Skip to content

Conversation

@ephraimbuddy
Copy link
Contributor

This is necessary for a smooth migration from the old DB to the new one that added versioning; otherwise, the non-nullable columns raise an integrity error.

Instead of populating those not nullable columns, this seems to be a better option since the Serialized Dag and DagCode would be regenerated after the migration.

This is necessary for a smooth migration from the old DB to the new
one that added versioning; otherwise, the non-nullable columns raise an integrity error.

Instead of populating those not nullable columns, this seems to be
a better option since the Serialized Dag and DagCode would be regenerated after the migration.
@ephraimbuddy ephraimbuddy merged commit 438f71d into apache:main Nov 5, 2024
@ephraimbuddy ephraimbuddy deleted the delete-serdag-code branch November 5, 2024 17:54
potiuk added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2024
potiuk added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2024
* Revert "Delete the Serialized Dag and DagCode before DagVersion migration (#43700)"

This reverts commit 438f71d.

* Revert "AIP-65: Add DAG versioning support (#42913)"

This reverts commit 1116f28.
ellisms pushed a commit to ellisms/airflow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
…ache#43700)

This is necessary for a smooth migration from the old DB to the new
one that added versioning; otherwise, the non-nullable columns raise an integrity error.

Instead of populating those not nullable columns, this seems to be
a better option since the Serialized Dag and DagCode would be regenerated after the migration.
ellisms pushed a commit to ellisms/airflow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
* Revert "Delete the Serialized Dag and DagCode before DagVersion migration (apache#43700)"

This reverts commit 438f71d.

* Revert "AIP-65: Add DAG versioning support (apache#42913)"

This reverts commit 1116f28.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants