Lite update for applications dropdown#2167
Conversation
|
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 PHPStan (2.0.3)/bin/bash: line 1: /vendor/bin/phpstan: No such file or directory WalkthroughA new action hook is introduced in the form settings interface. The hook, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant FS as Form Settings
participant AH as Action Hook
participant HF as Hooked Function
FS->>FS: Render form description field
FS->>AH: Trigger do_action('frm_settings_after_form_description', $values)
AH->>HF: Invoke registered hooked functions
HF-->>AH: Return from hooked function
AH-->>FS: Continue rendering settings
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
classes/controllers/FrmApplicationsController.php (1)
76-78: Consider adding PHPDoc for the new parameterThe conditional AJAX handling is good, but the new parameter should be documented. Also, consider using a more descriptive name like
$handle_as_ajax_request./** * Get information about applications via AJAX action. + * + * @param bool $is_ajax_request Whether to handle the request as AJAX and send JSON response * @return void|array */Also applies to: 98-102
classes/views/frm-forms/settings-advanced.php (1)
32-39: Update version number in hook documentationThe
@since x.xtag needs to be updated with the actual version number where this hook is being introduced./** * Fires after the form description field. * - * @since x.x + * @since 6.8 */
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
classes/controllers/FrmApplicationsController.php(2 hunks)classes/views/frm-forms/add_field.php(1 hunks)classes/views/frm-forms/settings-advanced.php(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
classes/controllers/FrmApplicationsController.php (1)
72-74: Method signature change needs verification
The addition of the $is_ajax_request parameter changes the method's return type from void to void|array. This could affect existing callers expecting the method to always handle the response via wp_send_json_success.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for any potential indirect usage through hooks or actions.
Method signature change is safe to proceed
The method get_applications_data is only used in one place - as an AJAX action handler registered via add_action( 'wp_ajax_frm_get_applications_data', 'FrmApplicationsController::get_applications_data' ). Since the default value of the new parameter is true, this maintains backward compatibility with the existing AJAX handler usage. No other direct or indirect calls to this method were found in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct calls to get_applications_data to verify impact
rg "get_applications_data\(" --type php
Length of output: 166
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the class name and method name separately to catch potential variable calls or hook registrations
rg "FrmApplicationsController" --type php -B 2 -A 2
# Also search for potential dynamic calls using variable class name
rg "::get_applications_data" --type php
Length of output: 4745
classes/views/frm-forms/add_field.php (2)
7-9: LGTM: Improved code organization
The restructuring of the divider field condition improves readability by properly separating PHP logic from HTML markup.
Line range hint 7-24: Verify HTML structure for divider sections
The changes affect the HTML structure of divider sections. Please ensure that:
- The divider section container properly wraps all related elements
- The collapse/expand functionality still works as expected
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the collapse functionality and HTML structure.
Let me gather one final piece of information about the JavaScript collapse functionality.
HTML structure and collapse functionality are properly maintained
Based on the code analysis:
- The divider section container (
divider_section_only) properly wraps the field content and action icons - The collapse/expand functionality is correctly implemented:
- Click handler is properly bound to
.frm-collapse-section maybeCollapseSection()function togglesfrm-section-collapsedclass on the parent container
- Click handler is properly bound to
- The HTML structure maintains proper hierarchy with:
- Outer divider section container
- Inner field container with proper action icons
- Collapse/expand button with correct positioning and hover behavior
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for related JavaScript handlers
rg "frm-collapse-section|divider_section_only" --type js
Length of output: 625
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for maybeCollapseSection function implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'function maybeCollapseSection($_) {
$$$
}'
# Search for related HTML structure and classes
rg "frm_inner_field_container|frm-field-action-icons|frm-show-hover" -A 3
Length of output: 10490
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for collapse-related JavaScript code
rg "maybeCollapseSection|\.frm-collapse-section" -A 5 --type js
Length of output: 941
AbdiTolesa
changed the title
|
Hi @AbdiTolesa, |
Thank you for catching that @lauramekaj1! I just fixed that issue but I still see the Cypress workflow fail, is that something related to this update? |
@AbdiTolesa The failing Cypress tests are actually not related to this update. The tests are now fixed in this branch! |
lauramekaj1
left a comment
lauramekaj1
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@AbdiTolesa I tested this and it's working now as expected. Thank you!
Crabcyborg
left a comment
Crabcyborg
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks @AbdiTolesa!
This looks good to me.
I removed the version change in this code, and it would have needed to change in Pro anyway since it was checking for 6.16.3 and we're already on v6.17.1.
🚀
Crabcyborg
deleted the
issue-5463-lite_update_for_applications_dropdown
branch
4 participants
Related issue: https://github.com/Strategy11/formidable-pro/issues/5463