-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
GH-37209: [CI][Docs][MATLAB] Remove support for MATLAB_ARROW_INTERFACE flag from CMake build system and build new MATLAB Interface code by default
#37211
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
CMakeLists.txt. 2. Remove mention of `MATLAB_ARROW_INTERFACE` flag from MATLAB `README.md`.
|
|
sgilmore10
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good to me.
MATLAB_ARROW_INTERFACE flag from CMake build system and build new MATLAB Interface code by defaultMATLAB_ARROW_INTERFACE flag from CMake build system and build new MATLAB Interface code by default
MATLAB_ARROW_INTERFACE flag from CMake build system and build new MATLAB Interface code by defaultMATLAB_ARROW_INTERFACE flag from CMake build system and build new MATLAB Interface code by default
|
FYI - @CurtHagenlocher / @westonpace - it looks like the "Dev / Source Release and Merge Script" CI workflow is failing. The logs mention C# and FlatBuffers. Could this be related to #35699? |
Seems likely. I'll take a look. |
|
My mistake, I merged an old PR without thinking that I should probably rebase it first. Fix incoming in #37214 |
kou
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1
… for new MATLAB APIs (e.g. `RecordBatch`, `Field`, `Schema`, etc.) (#37215) ### Rationale for this change Over the last few months, a number of new user-facing APIs have been added or changed in the MATLAB Interface. ## Examples: ### Construction Functions - `arrow.array` - `arrow.field` - `arrow.schema` - `arrow.recordbatch` - `arrow.boolean`, `arrow.string`, `arrow.timestamp`, etc. (type construction functions) ### Classes - `arrow.type.Field` - `arrow.tabular.Schema` - `arrow.tabular.RecordBatch` - `arrow.array.StringArray` - `arrow.array.TimestampArray` ### Indexing Methods - `arrow.tabular.Schema.field(i)` - `arrow.tabular.RecordBatch.column(i)` ### Static Construction Methods - `arrow.tabular.RecordBatch.fromArrays(a1, ..., aN)` - `arrow.array.StringArray.fromMATLAB(a)` --- This pull request updates the [`README.md` for the MATLAB Interface](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/main/matlab/README.md) to reflect these changes. ### What changes are included in this PR? Updated MATLAB `README.md`: 1. Updated **Status** section to mention support for new Arrow types and functionality. 2. Added usage examples for `Type, `Field`, `Schema`, and `RecordBatch`. 3. Updated Feather v1 usage examples to illustrate support for types like `String` and `Boolean`. ### Are these changes tested? N/A. This is purely a documentation change. I manually reviewed the visual rendering of the `README.md` Markdown on GitHub. ### Are there any user-facing changes? Yes. 1. The MATLAB `README.md` now includes more usage examples which illustrate how to use the MATLAB interface. ### Future Directions 1. Add comprehensive documentation for all classes and methods, including supported input argument types and name-value pairs. 2. Add more detailed information on future development plans and development status to the `README.md`. 3. Add a table of contents to the MATLAB `README.md`. 4. Keep the `README.md` up to date more proactively. ### Notes 1. Thank you @ sgilmore10 for your help with this pull request! 2. My apologies in advance if this is too much documentation content to review at once. We will focus on being more incremental about keeping the MATLAB documentation up to date in the future. 3. #37211 also involves updating the MATLAB `README.md`, so there is a chance we may need to rebase before merging these changes in. * Closes: #37210 Lead-authored-by: Kevin Gurney <kgurney@mathworks.com> Co-authored-by: Kevin Gurney <kevin.p.gurney@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@cozmixng.org> Co-authored-by: Sarah Gilmore <sgilmore@mathworks.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Gurney <kgurney@mathworks.com>
|
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 5 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 4680ca5. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. |
…NTERFACE` flag from CMake build system and build new MATLAB Interface code by default (apache#37211) ### Rationale for this change Now that the old Feather V1 code and associated build infrastructure has been removed (apache#37204), it makes sense to start building the new, experimental MATLAB Interface code by default (without needing to [explicitly specify `-D MATLAB_ARROW_INTERFACE=ON`](https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/main/matlab#build)). This pull request removes the `MATLAB_ARROW_INTERFACE` flag entirely, since setting it to `OFF` when we are building the MATLAB Interface code by default would essentially imply that no code should be built. ### What changes are included in this PR? 1. Removed mention of `MATLAB_ARROW_INTERFACE` flag from MATLAB `README.md`. 2. Removed conditional check for `MATLAB_ARROW_INTERFACE` flag from MATLAB `CMakeLists.txt`. 3. Removed `MATLAB_ARROW_INTERFACE` flag from `matlab_build.sh` CI script. ### Are these changes tested? Yes. The MATLAB Interface is building as expected by default on my Debian 11 machine. ### Are there any user-facing changes? Yes. 1. The experimental MATLAB Interface APIs will now be built by default without users explicitly specifying `-D MATLAB_ARROW_INTERFACE=ON` to `cmake`. 2. If users specify a value for `MATLAB_ARROW_INTERFACE`, the value will be ignored by the CMake build system. * Closes: apache#37209 Authored-by: Kevin Gurney <kgurney@mathworks.com> Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
…upport for new MATLAB APIs (e.g. `RecordBatch`, `Field`, `Schema`, etc.) (apache#37215) ### Rationale for this change Over the last few months, a number of new user-facing APIs have been added or changed in the MATLAB Interface. ## Examples: ### Construction Functions - `arrow.array` - `arrow.field` - `arrow.schema` - `arrow.recordbatch` - `arrow.boolean`, `arrow.string`, `arrow.timestamp`, etc. (type construction functions) ### Classes - `arrow.type.Field` - `arrow.tabular.Schema` - `arrow.tabular.RecordBatch` - `arrow.array.StringArray` - `arrow.array.TimestampArray` ### Indexing Methods - `arrow.tabular.Schema.field(i)` - `arrow.tabular.RecordBatch.column(i)` ### Static Construction Methods - `arrow.tabular.RecordBatch.fromArrays(a1, ..., aN)` - `arrow.array.StringArray.fromMATLAB(a)` --- This pull request updates the [`README.md` for the MATLAB Interface](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/main/matlab/README.md) to reflect these changes. ### What changes are included in this PR? Updated MATLAB `README.md`: 1. Updated **Status** section to mention support for new Arrow types and functionality. 2. Added usage examples for `Type, `Field`, `Schema`, and `RecordBatch`. 3. Updated Feather v1 usage examples to illustrate support for types like `String` and `Boolean`. ### Are these changes tested? N/A. This is purely a documentation change. I manually reviewed the visual rendering of the `README.md` Markdown on GitHub. ### Are there any user-facing changes? Yes. 1. The MATLAB `README.md` now includes more usage examples which illustrate how to use the MATLAB interface. ### Future Directions 1. Add comprehensive documentation for all classes and methods, including supported input argument types and name-value pairs. 2. Add more detailed information on future development plans and development status to the `README.md`. 3. Add a table of contents to the MATLAB `README.md`. 4. Keep the `README.md` up to date more proactively. ### Notes 1. Thank you @ sgilmore10 for your help with this pull request! 2. My apologies in advance if this is too much documentation content to review at once. We will focus on being more incremental about keeping the MATLAB documentation up to date in the future. 3. apache#37211 also involves updating the MATLAB `README.md`, so there is a chance we may need to rebase before merging these changes in. * Closes: apache#37210 Lead-authored-by: Kevin Gurney <kgurney@mathworks.com> Co-authored-by: Kevin Gurney <kevin.p.gurney@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@cozmixng.org> Co-authored-by: Sarah Gilmore <sgilmore@mathworks.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Gurney <kgurney@mathworks.com>
Rationale for this change
Now that the old Feather V1 code and associated build infrastructure has been removed (#37204), it makes sense to start building the new, experimental MATLAB Interface code by default (without needing to explicitly specify
-D MATLAB_ARROW_INTERFACE=ON).This pull request removes the
MATLAB_ARROW_INTERFACEflag entirely, since setting it toOFFwhen we are building the MATLAB Interface code by default would essentially imply that no code should be built.What changes are included in this PR?
MATLAB_ARROW_INTERFACEflag from MATLABREADME.md.MATLAB_ARROW_INTERFACEflag from MATLABCMakeLists.txt.MATLAB_ARROW_INTERFACEflag frommatlab_build.shCI script.Are these changes tested?
Yes.
The MATLAB Interface is building as expected by default on my Debian 11 machine.
Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes.
-D MATLAB_ARROW_INTERFACE=ONtocmake.MATLAB_ARROW_INTERFACE, the value will be ignored by the CMake build system.MATLAB_ARROW_INTERFACEflag from CMake build system and build new MATLAB Interface code by default #37209