ARROW-10203: [Doc] Give guidance on big-endian support in the contributors docs #8374
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just FYI: While there is no PR to implement cross platform support for Java, I will submit the PR later after supporting the level 1.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think @jacques-n was against cross-platform support in Java?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I see. Before the asking review for the PR, I will gather the consensus on the ML.
pitrou
changed the title
kszucs
changed the title
adress comments.
emkornfield
force-pushed
the
update_contributor_guidelines
branch
from
aae6c43 to
27d6273
Compare
|
I'm having trouble getting the source build environment setup on my machine to verify correct layout, I'll try again tomorrow. Let me know if there are other comments otherwise I think we can merge this and go ahead and start incorporating the other PRs for endianness. |
| +++++++++ | ||
| The Arrow format allows setting endianness. Due to the popularity of little endian | ||
| architectures most of implementation assume little endian by default. There has been some | ||
| effort to support big endian platforms as well. Based on a mailing list discussion, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Would it be good to link some JIRAs either here or below?
| ``deserialize_components`` is also available as a method on | ||
| ``SerializationContext`` objects. | ||
|
|
||
| Serializing pandas Objects |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Had to remove this to build the docs. This is a deprecated functionality.
|
+1, will merge. |
…utors docs @kiszk @jacques-n @wesm @pitrou @BryanCutler @nealrichardson this capture my understanding of the mailing list conversation on endianness. Please let me know if I've mischaracterized anything (I'll do a proof reading/compiling round once as long as the general points are agreed upon). Closes #8374 from emkornfield/update_contributor_guidelines Lead-authored-by: Micah Kornfield <emkornfield@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: emkornfield <micahk@google.com> Co-authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org> Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
6 participants
@kiszk @jacques-n @wesm @pitrou @BryanCutler @nealrichardson this capture my understanding of the mailing list conversation on endianness. Please let me know if I've mischaracterized anything (I'll do a proof reading/compiling round once as long as the general points are agreed upon).