Skip to content

chore: [branch-0.10] Support Spark 4.0.1 instead of 4.0.0 (#2414)#2497

Merged
andygrove merged 2 commits intoapache:branch-0.10from
andygrove:backport-2414
Sep 30, 2025
Merged

chore: [branch-0.10] Support Spark 4.0.1 instead of 4.0.0 (#2414)#2497
andygrove merged 2 commits intoapache:branch-0.10from
andygrove:backport-2414

Conversation

@andygrove
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@andygrove andygrove commented Sep 29, 2025

Which issue does this PR close?

Part of #2423

Backport #2414 to branch-0.10

Rationale for this change

What changes are included in this PR?

How are these changes tested?

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented Sep 29, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (branch-0.10@e28d436). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##             branch-0.10    #2497   +/-   ##
==============================================
  Coverage               ?   57.60%           
  Complexity             ?     1296           
==============================================
  Files                  ?      147           
  Lines                  ?    13507           
  Branches               ?     2391           
==============================================
  Hits                   ?     7781           
  Misses                 ?     4457           
  Partials               ?     1269           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@andygrove andygrove marked this pull request as ready for review September 29, 2025 22:13
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@parthchandra parthchandra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm


// Check if there's opportunity to directly copy bytes using `memcpy`.
if (offset + i) % 8 == 0 && i < num_bits_to_read {
if (offset + i).is_multiple_of(8) && i < num_bits_to_read {
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems unrelated, though not wrong :)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, clippy fixes were needed

@andygrove andygrove merged commit 6023495 into apache:branch-0.10 Sep 30, 2025
96 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants