Skip to content

Conversation

@amorynan
Copy link
Contributor

@amorynan amorynan commented Oct 25, 2024

speed up is_ip_address_in_range with inverted index

Proposed changes

Issue Number: close #xxx

@doris-robot
Copy link

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR

Since 2024-03-18, the Document has been moved to doris-website.
See Doris Document.

@amorynan
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clang-tidy made some suggestions

}
}

Status evaluate_inverted_index(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

warning: function 'evaluate_inverted_index' exceeds recommended size/complexity thresholds [readability-function-size]

    Status evaluate_inverted_index(
           ^
Additional context

be/src/vec/functions/function_ip.h:692: 90 lines including whitespace and comments (threshold 80)

    Status evaluate_inverted_index(
           ^

@xiaokang xiaokang changed the title [improve](ip-function)improve is_ip_address_in_range for inverted ind… [improve](ip-function)improve is_ip_address_in_range for inverted index speed (#41768) Oct 30, 2024
@yiguolei
Copy link
Contributor

run buildall

1 similar comment
@amorynan
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clang-tidy made some suggestions

@amorynan
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

2 similar comments
@amorynan
Copy link
Contributor Author

amorynan commented Nov 5, 2024

run buildall

@amorynan
Copy link
Contributor Author

amorynan commented Nov 8, 2024

run buildall

@doris-robot
Copy link

TeamCity be ut coverage result:
Function Coverage: 36.30% (9460/26062)
Line Coverage: 27.83% (77866/279749)
Region Coverage: 26.50% (39950/150751)
Branch Coverage: 23.28% (20288/87134)
Coverage Report: http://coverage.selectdb-in.cc/coverage/b64e0c5914960ef53f0ba53b6065d103a4027577_b64e0c5914960ef53f0ba53b6065d103a4027577/report/index.html

@amorynan
Copy link
Contributor Author

amorynan commented Nov 8, 2024

run p0

@amorynan
Copy link
Contributor Author

amorynan commented Nov 8, 2024

run external

@yiguolei yiguolei force-pushed the pick_41768_to_doris_branch-2.1 branch from b64e0c5 to cc29b78 Compare December 10, 2024 07:30
@yiguolei
Copy link
Contributor

run buildall

@doris-robot
Copy link

TeamCity be ut coverage result:
Function Coverage: 36.49% (9563/26210)
Line Coverage: 27.90% (78530/281471)
Region Coverage: 26.58% (40315/151700)
Branch Coverage: 23.33% (20419/87528)
Coverage Report: http://coverage.selectdb-in.cc/coverage/cc29b78cd7770530000d5f34472509211fca2cf0_cc29b78cd7770530000d5f34472509211fca2cf0/report/index.html

@yiguolei yiguolei closed this Feb 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants