Skip to content

Conversation

@Lunderberg
Copy link
Contributor

@Lunderberg Lunderberg commented Aug 31, 2022

Previously, the argument needed to be an integer specifying the index into the read/write regions of a block. Now, the argument can be a string specifying the name of the buffer, or the Buffer object itself. This is a follow-up from #11624.

cc @Hzfengsy @junrushao1994

Previously, the argument needed to be an integer specifying the index
into the read/write regions of a block.  Now, the argument can be a
string specifying the name of the buffer, or the Buffer object itself.
This is a follow-up from apache#11624.
@Lunderberg Lunderberg force-pushed the tir_cache_read_write_string_arg branch from 0ffe02d to ffa9e7b Compare August 31, 2022 18:24
@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from Hzfengsy August 31, 2022 18:25
Copy link
Member

@Hzfengsy Hzfengsy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Hzfengsy Hzfengsy merged commit c6516a5 into apache:main Sep 1, 2022
@Hzfengsy
Copy link
Member

Hzfengsy commented Sep 1, 2022

Thanks for the UX improvement

@Lunderberg Lunderberg deleted the tir_cache_read_write_string_arg branch September 1, 2022 14:46
xinetzone pushed a commit to daobook/tvm that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2022
…che#12661)

Previously, the argument needed to be an integer specifying the index
into the read/write regions of a block.  Now, the argument can be a
string specifying the name of the buffer, or the Buffer object itself.
This is a follow-up from apache#11624.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants