Skip to content

Conversation

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk commented Feb 3, 2025

Because of the failures with building image we had some issues with docs building - some indexes were missing.

I also found that one of the link types (versioned doc link in README) has not been updated in move_providers script.


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

Because of the failures with building image we had some issues
with docs building - some indexes were missing.

I also found that one of the link types (versioned doc link in README)
has not been updated in move_providers script.
@potiuk potiuk force-pushed the fix-main-docs-issues branch from f61907f to 0c7e309 Compare February 3, 2025 13:29
@potiuk potiuk merged commit ee6bd7e into apache:main Feb 3, 2025
91 checks passed
@potiuk potiuk deleted the fix-main-docs-issues branch February 3, 2025 14:43
niklasr22 pushed a commit to niklasr22/airflow that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2025
Because of the failures with building image we had some issues
with docs building - some indexes were missing.

I also found that one of the link types (versioned doc link in README)
has not been updated in move_providers script.
ambika-garg pushed a commit to ambika-garg/airflow that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2025
Because of the failures with building image we had some issues
with docs building - some indexes were missing.

I also found that one of the link types (versioned doc link in README)
has not been updated in move_providers script.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment