-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
Derive WindowUDFImpl equality, hash from Eq, Hash traits
#17081
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
4e26aaa to
b6fcc88
Compare
WindowUDFImpl equality, hash from Eq, Hash traits
c50b82d to
58c1e4f
Compare
alamb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @findepi -- I think the code is looking good here
The only thing I think is missing is some additional documentation in the Upgrading.md guide to explain to people upgrading what they will need to do (add PartialEq and Eq derivation to their functions, right?)
|
The dependency PRs have been merged, will rebase |
Use `DynEq` and `DynHash` traits from physical expressions crate to a common crate for physical and logical expressions. This allows them to be used by logical expressions.
Previously, the `WindowUDFImpl` trait contained `equals` and `hash_value` methods with contracts following the `Eq` and `Hash` traits. However, the existence of default implementations of these methods made it error-prone, with many functions (scalar, aggregate, window) missing to customize the equals even though they ought to. There is no fix to this that's not an API breaking change, so a breaking change is warranted. Removing the default implementations would be enough of a solution, but at the cost of a lot of boilerplate needed in implementations. Instead, this removes the methods from the trait, and reuses `DynEq`, `DynHash` traits used previously only for physical expressions. This allows for functions to provide their implementations using no more than `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]` in a typical case.
58c1e4f to
ab03a96
Compare
timsaucer
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thanks!
kosiew
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Left some comments for your consideration.
Wrong Any was compared
alamb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @findepi @xudong963 and @kosiew
Co-authored-by: Andrew Lamb <andrew@nerdnetworks.org>
|
All comments addressed. Thank you @alamb @xudong963 @timsaucer @kosiew for your diligent reviews! |
Previously, the
WindowUDFImpltrait containedequalsandhash_valuemethods with contracts following theEqandHashtraits. However, the existence of default implementations of these
methods made it error-prone, with many functions (scalar, aggregate,
window) missing to customize the equals even though they ought to.
There is no fix to this that's not an API breaking change, so a breaking
change is warranted.
Removing the default implementations would be enough of a solution, but
at the cost of a lot of boilerplate needed in implementations.
Instead, this removes the methods from the trait, and reuses
DynEq,DynHashtraits used previously only for physical expressions. Thisallows for functions to provide their implementations using no more than
#[derive(PartialEq, Eq, Hash)]in a typical case.WindowUDFImpl) #16870WindowUDFImpl::{equals,hash_value}withUdfHash,UdfEqtraits #16873