Upgrade the InfluxDB storage-plugin to protocol V3

[dmsolr]

Please answer these questions before submitting pull request

• Why submit this pull request?

• Bug fix

• New feature provided

• Improve performance

• Related issues
  Make 8.0.0 Core available. New protocol and register removed. #4599
  Add influx db as an available storage option again. #4615

[wu-sheng]

I want to discuss about isTag and tagName in the Column annotation.

1. When do we need isTag?
2. Once the isTag == true, tagName could be a auto generated information, such as in the H2/MySQL storage, index name is auto generation, is there any reason, you can't do this?

The key point is, I want to make the storage more general. Like your comments of this field, Whether the column is stored as Tag on time-series DB., this is very specific, but other all existing annotation attributes are general, only search may be a little closer to the ElasticSearch as it has a better search feature.

Let's discuss this deeper, to find out whether we could reduce them or replace them with more clear name.
Because at the entity annotation level, it should not link to the storage directly so much. Otherwise, anyone wants to add a entity, need to understand all storage implementation, it will increase the bar for the contributors.

[wu-sheng]

@kezhenxu94 WDYT about this direction?

[wu-sheng]

Let's keep the limited tags today. Once we have time on the performance test, we will have more ideas about the improvements.

Let's add the e2e back.

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #4641 into master will increase coverage by 0.27%.
The diff coverage is 49.47%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #4641      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     49.12%   49.39%   +0.27%     
- Complexity     2512     2562      +50     
============================================
  Files          1267     1266       -1     
  Lines         27577    27699     +122     
  Branches       3001     3032      +31     
============================================
+ Hits          13547    13683     +136     
+ Misses        13386    13374      -12     
+ Partials        644      642       -2     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
...torage/plugin/influxdb/query/AggregationQuery.java	12.50% <0.00%> (+12.50%)	2.00 <0.00> (+2.00)
...server/storage/plugin/influxdb/query/LogQuery.java	6.34% <0.00%> (+6.34%)	2.00 <0.00> (+2.00)
...er/storage/plugin/influxdb/query/MetricsQuery.java	2.61% <0.00%> (+2.61%)	2.00 <0.00> (+2.00)
...torage/plugin/influxdb/query/TopNRecordsQuery.java	11.76% <0.00%> (+11.76%)	2.00 <0.00> (+2.00)
...r/storage/plugin/influxdb/query/TopologyQuery.java	3.50% <0.00%> (+3.50%)	2.00 <0.00> (+2.00)
...rver/storage/plugin/influxdb/query/TraceQuery.java	40.36% <25.00%> (+40.36%)	6.00 <0.00> (+6.00)
...gin/influxdb/query/ProfileThreadSnapshotQuery.java	87.50% <38.46%> (+87.50%)	11.00 <1.00> (+11.00)
.../plugin/influxdb/query/NetworkAddressAliasDAO.java	41.37% <41.37%> (ø)	3.00 <3.00> (?)
...p/server/storage/plugin/influxdb/InfluxClient.java	55.76% <50.00%> (+55.76%)	12.00 <1.00> (+12.00)
...r/storage/plugin/influxdb/query/MetadataQuery.java	52.70% <52.70%> (ø)	11.00 <11.00> (?)
... and 80 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 21bb638...365b7bb. Read the comment docs.

[kezhenxu94]

Please rewrite the docker-compose.yml to extend from the base-compose.yml, these codes should be counted in the code coverage, please refer to other docker-compose.yml or ping me if you have any problem

[dmsolr]

Now, it is ready for review. @mrproliu @wu-sheng @kezhenxu94

[kezhenxu94]

Just review the E2E part, look good to me

[wu-sheng]

If coverage is on, good to me. I am doing storage interface refactor, So, this would be changed again.

[dmsolr]

@kezhenxu94 , could you help me to see es6 always failed on e2e? I have not modified this partial. (It is also failed on #4666)

[kezhenxu94]

The InfluxDB storage test failed, and I believe it's related to the code itself, @dmsolr please confirm through the logs, there're exceptions related to the codes

[wu-sheng]

@kezhenxu94 It seems good now, Need your approve