-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
Add graceful shutdown timeout for Jetty #5429
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
drcrallen
merged 16 commits into
apache:master
from
drcrallen:shutdown/cleanShutdownNiketh
Mar 23, 2018
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
228d69b
Add graceful shutdown timeout
niketh e9d329a
Handle interruptedException
niketh 4f09b3f
Incorporate code review comments
niketh 42a7d31
Address code review comments
niketh 127ed33
Poll for activeConnections to be zero
niketh 0d07ba5
Use statistics handler to get active requests
niketh 69f27cb
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into shutdown/cleanShu…
cda0698
Use native jetty shutdown gracefully
0048c0a
Move log line back to where it was
e695190
Add unannounce wait time
6317dac
Make the default retain prior behavior
efde5ba
Update docs with new config defaults
94c8699
Make duration handling on jetty shutdown more consistent
2919aa3
StatisticsHandler is a wrapper
9714efa
Move jetty lifecycle error logging to error
8e4ba24
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into shutdown/cleanShu…
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So if an
InterrupedExceptionoccurs which means this thread wakes up beforeunannounceDelay,serverwon't be stopped. Is this desirable? Maybe better to stopserveranyway?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think that is desired here. The reason that
stop()would be called is because the lifecycle is shutting down, aka there is already an interrupt requested.If there's ANOTHER interrupt coming in, I would think it essentially means "You are going to get a
kill -9if you don't exit right now" in which case continuing on with the lifecycle shutdowns in a best effort stopping seems like the thing to do