-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
[Feature](Nereids)add executable function to support fold constant for functions. #18209
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
run buildall |
|
TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result: |
|
run buildall |
|
run ckbench |
|
run buildall |
|
add UT and regression test please |
f96fc0b to
1ef2be2
Compare
|
run buildall |
2 similar comments
|
run buildall |
|
run buildall |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
run buildall |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
9 similar comments
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
run buildall |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
1 similar comment
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
run buildall |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
Gabriel39
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
|
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
… range (apache#49033) Related PR: apache#18209 Problem Summary: SELECT STR_TO_DATE('2025-04-31', '%Y-%m-%d') AS result; would be changed to result 2025-04-30 in smart mode by mistake
… range (apache#49033) Related PR: apache#18209 Problem Summary: SELECT STR_TO_DATE('2025-04-31', '%Y-%m-%d') AS result; would be changed to result 2025-04-30 in smart mode by mistake
… range (apache#49033) Related PR: apache#18209 Problem Summary: SELECT STR_TO_DATE('2025-04-31', '%Y-%m-%d') AS result; would be changed to result 2025-04-30 in smart mode by mistake
… range (apache#49033) Related PR: apache#18209 Problem Summary: SELECT STR_TO_DATE('2025-04-31', '%Y-%m-%d') AS result; would be changed to result 2025-04-30 in smart mode by mistake
… range (apache#49033) Related PR: apache#18209 Problem Summary: SELECT STR_TO_DATE('2025-04-31', '%Y-%m-%d') AS result; would be changed to result 2025-04-30 in smart mode by mistake
… range (apache#49033) Related PR: apache#18209 Problem Summary: SELECT STR_TO_DATE('2025-04-31', '%Y-%m-%d') AS result; would be changed to result 2025-04-30 in smart mode by mistake
… range (apache#49033) ### What problem does this PR solve? Related PR: apache#18209 Problem Summary: SELECT STR_TO_DATE('2025-04-31', '%Y-%m-%d') AS result; would be changed to result 2025-04-30 in smart mode by mistake
Proposed changes
Issue Number: close #19623
Problem summary
This is the list of executable date-time function nereids supports up to now:
developing: time-round functions
Checklist(Required)
Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...