Skip to content

Conversation

@LiBinfeng-01
Copy link
Contributor

pick: #46065
Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #35637

Problem Summary:
When cast("201-01-01" as datetimev2(0)), The result is "2020-01-01" but it is wrong. It should be result in "0201-01-01".
201 would be regarded as 20xy-0z as related pr show, it was a bug. But actually it should not have this trasformation and result in

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@LiBinfeng-01
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@LiBinfeng-01
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: apache#35637

Problem Summary:
When cast("201-01-01" as datetimev2(0)), The result is "2020-01-01" but
it is wrong. It should be result in "0201-01-01".
201 would be regarded as 20xy-0z as related pr show, it was a bug. But
actually it should not have this trasformation and result in
@LiBinfeng-01
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@morrySnow morrySnow merged commit 4f41bad into apache:branch-2.1 Jan 9, 2025
18 of 19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants