Skip to content

Conversation

@kiszk
Copy link
Member

@kiszk kiszk commented Aug 12, 2020

This PR aims to take care of data layout on little- and big-endian platforms in TestEndianness.testLittleEndian

@github-actions
Copy link

@nealrichardson
Copy link
Member

Is this mergeable now? According to the mailing list discussion:

It does not seem too invasive to support native endianness in
implementation libraries. As long as there is appropriate performance
testing and CI infrastructure to demonstrate the changes work.

If I read this PR correctly, it's just changing the test to follow native endianness.

@kiszk
Copy link
Member Author

kiszk commented Oct 6, 2020

Thank you for your comment.

According to Micah 's comment, we may wait until he will update the document soon.
@emkornfield WDYT?

Since Java CI was merged, I rebased to run Java CI.

@emkornfield
Copy link
Contributor

Opened #8374 to make sure we are all on the same page, once that goes in, I think we can submit this.

@kiszk kiszk force-pushed the ARROW-9704 branch 2 times, most recently from b807bd0 to bcd756d Compare October 30, 2020 04:45
@kiszk
Copy link
Member Author

kiszk commented Oct 30, 2020

@nealrichardson @emkornfield Is it ok to merge this? I think that this failure is not related to the change of this PR.

@nealrichardson
Copy link
Member

Sounds like it. I'll merge.

pribor pushed a commit to GlobalWebIndex/arrow that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2025
…nd big-endian platforms

This PR aims to take care of data layout on little- and big-endian platforms in `TestEndianness.testLittleEndian`

Closes apache#7942 from kiszk/ARROW-9704

Authored-by: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Neal Richardson <neal.p.richardson@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants