-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
[improvement](show) Support that user can use show data skew statement instead of admin #7914
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…t instead of admin
|
ut failed cc @EmmyMiao87 show data skew cc @morningman cc @qidaye |
| for (int i = 0; i < tabletIds.size(); i++) { | ||
| Tablet tablet = mIndex.getTablet(tabletIds.get(i)); | ||
| long dataSize = tablet.getDataSize(false); | ||
| long dataSize = tablet.getDataSize(true); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe single replica is better ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
now,just according to the average data size column,here should compute average data size
|
The document could not be built correctly |
| "SHOW CREATE FUNCTION", | ||
| "SHOW CREATE ROUTINE LOAD", | ||
| "SHOW DATA", | ||
| "SHOW DATA SKEW", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This name must be same as the name of document ~
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
morningman
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
|
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
Proposed changes
Issue Number: close #7913
Problem Summary:
This PR mainly do two things:
Checklist(Required)
Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...