Skip to content

Fix repeater icon conflict with section icon#2166

Merged
Crabcyborg merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
issue-5522-fix_repeater_icon_conflict_with_section_icon
Dec 5, 2024
Merged

Fix repeater icon conflict with section icon#2166
Crabcyborg merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
issue-5522-fix_repeater_icon_conflict_with_section_icon

Conversation

@AbdiTolesa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@AbdiTolesa AbdiTolesa commented Dec 5, 2024

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the rendering logic of form fields in add_field.php, specifically for 'divider' fields, and extensive updates to the CSS styles in frm_admin.css. The rendering logic now includes a conditional check for the form_select property, affecting the icon class used. The CSS updates introduce new variables, enhance UI components, and optimize styles for better maintainability and responsiveness.

Changes

File Change Summary
classes/views/frm-forms/add_field.php Modified rendering logic for 'divider' fields to include a conditional check for the form_select property, altering the icon class dynamically. Adjusted HTML structure for proper closing tags and refined overall flow.
css/frm_admin.css Extensive modifications to CSS, including the addition of new variables for colors, sizes, and spacing. Adjustments to layout properties for responsiveness, updates to media queries, and removal of redundant styles for improved maintainability.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update Default Form Styling #1640: This PR updates the default form styling, which includes changes to the rendering logic for form fields, similar to the modifications made in the main PR for add_field.php.
  • Stop using font icon in section field icons in form builder #2146: This PR also modifies the add_field.php file, specifically enhancing the handling of 'divider' field types, which directly relates to the changes made in the main PR regarding the rendering logic for form fields of type 'divider'.

Suggested reviewers

  • Crabcyborg

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ecb9f68 and 183d5ec.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • classes/views/frm-forms/add_field.php (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • classes/views/frm-forms/add_field.php

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Crabcyborg Crabcyborg added this to the 6.16.3 milestone Dec 5, 2024
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Crabcyborg Crabcyborg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @AbdiTolesa!

@Crabcyborg Crabcyborg merged commit 48d0653 into master Dec 5, 2024
@Crabcyborg Crabcyborg deleted the issue-5522-fix_repeater_icon_conflict_with_section_icon branch December 5, 2024 13:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants