Skip to content

Conversation

@tisonkun
Copy link
Member

@tisonkun tisonkun commented Aug 11, 2022

Master issue #17137

  • doc-not-needed

Signed-off-by: tison <wander4096@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: tison <wander4096@gmail.com>
@tisonkun tisonkun marked this pull request as draft August 11, 2022 06:26
@tisonkun tisonkun force-pushed the trino-disto-self-contain branch from 0c10d97 to 66cc857 Compare August 11, 2022 06:28
Signed-off-by: tison <wander4096@gmail.com>
@tisonkun tisonkun force-pushed the trino-disto-self-contain branch from 66cc857 to a3454a6 Compare August 11, 2022 06:28
@github-actions github-actions bot added the doc-not-needed Your PR changes do not impact docs label Aug 11, 2022
Signed-off-by: tison <wander4096@gmail.com>
@codelipenghui codelipenghui added this to the 2.12.0 milestone Aug 11, 2022
@tisonkun
Copy link
Member Author

Seems good. Let me handle all the remaining renaming things and try to prepare a PIP.

Copy link
Contributor

@eolivelli eolivelli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I overall agree with the patch.
I have left some comments about the PR style

@tisonkun tisonkun force-pushed the trino-disto-self-contain branch from 500af93 to 43c8c7d Compare August 31, 2022 09:41
@tisonkun
Copy link
Member Author

tisonkun commented Sep 5, 2022

/pulsarbot run-failure-checks

1 similar comment
@tisonkun
Copy link
Member Author

tisonkun commented Sep 5, 2022

/pulsarbot run-failure-checks

Copy link
Contributor

@codelipenghui codelipenghui left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work.

LGTM, I have tried on my laptop. Pulsar SQL works great.

@tisonkun
Copy link
Member Author

tisonkun commented Sep 6, 2022

Thanks for your reviews! I think this patch is ready for merge. @eolivelli @codelipenghui @nicoloboschi could you help with performing the merge?

After it's merged I'll update the corresponding docs and then we can close PIP-200 as completed.

@tisonkun
Copy link
Member Author

tisonkun commented Sep 7, 2022

/pulsarbot run-failure-checks

1 similar comment
@tisonkun
Copy link
Member Author

tisonkun commented Sep 7, 2022

/pulsarbot run-failure-checks

@tisonkun
Copy link
Member Author

tisonkun commented Sep 7, 2022

It seems broker group 2 tests don't like me, lol. Update branch and rerun.

@tisonkun
Copy link
Member Author

tisonkun commented Sep 7, 2022

Now broker group 1 tests don't like me :(

Rerun later >_<

@tisonkun
Copy link
Member Author

tisonkun commented Sep 8, 2022

/pulsarbot run-failure-checks

1 similar comment
@tisonkun
Copy link
Member Author

tisonkun commented Sep 8, 2022

/pulsarbot run-failure-checks

@tisonkun
Copy link
Member Author

tisonkun commented Sep 8, 2022

/pulsarbot run-failure-checks

3 similar comments
@tisonkun
Copy link
Member Author

tisonkun commented Sep 8, 2022

/pulsarbot run-failure-checks

@tisonkun
Copy link
Member Author

tisonkun commented Sep 8, 2022

/pulsarbot run-failure-checks

@tisonkun
Copy link
Member Author

tisonkun commented Sep 8, 2022

/pulsarbot run-failure-checks

@tisonkun
Copy link
Member Author

tisonkun commented Sep 8, 2022

@nicoloboschi I think the unrequired check status is due to your action. Do you think it's good to merge this PR now?

@tisonkun
Copy link
Member Author

tisonkun commented Sep 9, 2022

Finally!

@codelipenghui @nicoloboschi could you help with merging this XD

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

doc-not-needed Your PR changes do not impact docs

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants