WIP: [R] Verify CRAN release-11.0.0-rc0

[thisisnic]

Do not review/merge; this is just part of the R release process

[github-actions]

Thanks for opening a pull request!

If this is not a minor PR. Could you open an issue for this pull request on GitHub? https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/new/choose

Opening GitHub issues ahead of time contributes to the Openness of the Apache Arrow project.

Then could you also rename the pull request title in the following format?

GH-${GITHUB_ISSUE_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

or

MINOR: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

In the case of PARQUET issues on JIRA the title also supports:

PARQUET-${JIRA_ISSUE_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

• Other pull requests
• Contribution Guidelines - How to contribute patches

[thisisnic]

@github-actions crossbow submit --group r

[github-actions]

Revision: 9543e10

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-b14e29c074

Task	Status
conda-linux-aarch64-cpu-r41
conda-linux-aarch64-cpu-r42
conda-linux-x64-cpu-r41
conda-linux-x64-cpu-r42
conda-osx-arm64-cpu-r41
conda-osx-arm64-cpu-r42
conda-osx-x64-cpu-r41
conda-osx-x64-cpu-r42
conda-win-x64-cpu-r41
homebrew-r-autobrew
homebrew-r-brew
r-binary-packages
test-fedora-r-clang-sanitizer
test-r-arrow-backwards-compatibility
test-r-depsource-bundled
test-r-depsource-system
test-r-dev-duckdb
test-r-devdocs
test-r-gcc-11
test-r-gcc-12
test-r-install-local
test-r-install-local-minsizerel
test-r-library-r-base-latest
test-r-linux-as-cran
test-r-linux-rchk
test-r-linux-valgrind
test-r-minimal-build
test-r-offline-maximal
test-r-offline-minimal
test-r-rhub-debian-gcc-devel-lto-latest
test-r-rhub-debian-gcc-release-custom-ccache
test-r-rhub-ubuntu-gcc-release-latest
test-r-rstudio-r-base-4.1-opensuse153
test-r-rstudio-r-base-4.2-centos7-devtoolset-8
test-r-rstudio-r-base-4.2-focal
test-r-ubuntu-22.04
test-r-versions
test-ubuntu-18.04-r-sanitizer

[paleolimbot]

I just kicked off a revdep run using:

cd path/to/arrow
R -e 'usethis::pr_fetch(33952)`
archery docker run r-revdepcheck

[paleolimbot]

Ok - there are no changes for the worse reported by the archery revdep job; however, I'd like to test it by hand too using my hacked-together method (probably tomorrow morning).

[thisisnic]

OK, so the valgrind failure is one we know about, but wasn't the devdocs one that @paleolimbot already fixed?

[thisisnic]

Ah, it's this: #33898

Though it's not failing on the nightlies any more.

[thisisnic]

@github-actions crossbow submit r-binary-packages

[github-actions]

Revision: 9543e10

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-831234295c

Task	Status
r-binary-packages