Skip to content

Spark 3.5: Use Awaitility instead of Thread.sleep() #8853

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
nastra merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2023

Spark 3.5: Use Awaitility instead of Thread.sleep()

1696505
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Merged

Spark 3.5: Use Awaitility instead of Thread.sleep() #8853

Spark 3.5: Use Awaitility instead of Thread.sleep()
1696505
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.

Workflow runs completed with no jobs