Skip to content

branch-3.0: [fix](jdbc catalog) Use factory methods to return mapped types instead 2 #48541 #48585

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
dataroaring merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2025
Merged

branch-3.0: [fix](jdbc catalog) Use factory methods to return mapped types instead 2 #48541 #48585

dataroaring merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2025

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Cherry-picked from #48541

@zy-kkk
[fix](jdbc catalog) Use factory methods to return mapped types instea…
c723bfa 
…d 2 (#48541)

Related PR: #46623

Problem Summary:

We should use factory methods to create types instead of returning a
type directly, because the returned type is static and final, which will
cause problems with length setting.


external_table_p0/jdbc/type_test/select/test_doris_all_types_select.groovy
will occasionally fail due to this problem
@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from dataroaring as a code owner March 3, 2025 14:27
@Thearas
Copy link
Contributor

Thearas commented Mar 3, 2025

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@dataroaring dataroaring closed this Mar 3, 2025
@dataroaring dataroaring reopened this Mar 3, 2025
@Thearas
Copy link
Contributor

Thearas commented Mar 3, 2025

run buildall

dataroaring
dataroaring approved these changes Mar 4, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@dataroaring dataroaring left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dataroaring dataroaring merged commit b1a1119 into branch-3.0 Mar 4, 2025
22 of 24 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the auto-pick-48541-branch-3.0 branch March 4, 2025 13:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@dataroaring dataroaring dataroaring approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@Thearas @dataroaring @zy-kkk