Skip to content

Conversation

@Mryange
Copy link
Contributor

@Mryange Mryange commented Mar 19, 2025

What problem does this PR solve?

#48288

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

Mryange added 2 commits March 19, 2025 17:35
…en input Const(Nullable) column (apache#48288)

### What problem does this PR solve?

error code 
```
        ColumnPtr nested_column = column;
        if (column) {
            nested_column = nested_column->convert_to_full_column_if_const();
            const auto* source_column = assert_cast<const ColumnNullable*>(nested_column.get());
            nested_column = source_column->get_nested_column_ptr();
```

If column is a const(nullable) column, 
execute: nested_column =
nested_column->convert_to_full_column_if_const();
nested_column points to a new nullable column. 
Execute: const auto* source_column = assert_cast<const
ColumnNullable*>(nested_column.get());
source_column, this raw pointer, points to the new nullable column (but
does not have ownership).
Execute: nested_column = source_column->get_nested_column_ptr(); 
nested_column points to the nested column of the new nullable column,
and the original nullable column is released.




### Release note

None

### Check List (For Author)

- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
    - [ ] Regression test
    - [x] Unit Test
    - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
        - [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
        - [ ] No code files have been changed.
        - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason?  -->

- Behavior changed:
    - [x] No.
    - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->

- Does this need documentation?
    - [x] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
apache/doris-website#1214 -->

### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

- [x] Confirm the release note
- [x] Confirm test cases
- [x] Confirm document
- [x] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
@Mryange Mryange requested a review from yiguolei as a code owner March 19, 2025 09:38
@Mryange
Copy link
Contributor Author

Mryange commented Mar 19, 2025

run buildall

@Thearas
Copy link
Contributor

Thearas commented Mar 19, 2025

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@doris-robot
Copy link

BE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 100.00% (2/2) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 37.32% (9833/26347)
Line Coverage 29.00% (82337/283918)
Region Coverage 27.62% (42248/152953)
Branch Coverage 24.39% (21514/88222)

@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit f771a42 into apache:branch-2.1 Mar 20, 2025
21 of 23 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants