Skip to content

Conversation

@swegner
Copy link
Contributor

@swegner swegner commented Mar 22, 2016

Translate registered display data into the job steps used by DataflowPipelineRunner.

@swegner
Copy link
Contributor Author

swegner commented Mar 22, 2016

R: @bjchambers @kennknowles


private void addDisplayData(String name, DisplayData displayData) {
List<Map<String, Object>> serializedItems = Lists.newArrayList();
ObjectMapper mapper = MAPPER.setSerializationInclusion(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this mutate MAPPER?
If yes, isn't that a problem?
If no, would it make sense to have a separate static "NON_NULL_MAPPER" so we don't need to create a new mapper for every step? Any performance risk there?

@bjchambers
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM.

@kennknowles in your court

@kennknowles
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@swegner swegner force-pushed the displaydata-runner branch from f86cabe to 46946ea Compare March 23, 2016 20:33
@asfgit asfgit merged commit 46946ea into apache:master Mar 23, 2016
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2016
@swegner swegner deleted the displaydata-runner branch March 28, 2016 20:48
davorbonaci added a commit to GoogleCloudPlatform/DataflowJavaSDK that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2016
iemejia referenced this pull request in iemejia/beam Jan 12, 2018
hengfengli referenced this pull request in hengfengli/beam Mar 21, 2022
ryucc added a commit to ryucc/beam that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2023
Move Samza portable metric warning logs to debug level
pl04351820 pushed a commit to pl04351820/beam that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2023
pl04351820 pushed a commit to pl04351820/beam that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2023
towards apache#65

this PR is staged on top of apache#66 as later refactor changes will be cross-class; I encourage reviewing in sequential order
pl04351820 pushed a commit to pl04351820/beam that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2023
towards apache#65

this PR is staged on top of apache#67 as later refactor changes will be cross-class; I encourage reviewing in sequential order
pl04351820 pushed a commit to pl04351820/beam that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2023
towards apache#65

this PR is staged on top of apache#68 as later refactor changes will be cross-class; I encourage reviewing in sequential order
pl04351820 pushed a commit to pl04351820/beam that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2023
towards apache#65

this PR is staged on top of apache#69 as refactor changes are cross-class; I encourage reviewing in sequential order
pl04351820 pushed a commit to pl04351820/beam that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants