-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
Thread.sleep() method is replaced with Awaitility #8725
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
shreyanshR7
wants to merge
13
commits into
apache:main
from
shreyanshR7:Replace-Thread.sleep()-usage-in-test-code-with-Awaitility-#7154
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7965c31
Thread.sleep() method is replaced with Awaitility
shreyanshR7 4220218
Update TestIcebergSourceContinuous.java
shreyanshR7 a9a038c
Update TestStreamingMonitorFunction.java
shreyanshR7 a5408b7
Update TestIcebergSourceContinuous.java
shreyanshR7 187f0f5
Update TestStreamingMonitorFunction.java
shreyanshR7 ece224e
Update TestStreamingMonitorFunction.java
shreyanshR7 953ccb8
Update TestStreamingMonitorFunction.java
shreyanshR7 6119e5e
Update TestStreamingMonitorFunction.java
shreyanshR7 2d5a567
Update TestStreamingMonitorFunction.java
shreyanshR7 d6eb3fe
Update TestStreamingMonitorFunction.java
shreyanshR7 53e3f53
Update TestStreamingMonitorFunction.java
shreyanshR7 1f704ee
Update TestIcebergSourceContinuous.java
shreyanshR7 67c5978
Update TestIcebergSourceContinuous.java
shreyanshR7 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this goes back to my earlier comment here. We don't want to blindly just change Thread.sleep usage to Awaitility
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am new to open source , will it be ok if i replace this with simply Awaitility.await()
.atMost(WAIT_TIME_MILLIS, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)
.pollInterval(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)
.until(() -> latch.getCount() == 0); @nastra or suggest changes please.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@shreyanshR7 , I also tried to make a fix for this here . You can still continue on flink module.