This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 24, 2025. It is now read-only.
CLOSED - Revert "Change TO DNSSEC to SHA256"#3227
Closed
rob05c wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Closed
CLOSED - Revert "Change TO DNSSEC to SHA256"#3227rob05c wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
rob05c wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
This reverts commit cc25418.
rob05c
added
bug
Contributor
|
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): |
Member
Author
|
Included in #3205 |
mitchell852
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This reverts commit cc25418.
It looks like it's going to take more work for the whole CDN to support SHA256 DNSSEC keys. That will have to be its own project.
What does this PR do?
Fixes #(issue_number)
Which TC components are affected by this PR?
What is the best way to verify this PR?
Check all that apply