Skip to content

Conversation

@morrySnow
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Related PR: #41607

Problem Summary:

should not reset variable version when replay edit log

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test
    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
set global enable_fallback_to_original_planner=true;

and then restart FE, this variable do not be set to false again.

  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

related PR apache#41607

should not reset variable version when replay edit log
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Dec 19, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@morrySnow
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@morrySnow morrySnow merged commit 62ff850 into apache:master Dec 20, 2024
33 of 34 checks passed
@morrySnow morrySnow deleted the fix_force_update_variable branch December 20, 2024 04:03
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve?

Related PR: #41607

Problem Summary:

should not reset variable version when replay edit log
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve?

Related PR: #41607

Problem Summary:

should not reset variable version when replay edit log
morrySnow added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2024
…#45648 (#45696)

Cherry-picked from #45648

Co-authored-by: morrySnow <zhangwenxin@selectdb.com>
morrySnow added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2024
…#45648 (#45695)

Cherry-picked from #45648

Co-authored-by: morrySnow <zhangwenxin@selectdb.com>
morrySnow added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2025
### What problem does this PR solve?

Related PR: #41607 #45648

Problem Summary:
org.apache.doris.qe.GlobalVariable#getPersistentGlobalVarNames should
use bit and to check whether variable is Global
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2025
### What problem does this PR solve?

Related PR: #41607 #45648

Problem Summary:
org.apache.doris.qe.GlobalVariable#getPersistentGlobalVarNames should
use bit and to check whether variable is Global
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2025
### What problem does this PR solve?

Related PR: #41607 #45648

Problem Summary:
org.apache.doris.qe.GlobalVariable#getPersistentGlobalVarNames should
use bit and to check whether variable is Global
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. dev/2.1.8-merged dev/3.0.4-merged p0_b reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants