Apache Cloudberry version
The source release for Apache Cloudberry (Incubating) 2.0.0 RC1 includes two filenames that reference the Greenplum® trademark:
greenplum_path.sh
gpMgmt/bin/generate-greenplum-path.sh
These files are invoked during the installation process and are therefore part of the user-visible and executable surface area of the product.
Why this is a problem
Under Apache Software Foundation policy, release artifacts must not include third-party trademarks in filenames, scripts, generated files, or visible output — unless required for compatibility and accompanied by explicit disclaimers.
These two files risk implying affiliation or endorsement by Broadcom Inc., which owns the Greenplum® trademark. This is especially concerning because:
generate-greenplum-path.sh is executed during installation
It produces an environment script named greenplum_path.sh
There is no contextual disclaimer or namespace isolation
This violates ASF release guidelines and blocks the promotion of RC1.
Context
This issue was flagged during the RC1 vote process by the release manager. A re-roll of RC2 will occur once the rename and install updates are complete.
What happened
Under Apache Software Foundation policy, release artifacts must not include third-party trademarks in filenames, scripts, generated files, or visible output — unless required for compatibility and accompanied by explicit disclaimers.
What you think should happen instead
Proposed Fix
Rename gpMgmt/bin/generate-greenplum-path.sh to generate-cloudberry-env.sh
Update the generated file name to cloudberry_env.sh (or another project-appropriate name)
Update all installation tooling, scripting, and test references accordingly
Validate the renamed script and generated file perform correctly
Document the rename in the changelog or README if needed
How to reproduce
Install from source and the file greenplum_path.sh is created in the installation directory.
Operating System
Linux
Anything else
No response
Are you willing to submit PR?
Code of Conduct
Apache Cloudberry version
The source release for Apache Cloudberry (Incubating) 2.0.0 RC1 includes two filenames that reference the Greenplum® trademark:
These files are invoked during the installation process and are therefore part of the user-visible and executable surface area of the product.
Why this is a problem
Under Apache Software Foundation policy, release artifacts must not include third-party trademarks in filenames, scripts, generated files, or visible output — unless required for compatibility and accompanied by explicit disclaimers.
These two files risk implying affiliation or endorsement by Broadcom Inc., which owns the Greenplum® trademark. This is especially concerning because:
This violates ASF release guidelines and blocks the promotion of RC1.
Context
This issue was flagged during the RC1 vote process by the release manager. A re-roll of RC2 will occur once the rename and install updates are complete.
What happened
Under Apache Software Foundation policy, release artifacts must not include third-party trademarks in filenames, scripts, generated files, or visible output — unless required for compatibility and accompanied by explicit disclaimers.
What you think should happen instead
Proposed Fix
How to reproduce
Install from source and the file greenplum_path.sh is created in the installation directory.
Operating System
Linux
Anything else
No response
Are you willing to submit PR?
Code of Conduct