Use "twelve" as the password where "twelve12" was used

[zrhoffman]

#4764 changed the default password in some places, but not all, from twelve to twelve12. This is confusing for all of the people who are used to twelve being the default password for all components of the project. This PR reverts all instances of twelve12 to twelve.

---

Which Traffic Control components are affected by this PR?

• CDN in a Box
• CDN in a Box for Developers
• Traffic Portal
• Traffic Portal v2

What is the best way to verify this PR?

Verify the tests pass

PR submission checklist

• This PR has tests
• This PR has documentation
• This PR has a CHANGELOG.md entry
• This PR DOES NOT FIX A SERIOUS SECURITY VULNERABILITY (see the Apache Software Foundation's security guidelines for details)

[ocket8888]

I don't agree that we should knowingly use invalid data in any environment, except in a test to ensure such data is rejected by the API.

[mitchell852]

how about using password as the password? that meets the 8 character requirement. this is just used for cdn in a box, right?

[zrhoffman]

I don't agree that we should knowingly use invalid data in any environment, except in a test to ensure such data is rejected by the API.

twelve12 is in invalid_passwords.txt (as is twelve), it would be rejected by the API. But using twelve12 detracts from usability, and keeping twelve does not.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 65.64%. Comparing base (7a3e1e0) to head (e2ebbce).
⚠️ Report is 181 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #7149       +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage     28.96%   65.64%   +36.68%     
  Complexity       98       98               
=============================================
  Files           602      323      -279     
  Lines         77452    12836    -64616     
  Branches         90      970      +880     
=============================================
- Hits          22432     8426    -14006     
+ Misses        52926     4050    -48876     
+ Partials       2094      360     -1734     

Flag	Coverage Δ
golib_unit	?
grove_unit	?
t3c_unit	?
traffic_monitor_unit	?
traffic_ops_unit	?
traffic_portal_v2	74.35% <100.00%> (?)
traffic_stats_unit	?
unit_tests	74.35% <100.00%> (+48.55%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[ocket8888]

If twelve12 would be rejected by the API then it shouldn't be in use either. It does, at least, meet the requirements in TP(v1), but really we should have a password that will be accepted. Like twelve12! (I hope; I didn't check).