Skip to content

Draft adjustment of ontology to organize glyphs into four classes#101

Closed
jakebeal wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
issue-96
Closed

Draft adjustment of ontology to organize glyphs into four classes#101
jakebeal wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
issue-96

Conversation

@jakebeal
Copy link
Contributor

@jakebeal jakebeal commented Sep 4, 2020

Per issue #96, I have created a draft adjustment of the ontology that organizes all glyphs into the four subclasses provided by the ontology.

This still needs verification and also regeneration of HTML. @goksel , can you please instruct on how to do that? I do not find anything in the README at present.

@jakebeal jakebeal requested a review from goksel September 4, 2020 15:47
@jakebeal jakebeal marked this pull request as draft September 4, 2020 15:48
@cjmyers
Copy link
Contributor

cjmyers commented Sep 4, 2020

@goksel can you review this one?

@goksel
Copy link
Contributor

goksel commented Sep 20, 2020

Jake, apologies, I should have done this already. The changes look ok. However,tThe SBOL Visual Ontology is autogenerated. Do we want to start manually updating the ontology or shall I update the ontology via the script which uses after the Glyph directory files when generating the ontology?

@jakebeal
Copy link
Contributor Author

@goksel I'd like to go with a third option: can you please add documentation and any missing code to the repository so that others (including me) can run the autogeneration?

Expanding the update workflow to include the ontology is one of the big goals that I'd like to see accomplished between now and the end of COMBINE.

@jakebeal
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing in favor of #106

@jakebeal jakebeal closed this Oct 18, 2020
@jakebeal jakebeal deleted the issue-96 branch October 18, 2020 18:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

Comments