[BEAM-8204][BEAM-8205] Exclude AvroSchemaTest for Apex and Flink runner for now

[robinyqiu]

Exclude the test because they are currently breaking post-commit tests.

The test was added in #9454

r: @TheNeuralBit @reuvenlax

Post-Commit Tests Status (on master branch)

Lang	SDK	Apex	Dataflow	Flink	Gearpump	Samza	Spark
Go		---	---		---	---
Java
Python		---			---	---
XLang	---	---	---		---	---	---

Pre-Commit Tests Status (on master branch)

---	Java	Python	Go	Website
Non-portable
Portable	---		---	---

See .test-infra/jenkins/README for trigger phrase, status and link of all Jenkins jobs.

[robinyqiu]

Run Flink ValidatesRunner

[robinyqiu]

Run Apex ValidatesRunner

[robinyqiu]

Run Flink ValidatesRunner

[robinyqiu]

Run Apex ValidatesRunner

[reuvenlax]

How are they breaking those runners? This test should be working fine on those runners AFAIK.

…

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 5:53 PM Yueyang Qiu ***@***.***> wrote: Run Apex ValidatesRunner — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#9541?email_source=notifications&email_token=AFAYJVLD2EEFCDERKGEZLJTQJA6PZA5CNFSM4IVN4VMKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD6M5DLY#issuecomment-530174383>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFAYJVJ6IMOT3OEHV6QOIRDQJA6PZANCNFSM4IVN4VMA> .

[TheNeuralBit]

I'm not really up to speed on what's going on here, but both Apex and Flink seem upset about coders of two different types, if that helps. From the Flink run:

org.apache.beam.sdk.Pipeline$PipelineExecutionException: org.apache.flink.api.common.InvalidProgramException: Cannot union inputs of different types. 

and from the Apex run:

org.apache.apex.api.Launcher$LauncherException: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: ParMultiDo(Anonymous): Multiple side inputs with different coders.

[robinyqiu]

Yes, and full error messages are here and here.

[markflyhigh]

Thank you Robin to keep ValidatesRunner test green. This PR LGTM.

[TheNeuralBit]

+1 LGTM. I think @reuvenlax is right that #9446's addition of SchemaCoder.equals may fix this, but it's not fully baked yet. I think we should just skip until we can get the equality check right and un-skip these.

[reuvenlax]

Technically I think Flink should not be relying on comparing coders. Beam has never required Coder authors to implement a Java equals method, and other runners don't do such Coder comparisons on flatten. However for now we can disable the test on Flink.

…

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 1:07 PM Brian Hulette ***@***.***> wrote: +1 LGTM. I think @reuvenlax <https://github.com/reuvenlax> is right that #9446 <#9446>'s addition of SchemaCoder.equals may fix this, but it's not fully baked yet. I think we should just skip until we can get the equality check right and un-skip these. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#9541?email_source=notifications&email_token=AFAYJVJDFAZZIPKEDUFJP5DQJFFX7A5CNFSM4IVN4VMKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD6PXNZA#issuecomment-530544356>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFAYJVORR3UE3KAPFPZHBWDQJFFX7ANCNFSM4IVN4VMA> .

[markflyhigh]

Got enough lgtm. I'll merge this.