Skip to content

Conversation

@kou
Copy link
Member

@kou kou commented Jul 14, 2023

Rationale for this change

test_invalid_non_join_column depends on Acero.

What changes are included in this PR?

Add @pytest.mark.acero.

Are these changes tested?

Yes.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

@kou
Copy link
Member Author

kou commented Jul 14, 2023

@github-actions crossbow submit example-python-minimal-*

@github-actions
Copy link

Revision: d2dccae

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-e2a643ed4e

Task Status
example-python-minimal-build-fedora-conda Github Actions
example-python-minimal-build-ubuntu-venv Github Actions

Copy link
Member

@raulcd raulcd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @kou

@github-actions github-actions bot added awaiting merge Awaiting merge and removed awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review labels Jul 14, 2023
@raulcd raulcd merged commit cf558cc into apache:main Jul 14, 2023
@raulcd raulcd removed the awaiting merge Awaiting merge label Jul 14, 2023
@kou kou deleted the pyarrow-missing-acero-mark branch July 14, 2023 19:55
@conbench-apache-arrow
Copy link

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit cf558cc.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[CI][Python] example-python-minimal-* are failed

2 participants