Fixes SageMaker operator return values #23628
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
boring-cyborg
bot
added
area:providers
provider:amazon
uranusjr
reviewed
May 11, 2022
2 tasks
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
github-actions
bot
added
stale
ferruzzi
force-pushed
the
ferruzzi/sagemaker-json-fix
branch
2 times, most recently
from
d8e1fde to
1afb918
Compare
ferruzzi
force-pushed
the
ferruzzi/sagemaker-json-fix
branch
from
1afb918 to
f3d1ab8
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
@uranusjr It looks like this works, is it what you had in mind? |
uranusjr
approved these changes
Aug 30, 2022
89 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While revising the SageMaker Sample DAG I noticed a small bug where the describe* operators would throw a "datetime.datetime not JSON serializable" exception. This fixes the bug and revises the new Sagemaker Sample DAGs.
Related to: #23256
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code change, Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragement file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.