Skip to content

Conversation

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk commented Feb 6, 2025


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

Copy link
Contributor

@jscheffl jscheffl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wohoo! Get rid of caplog!

@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Feb 6, 2025

Wohoo! Get rid of caplog!

Indeed :D ... Caplog

@potiuk potiuk merged commit a829177 into apache:main Feb 6, 2025
62 checks passed
@potiuk potiuk deleted the replace_caplog_with_log_mocking_in_wasb_tests branch February 6, 2025 22:19
@bugraoz93
Copy link
Contributor

One down :D Thanks! I have started listing all caplog usage and will create a high-level plan this weekend to see how we can easily approach it. I will create an engagement again on the approach. The first layer is to include a selective check to make maintainers aware, which created the issue already #46445

niklasr22 pushed a commit to niklasr22/airflow that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2025
ambika-garg pushed a commit to ambika-garg/airflow that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants