Skip to content

Conversation

@dstandish
Copy link
Contributor

We don't need this function. There's already an almost-identical function on DagRun that we can use, namely DagRun.active_runs_of_dags.

Also simplified that one.

We don't need this function.  There's already an almost-identical function on DagRun that we can use, namely DagRun.active_runs_of_dags.

Also simplified that one.
@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added the area:Scheduler including HA (high availability) scheduler label Oct 16, 2024
@shahar1 shahar1 added airflow3.0:candidate Potential candidates for Airflow 3.0 airflow3.0:breaking Candidates for Airflow 3.0 that contain breaking changes labels Oct 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@shahar1 shahar1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that it's worth a newfragment as a breaking change, otherwise LGTM

@shahar1 shahar1 added this to the Airflow 3.0.0 milestone Oct 16, 2024
@dstandish dstandish merged commit 598e0ee into apache:main Oct 16, 2024
@dstandish dstandish deleted the remove-get-num-active-runs branch October 16, 2024 15:07
R7L208 pushed a commit to R7L208/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2024
We don't need this function.  There's already an almost-identical function on DagRun that we can use, namely DagRun.active_runs_of_dags.

Also simplified that one.
harjeevanmaan pushed a commit to harjeevanmaan/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
We don't need this function.  There's already an almost-identical function on DagRun that we can use, namely DagRun.active_runs_of_dags.

Also simplified that one.
PaulKobow7536 pushed a commit to PaulKobow7536/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2024
We don't need this function.  There's already an almost-identical function on DagRun that we can use, namely DagRun.active_runs_of_dags.

Also simplified that one.
ellisms pushed a commit to ellisms/airflow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
We don't need this function.  There's already an almost-identical function on DagRun that we can use, namely DagRun.active_runs_of_dags.

Also simplified that one.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

airflow3.0:breaking Candidates for Airflow 3.0 that contain breaking changes airflow3.0:candidate Potential candidates for Airflow 3.0 area:Scheduler including HA (high availability) scheduler

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants