-label'); cy.get('body').type('{esc}'); cy.get('#modal').should('not.exist'); }); it('should meet accessibility standards', () => { cy.injectAxe(); cy.checkA11y(); });
Crabcyborg
left a comment
Crabcyborg
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks @lauramekaj1!
🚀
2 participants
No description provided.