Skip to content

Conversation

@listout
Copy link

@listout listout commented Jul 29, 2023

Clang 16 (and likely GCC 13) enables -Wimplicit-function-declaration by default. This results in errors such as:

signify.c:144:6: error: call to undeclared function 'b64_pton'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
if (b64_pton(commentend + 1, buf, buflen) != buflen)
^
signify.c:231:6: error: call to undeclared function 'b64_ntop'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
if (b64_ntop(buf, buflen, b64, sizeof(b64)) == -1)
^
signify.c:624:12: error: call to undeclared function 'b64_pton'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
if ((rv = b64_pton(hash, data, sizeof(data))) == -1)

A simple fix is to create a base64.h file containing the headers of the b64_* functions.

Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/894354

Clang 16 (and likely GCC 13) enables -Wimplicit-function-declaration by
default. This results in errors such as:

signify.c:144:6: error: call to undeclared function 'b64_pton'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
        if (b64_pton(commentend + 1, buf, buflen) != buflen)
            ^
signify.c:231:6: error: call to undeclared function 'b64_ntop'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
        if (b64_ntop(buf, buflen, b64, sizeof(b64)) == -1)
            ^
signify.c:624:12: error: call to undeclared function 'b64_pton'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
        if ((rv = b64_pton(hash, data, sizeof(data))) == -1)

A simple fix is to create a base64.h file containing the headers of the
b64_* functions.

Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/894354
Signed-off-by: Brahmajit Das <brahmajit.xyz@gmail.com>
listout pushed a commit to listout/gentoo that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2023
Upstream PR: aperezdc/signify#43

Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/894354
Signed-off-by: Brahmajit Das <brahmajit.xyz@gmail.com>
gentoo-bot pushed a commit to gentoo/gentoo that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2023
Upstream PR: aperezdc/signify#43

Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/894354
Signed-off-by: Brahmajit Das <brahmajit.xyz@gmail.com>
Closes: #32097
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Copy link
Owner

@aperezdc aperezdc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it would be easier to add the function prototypes to compat.h, which would avoid needing to carry modifications of the original source files.

@listout Could you update the PR with this suggestion? Thanks in advance.

#include "sha2.h"

#include "crypto_api.h"
#include "base64.h"
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of adding a new header, wouldn't it be enough to add the function prototypes to compat.h?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants