forked from torvalds/linux
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
staging/lustre: adapt proc_dir_entry change #2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In 3.10 merge window, proc_dir_entry is now private to proc. However, Lustre lprocfs depends heavily on it and its now-gone read_proc_t and write_proc_t members. The patch largely changed the fact, and made lprocfs depend on none of proc_dir_entry private members. All lprocfs callers are converted to use the new seq_file scheme. Also lprocfs_srch is removed so that we can drop lprocfs_lock. All callers are changed to save created pde in proper place. See https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3319 for more details. Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <tao.peng@emc.com>
bergwolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2013
This can easily be triggered if a new CPU is added (via ACPI hotplug mechanism) and from user-space you do: echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/online (or wait for UDEV to do it) on a newly appeared physical CPU. The deadlock is that the "store_online" in drivers/base/cpu.c takes the cpu_hotplug_driver_lock() lock, then calls "cpu_up". "cpu_up" eventually ends up calling "save_mc_for_early" which also takes the cpu_hotplug_driver_lock() lock. And here is that lockdep thinks of it: smpboot: Stack at about ffff880075c39f44 smpboot: CPU3: has booted. microcode: CPU3 sig=0x206a7, pf=0x2, revision=0x25 ============================================= [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 3.9.0upstream-10129-g167af0e #1 Not tainted --------------------------------------------- sh/2487 is trying to acquire lock: (x86_cpu_hotplug_driver_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81075512>] cpu_hotplug_driver_lock+0x12/0x20 but task is already holding lock: (x86_cpu_hotplug_driver_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81075512>] cpu_hotplug_driver_lock+0x12/0x20 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(x86_cpu_hotplug_driver_mutex); lock(x86_cpu_hotplug_driver_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 6 locks held by sh/2487: #0: (sb_writers#5){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff811ca48d>] vfs_write+0x17d/0x190 #1: (&buffer->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff812464ef>] sysfs_write_file+0x3f/0x160 #2: (s_active#20){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81246578>] sysfs_write_file+0xc8/0x160 #3: (x86_cpu_hotplug_driver_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81075512>] cpu_hotplug_driver_lock+0x12/0x20 #4: (cpu_add_remove_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810961c2>] cpu_maps_update_begin+0x12/0x20 #5: (cpu_hotplug.lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810962a7>] cpu_hotplug_begin+0x27/0x60 Suggested-and-Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # for v3.9 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1368029583-23337-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
bergwolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2013
An inactive timer's base can refer to a offline cpu's base. In the current code, cpu_base's lock is blindly reinitialized each time a CPU is brought up. If a CPU is brought online during the period that another thread is trying to modify an inactive timer on that CPU with holding its timer base lock, then the lock will be reinitialized under its feet. This leads to following SPIN_BUG(). <0> BUG: spinlock already unlocked on CPU#3, kworker/u:3/1466 <0> lock: 0xe3ebe000, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: kworker/u:3/1466, .owner_cpu: 1 <4> [<c0013dc4>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x11c) from [<c026e794>] (do_raw_spin_unlock+0x40/0xcc) <4> [<c026e794>] (do_raw_spin_unlock+0x40/0xcc) from [<c076c160>] (_raw_spin_unlock+0x8/0x30) <4> [<c076c160>] (_raw_spin_unlock+0x8/0x30) from [<c009b858>] (mod_timer+0x294/0x310) <4> [<c009b858>] (mod_timer+0x294/0x310) from [<c00a5e04>] (queue_delayed_work_on+0x104/0x120) <4> [<c00a5e04>] (queue_delayed_work_on+0x104/0x120) from [<c04eae00>] (sdhci_msm_bus_voting+0x88/0x9c) <4> [<c04eae00>] (sdhci_msm_bus_voting+0x88/0x9c) from [<c04d8780>] (sdhci_disable+0x40/0x48) <4> [<c04d8780>] (sdhci_disable+0x40/0x48) from [<c04bf300>] (mmc_release_host+0x4c/0xb0) <4> [<c04bf300>] (mmc_release_host+0x4c/0xb0) from [<c04c7aac>] (mmc_sd_detect+0x90/0xfc) <4> [<c04c7aac>] (mmc_sd_detect+0x90/0xfc) from [<c04c2504>] (mmc_rescan+0x7c/0x2c4) <4> [<c04c2504>] (mmc_rescan+0x7c/0x2c4) from [<c00a6a7c>] (process_one_work+0x27c/0x484) <4> [<c00a6a7c>] (process_one_work+0x27c/0x484) from [<c00a6e94>] (worker_thread+0x210/0x3b0) <4> [<c00a6e94>] (worker_thread+0x210/0x3b0) from [<c00aad9c>] (kthread+0x80/0x8c) <4> [<c00aad9c>] (kthread+0x80/0x8c) from [<c000ea80>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8) As an example, this particular crash occurred when CPU #3 is executing mod_timer() on an inactive timer whose base is refered to offlined CPU #2. The code locked the timer_base corresponding to CPU #2. Before it could proceed, CPU #2 came online and reinitialized the spinlock corresponding to its base. Thus now CPU #3 held a lock which was reinitialized. When CPU #3 finally ended up unlocking the old cpu_base corresponding to CPU #2, we hit the above SPIN_BUG(). CPU #0 CPU #3 CPU #2 ------ ------- ------- ..... ...... <Offline> mod_timer() lock_timer_base spin_lock_irqsave(&base->lock) cpu_up(2) ..... ...... init_timers_cpu() .... ..... spin_lock_init(&base->lock) ..... spin_unlock_irqrestore(&base->lock) ...... <spin_bug> Allocation of per_cpu timer vector bases is done only once under "tvec_base_done[]" check. In the current code, spinlock_initialization of base->lock isn't under this check. When a CPU is up each time the base lock is reinitialized. Move base spinlock initialization under the check. Signed-off-by: Tirupathi Reddy <tirupath@codeaurora.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1368520142-4136-1-git-send-email-tirupath@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
bergwolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2013
_enable_preprogram is marked as __init, but is called from _enable which is not. Without this patch, the board oopses after init. Tested on custom hardware and on beagle board xM. Otherwise we can get: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 000b0012 pgd = cf968000 *pgd=8fb06831, *pte=00000000, *ppte=00000000 PREEMPT ARM Modules linked in: CPU: 0 Not tainted (3.9.0 #2) PC is at _enable_preprogram+0x1c/0x24 LR is at omap_hwmod_enable+0x34/0x60 psr: 80000093 sp : cf95de08 ip : 00002de5 fp : bec33d4c r10: 00000000 r9 : 00000002 r8 : b6dd2c78 r7 : 00000004 r6 : 00000000 r5 : a0000013 r4 : cf95c000 r3 : 00000000 r2 : b6dd2c7c r1 : 00000000 r0 : 000b0012 Flags: Nzcv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment user Control: 10c5387d Table: 8f968019 DAC: 00000015 Process otpcmd (pid: 607, stack limit = 0xcf95c230) Stack: (0xcf95de08 to 0xcf95e000) de00: 00000001 cf91f840 00000000 c001d6fc 00000002 cf91f840 de20: cf8f7e10 c001de54 cf8f7e10 c001de78 c001de68 c01d5e80 00000000 cf8f7e10 de40: cf8f7e10 c01d5f28 cf8f7e10 c0530d30 00000000 c01d6f28 00000000 c0088664 de60: b6ea1000 cfb05284 cf95c000 00000001 cf95c000 60000013 00000001 cf95dee4 de80: cf870050 c01d7308 cf870010 cf870050 00000001 c0278b14 c0526f28 00000000 dea0: cf870050 ffff8e18 00000001 cf95dee4 00000000 c0274f7c cf870050 00000001 dec0: cf95dee4 cf1d8484 000000e0 c0276464 00000008 cf9c0000 00000007 c0276980 dee0: cf9c0000 00000064 00000008 cf1d8404 cf1d8400 c01cc05c 0000270a cf1d8504 df00: 00000023 cf1d8484 00000007 c01cc670 00000bdd 00000001 00000000 cf449e60 df20: cf1dde70 cf1d8400 bec33d18 cf1d8504 c0246f00 00000003 cf95c000 00000000 df40: bec33d4c c01cd078 00000003 cf1d8504 00000081 c01cbcb8 bec33d18 00000003 df60: bec33d18 c00a9034 00002000 c00a9c68 cf92fe00 00000003 c0246f00 cf92fe00 df80: 00000000 c00a9cb0 00000003 00000000 00008e70 00000000 b6f17000 00000036 dfa0: c000e484 c000e300 00008e70 00000000 00000003 c0246f00 bec33d18 bec33d18 dfc0: 00008e70 00000000 b6f17000 00000036 00000000 00000000 b6f6d000 bec33d4c dfe0: b6ea1bd0 bec33d0c 00008c9c b6ea1bdc 60000010 00000003 00000000 00000000 (_omap_device_enable_hwmods+0x20/0x34) (omap_device_enable+0x3c/0x50) (_od_runtime_resume+0x10/0x1c) (__rpm_callback+0x54/0x98) (rpm_callback+0x64/0x7c) (rpm_resume+0x434/0x554) (__pm_runtime_resume+0x48/0x74) (omap_i2c_xfer+0x28/0xe8) (__i2c_transfer+0x3c/0x78) (i2c_transfer+0x6c/0xc0) (i2c_master_send+0x38/0x48) (sha204p_send_command+0x60/0x9c) (sha204c_send_and_receive+0x5c/0x1e0) (sha204m_read+0x94/0xa0) (otp_do_read+0x50/0xa4) (vfs_ioctl+0x24/0x40) (do_vfs_ioctl+0x1b0/0x1c0) (sys_ioctl+0x38/0x54) (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x30) Code: e1a08002 ea000009 e598003c e592c05c (e7904003) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Fran=C3=A7ois <jp.francois@cynove.com> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> [tony@atomide.com: updated description with oops] Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
bergwolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2013
i2c: suppress lockdep warning on delete_device Since commit 846f997 the following lockdep warning is thrown in case i2c device is removed (via delete_device sysfs attribute) which contains subdevices (e.g. i2c multiplexer): ============================================= [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 3.8.7-0-sampleversion-fct #8 Tainted: G O --------------------------------------------- bash/3743 is trying to acquire lock: (s_active#110){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff802b3048>] sysfs_hash_and_remove+0x58/0xc8 but task is already holding lock: (s_active#110){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff802b3cb8>] sysfs_write_file+0xc8/0x208 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(s_active#110); lock(s_active#110); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 4 locks held by bash/3743: #0: (&buffer->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff802b3c3c>] sysfs_write_file+0x4c/0x208 #1: (s_active#110){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff802b3cb8>] sysfs_write_file+0xc8/0x208 #2: (&adap->userspace_clients_lock/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff80454a18>] i2c_sysfs_delete_device+0x90/0x238 #3: (&__lockdep_no_validate__){......}, at: [<ffffffff803dcc24>] device_release_driver+0x24/0x48 stack backtrace: Call Trace: [<ffffffff80575cc8>] dump_stack+0x8/0x34 [<ffffffff801b50fc>] __lock_acquire+0x161c/0x2110 [<ffffffff801b5c3c>] lock_acquire+0x4c/0x70 [<ffffffff802b60cc>] sysfs_addrm_finish+0x19c/0x1e0 [<ffffffff802b3048>] sysfs_hash_and_remove+0x58/0xc8 [<ffffffff802b7d8c>] sysfs_remove_group+0x64/0x148 [<ffffffff803d990c>] device_remove_attrs+0x9c/0x1a8 [<ffffffff803d9b1c>] device_del+0x104/0x1d8 [<ffffffff803d9c18>] device_unregister+0x28/0x70 [<ffffffff8045505c>] i2c_del_adapter+0x1cc/0x328 [<ffffffff8045802c>] i2c_del_mux_adapter+0x14/0x38 [<ffffffffc025c108>] pca954x_remove+0x90/0xe0 [pca954x] [<ffffffff804542f8>] i2c_device_remove+0x80/0xe8 [<ffffffff803dca9c>] __device_release_driver+0x74/0xf8 [<ffffffff803dcc2c>] device_release_driver+0x2c/0x48 [<ffffffff803dbc14>] bus_remove_device+0x13c/0x1d8 [<ffffffff803d9b24>] device_del+0x10c/0x1d8 [<ffffffff803d9c18>] device_unregister+0x28/0x70 [<ffffffff80454b08>] i2c_sysfs_delete_device+0x180/0x238 [<ffffffff802b3cd4>] sysfs_write_file+0xe4/0x208 [<ffffffff8023ddc4>] vfs_write+0xbc/0x160 [<ffffffff8023df6c>] SyS_write+0x54/0xd8 [<ffffffff8013d424>] handle_sys64+0x44/0x64 The problem is already known for USB and PCI subsystems. The reason is that delete_device attribute is defined statically in i2c-core.c and used for all devices in i2c subsystem. Discussion of original USB problem: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1204.3/01160.html Commit 356c05d introduced new macro to suppress lockdep warnings for this special case and included workaround for USB code. LKML discussion of the workaround: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1205.1/03634.html As i2c case is in principle the same, the same workaround could be used here. Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nsn.com> Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
bergwolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2013
This manifested as grep failing psuedo-randomly:
-------------->8---------------------
[ARCLinux]$ ip address show lo | grep inet
[ARCLinux]$ ip address show lo | grep inet
[ARCLinux]$ ip address show lo | grep inet
[ARCLinux]$
[ARCLinux]$ ip address show lo | grep inet
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
-------------->8---------------------
ARC700 MMU provides fully orthogonal permission bits per page:
Ur, Uw, Ux, Kr, Kw, Kx
The user mode page permission templates used to have all Kernel mode
access bits enabled.
This caused a tricky race condition observed with uClibc buffered file
read and UNIX pipes.
1. Read access to an anon mapped page in libc .bss: write-protected
zero_page mapped: TLB Entry installed with Ur + K[rwx]
2. grep calls libc:getc() -> buffered read layer calls read(2) with the
internal read buffer in same .bss page.
The read() call is on STDIN which has been redirected to a pipe.
read(2) => sys_read() => pipe_read() => copy_to_user()
3. Since page has Kernel-write permission (despite being user-mode
write-protected), copy_to_user() suceeds w/o taking a MMU TLB-Miss
Exception (page-fault for ARC). core-MM is unaware that kernel
erroneously wrote to the reserved read-only zero-page (BUG #1)
4. Control returns to userspace which now does a write to same .bss page
Since Linux MM is not aware that page has been modified by kernel, it
simply reassigns a new writable zero-init page to mapping, loosing the
prior write by kernel - effectively zero'ing out the libc read buffer
under the hood - hence grep doesn't see right data (BUG #2)
The fix is to make all kernel-mode access permissions mirror the
user-mode ones. Note that the kernel still has full access to pages,
when accessed directly (w/o MMU) - this fix ensures that kernel-mode
access in copy_to_from() path uses the same faulting access model as for
pure user accesses to keep MM fully aware of page state.
The issue is peudo-random because it only shows up if the TLB entry
installed in #1 is present at the time of #3. If it is evicted out, due
to TLB pressure or some-such, then copy_to_user() does take a TLB Miss
Exception, with a routine write-to-anon COW processing installing a
fresh page for kernel writes and also usable as it is in userspace.
Further the issue was dormant for so long as it depends on where the
libc internal read buffer (in .bss) is mapped at runtime.
If it happens to reside in file-backed data mapping of libc (in the
page-aligned slack space trailing the file backed data), loader zero
padding the slack space, does the early cow page replacement, setting
things up at the very beginning itself.
With gcc 4.8 based builds, the libc buffer got pushed out to a real
anon mapping which triggers the issue.
Reported-by: Anton Kolesov <akolesov@synopsys.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
bergwolf
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2013
Got bellow lockdep warning during tests. It is false alarm though. [ 1184.479097] ============================================= [ 1184.479187] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 1184.479277] 3.10.0-rc3+ #13 Tainted: G C [ 1184.479355] --------------------------------------------- [ 1184.479444] mkdir/2215 is trying to acquire lock: [ 1184.479521] (&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa06cc27c>] ll_md_blocking_ast+0x55c/0x655 [lustre] [ 1184.479801] but task is already holding lock: [ 1184.479895] (&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa06cc1b1>] ll_md_blocking_ast+0x491/0x655 [lustre] [ 1184.480101] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1184.480206] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 1184.480300] CPU0 [ 1184.480340] ---- [ 1184.480380] lock(&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock); [ 1184.480458] lock(&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock); [ 1184.480536] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 1184.480761] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 1184.480936] 4 locks held by mkdir/2215: [ 1184.481037] #0: (sb_writers#11){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff811531a9>] mnt_want_write+0x24/0x4b [ 1184.481273] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81144fce>] kern_path_create+0x8c/0x144 [ 1184.481513] #2: (&sb->s_type->i_lock_key#19){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa06cc180>] ll_md_blocking_ast+0x460/0x655 [lustre] [ 1184.481778] #3: (&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa06cc1b1>] ll_md_blocking_ast+0x491/0x655 [lustre] [ 1184.482050] Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <tao.peng@emc.com>
bergwolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2013
Pull xfs update (#2) from Ben Myers: - add CONFIG_XFS_WARN, a step between zero debugging and CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG. - fix attrmulti and attrlist to fall back to vmalloc when kmalloc fails. * tag 'for-linus-v3.10-rc1-2' of git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs: xfs: fallback to vmalloc for large buffers in xfs_compat_attrlist_by_handle xfs: fallback to vmalloc for large buffers in xfs_attrlist_by_handle xfs: introduce CONFIG_XFS_WARN
bergwolf
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2013
Got bellow lockdep warning during tests. It is false alarm though. [ 1184.479097] ============================================= [ 1184.479187] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 1184.479277] 3.10.0-rc3+ #13 Tainted: G C [ 1184.479355] --------------------------------------------- [ 1184.479444] mkdir/2215 is trying to acquire lock: [ 1184.479521] (&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa06cc27c>] ll_md_blocking_ast+0x55c/0x655 [lustre] [ 1184.479801] but task is already holding lock: [ 1184.479895] (&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa06cc1b1>] ll_md_blocking_ast+0x491/0x655 [lustre] [ 1184.480101] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1184.480206] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 1184.480300] CPU0 [ 1184.480340] ---- [ 1184.480380] lock(&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock); [ 1184.480458] lock(&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock); [ 1184.480536] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 1184.480761] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 1184.480936] 4 locks held by mkdir/2215: [ 1184.481037] #0: (sb_writers#11){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff811531a9>] mnt_want_write+0x24/0x4b [ 1184.481273] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81144fce>] kern_path_create+0x8c/0x144 [ 1184.481513] #2: (&sb->s_type->i_lock_key#19){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa06cc180>] ll_md_blocking_ast+0x460/0x655 [lustre] [ 1184.481778] #3: (&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa06cc1b1>] ll_md_blocking_ast+0x491/0x655 [lustre] [ 1184.482050] Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <tao.peng@emc.com>
bergwolf
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2013
Got bellow lockdep warning during tests. It is false alarm though. [ 1184.479097] ============================================= [ 1184.479187] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 1184.479277] 3.10.0-rc3+ #13 Tainted: G C [ 1184.479355] --------------------------------------------- [ 1184.479444] mkdir/2215 is trying to acquire lock: [ 1184.479521] (&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa06cc27c>] ll_md_blocking_ast+0x55c/0x655 [lustre] [ 1184.479801] but task is already holding lock: [ 1184.479895] (&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa06cc1b1>] ll_md_blocking_ast+0x491/0x655 [lustre] [ 1184.480101] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1184.480206] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 1184.480300] CPU0 [ 1184.480340] ---- [ 1184.480380] lock(&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock); [ 1184.480458] lock(&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock); [ 1184.480536] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 1184.480761] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 1184.480936] 4 locks held by mkdir/2215: [ 1184.481037] #0: (sb_writers#11){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff811531a9>] mnt_want_write+0x24/0x4b [ 1184.481273] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81144fce>] kern_path_create+0x8c/0x144 [ 1184.481513] #2: (&sb->s_type->i_lock_key#19){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa06cc180>] ll_md_blocking_ast+0x460/0x655 [lustre] [ 1184.481778] #3: (&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa06cc1b1>] ll_md_blocking_ast+0x491/0x655 [lustre] [ 1184.482050] Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <tao.peng@emc.com>
bergwolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2013
Don't sleep in __fscache_maybe_release_page() if __GFP_FS is not set. This
goes some way towards mitigating fscache deadlocking against ext4 by way of
the allocator, eg:
INFO: task flush-8:0:24427 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
flush-8:0 D ffff88003e2b9fd8 0 24427 2 0x00000000
ffff88003e2b9138 0000000000000046 ffff880012e3a040 ffff88003e2b9fd8
0000000000011c80 ffff88003e2b9fd8 ffffffff81a10400 ffff880012e3a040
0000000000000002 ffff880012e3a040 ffff88003e2b9098 ffffffff8106dcf5
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8106dcf5>] ? __lock_is_held+0x31/0x53
[<ffffffff81219b61>] ? radix_tree_lookup_element+0xf4/0x12a
[<ffffffff81454bed>] schedule+0x60/0x62
[<ffffffffa01d349c>] __fscache_wait_on_page_write+0x8b/0xa5 [fscache]
[<ffffffff810498a8>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x4d/0x4d
[<ffffffffa01d393a>] __fscache_maybe_release_page+0x30c/0x324 [fscache]
[<ffffffffa01d369a>] ? __fscache_maybe_release_page+0x6c/0x324 [fscache]
[<ffffffff81071b53>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x114/0x170
[<ffffffffa01fd7b2>] nfs_fscache_release_page+0x68/0x94 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa01ef73e>] nfs_release_page+0x7e/0x86 [nfs]
[<ffffffff810aa553>] try_to_release_page+0x32/0x3b
[<ffffffff810b6c70>] shrink_page_list+0x535/0x71a
[<ffffffff81071b53>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x114/0x170
[<ffffffff810b7352>] shrink_inactive_list+0x20a/0x2dd
[<ffffffff81071a13>] ? mark_held_locks+0xbe/0xea
[<ffffffff810b7a65>] shrink_lruvec+0x34c/0x3eb
[<ffffffff810b7bd3>] do_try_to_free_pages+0xcf/0x355
[<ffffffff810b7fc8>] try_to_free_pages+0x9a/0xa1
[<ffffffff810b08d2>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x494/0x6f7
[<ffffffff810d9a07>] kmem_getpages+0x58/0x155
[<ffffffff810dc002>] fallback_alloc+0x120/0x1f3
[<ffffffff8106db23>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff810dbed3>] ____cache_alloc_node+0x177/0x186
[<ffffffff81162a6c>] ? ext4_init_io_end+0x1c/0x37
[<ffffffff810dc403>] kmem_cache_alloc+0xf1/0x176
[<ffffffff810b17ac>] ? test_set_page_writeback+0x101/0x113
[<ffffffff81162a6c>] ext4_init_io_end+0x1c/0x37
[<ffffffff81162ce4>] ext4_bio_write_page+0x20f/0x3af
[<ffffffff8115cc02>] mpage_da_submit_io+0x26e/0x2f6
[<ffffffff811088e5>] ? __find_get_block_slow+0x38/0x133
[<ffffffff81161348>] mpage_da_map_and_submit+0x3a7/0x3bd
[<ffffffff81161a60>] ext4_da_writepages+0x30d/0x426
[<ffffffff810b3359>] do_writepages+0x1c/0x2a
[<ffffffff81102f4d>] __writeback_single_inode+0x3e/0xe5
[<ffffffff81103995>] writeback_sb_inodes+0x1bd/0x2f4
[<ffffffff81103b3b>] __writeback_inodes_wb+0x6f/0xb4
[<ffffffff81103c81>] wb_writeback+0x101/0x195
[<ffffffff81071b53>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x114/0x170
[<ffffffff811043aa>] ? wb_do_writeback+0xaa/0x173
[<ffffffff8110434a>] wb_do_writeback+0x4a/0x173
[<ffffffff81071bbc>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff81038554>] ? del_timer+0x4b/0x5b
[<ffffffff811044e0>] bdi_writeback_thread+0x6d/0x147
[<ffffffff81104473>] ? wb_do_writeback+0x173/0x173
[<ffffffff81048fbc>] kthread+0xd0/0xd8
[<ffffffff81455eb2>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x3e
[<ffffffff81048eec>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x55/0x55
[<ffffffff81456aac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[<ffffffff81048eec>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x55/0x55
2 locks held by flush-8:0/24427:
#0: (&type->s_umount_key#41){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff810e3b73>] grab_super_passive+0x4c/0x76
#1: (jbd2_handle){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81190d81>] start_this_handle+0x475/0x4ea
The problem here is that another thread, which is attempting to write the
to-be-stored NFS page to the on-ext4 cache file is waiting for the journal
lock, eg:
INFO: task kworker/u:2:24437 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
kworker/u:2 D ffff880039589768 0 24437 2 0x00000000
ffff8800395896d8 0000000000000046 ffff8800283bf040 ffff880039589fd8
0000000000011c80 ffff880039589fd8 ffff880039f0b040 ffff8800283bf040
0000000000000006 ffff8800283bf6b8 ffff880039589658 ffffffff81071a13
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff81071a13>] ? mark_held_locks+0xbe/0xea
[<ffffffff81455e73>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3a/0x50
[<ffffffff81071b53>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x114/0x170
[<ffffffff81071bbc>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[<ffffffff81454bed>] schedule+0x60/0x62
[<ffffffff81190c23>] start_this_handle+0x317/0x4ea
[<ffffffff810498a8>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x4d/0x4d
[<ffffffff81190fcc>] jbd2__journal_start+0xb3/0x12e
[<ffffffff81176606>] __ext4_journal_start_sb+0xb2/0xc6
[<ffffffff8115f137>] ext4_da_write_begin+0x109/0x233
[<ffffffff810a964d>] generic_file_buffered_write+0x11a/0x264
[<ffffffff811032cf>] ? __mark_inode_dirty+0x2d/0x1ee
[<ffffffff810ab1ab>] __generic_file_aio_write+0x2a5/0x2d5
[<ffffffff810ab24a>] generic_file_aio_write+0x6f/0xd0
[<ffffffff81159a2c>] ext4_file_write+0x38c/0x3c4
[<ffffffff810e0915>] do_sync_write+0x91/0xd1
[<ffffffffa00a17f0>] cachefiles_write_page+0x26f/0x310 [cachefiles]
[<ffffffffa01d470b>] fscache_write_op+0x21e/0x37a [fscache]
[<ffffffff81455eb2>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x3e
[<ffffffffa01d2479>] fscache_op_work_func+0x78/0xd7 [fscache]
[<ffffffff8104455a>] process_one_work+0x232/0x3a8
[<ffffffff810444ff>] ? process_one_work+0x1d7/0x3a8
[<ffffffff81044ee0>] worker_thread+0x214/0x303
[<ffffffff81044ccc>] ? manage_workers+0x245/0x245
[<ffffffff81048fbc>] kthread+0xd0/0xd8
[<ffffffff81455eb2>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x3e
[<ffffffff81048eec>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x55/0x55
[<ffffffff81456aac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[<ffffffff81048eec>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x55/0x55
4 locks held by kworker/u:2/24437:
#0: (fscache_operation){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff810444ff>] process_one_work+0x1d7/0x3a8
#1: ((&op->work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810444ff>] process_one_work+0x1d7/0x3a8
#2: (sb_writers#14){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff810ab22c>] generic_file_aio_write+0x51/0xd0
#3: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#19){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810ab236>] generic_file_aio_write+0x5b/0x
fscache already tries to cancel pending stores, but it can't cancel a write
for which I/O is already in progress.
An alternative would be to accept writing garbage to the cache under extreme
circumstances and to kill the afflicted cache object if we have to do this.
However, we really need to know how strapped the allocator is before deciding
to do that.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
bergwolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2013
Under certain circumstances, spin_is_locked() is hardwired to 0 - even when the code would normally be in a locked section where it should return 1. This means it cannot be used for an assertion that checks that a spinlock is locked. Remove such usages from FS-Cache. The following oops might otherwise be observed: FS-Cache: Assertion failed BUG: failure at fs/fscache/operation.c:270/fscache_start_operations()! Kernel panic - not syncing: BUG! CPU: 0 PID: 10 Comm: kworker/u2:1 Not tainted 3.10.0-rc1-00133-ge7ebb75 #2 Workqueue: fscache_operation fscache_op_work_func [fscache] 7f091c48 603c8947 7f090000 7f9b1361 7f25f080 00000001 7f26d440 7f091c90 60299eb8 7f091d90 602951c5 7f26d440 3000000008 7f091da 7f091cc0 7f091cd0 00000007 00000007 00000006 7f091ae0 00000010 0000010e 7f9af330 7f091ae0 Call Trace: 7f091c88: [<60299eb8>] dump_stack+0x17/0x19 7f091c98: [<602951c5>] panic+0xf4/0x1e9 7f091d38: [<6002b10e>] set_signals+0x1e/0x40 7f091d58: [<6005b89e>] __wake_up+0x4e/0x70 7f091d98: [<7f9aa003>] fscache_start_operations+0x43/0x50 [fscache] 7f091da8: [<7f9aa1e3>] fscache_op_complete+0x1d3/0x220 [fscache] 7f091db8: [<60082985>] unlock_page+0x55/0x60 7f091de8: [<7fb25bb0>] cachefiles_read_copier+0x250/0x330 [cachefiles] 7f091e58: [<7f9ab03c>] fscache_op_work_func+0xac/0x120 [fscache] 7f091e88: [<6004d5b0>] process_one_work+0x250/0x3a0 7f091ef8: [<6004edc7>] worker_thread+0x177/0x2a0 7f091f38: [<6004ec50>] worker_thread+0x0/0x2a0 7f091f58: [<60054418>] kthread+0xd8/0xe0 7f091f68: [<6005bb27>] finish_task_switch.isra.64+0x37/0xa0 7f091fd8: [<600185cf>] new_thread_handler+0x8f/0xb0 Reported-by: Milosz Tanski <milosz@adfin.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
bergwolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2013
This commit fixes a lockdep-detected deadlock by moving a wake_up() call out from a rnp->lock critical section. Please see below for the long version of this story. On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 16:13 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > [12572.705832] ====================================================== > [12572.750317] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] > [12572.796978] 3.10.0-rc3+ #39 Not tainted > [12572.833381] ------------------------------------------------------- > [12572.862233] trinity-child17/31341 is trying to acquire lock: > [12572.870390] (rcu_node_0){..-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff811054ff>] rcu_read_unlock_special+0x9f/0x4c0 > [12572.878859] > but task is already holding lock: > [12572.894894] (&ctx->lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff811390ed>] perf_lock_task_context+0x7d/0x2d0 > [12572.903381] > which lock already depends on the new lock. > > [12572.927541] > the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: > [12572.943736] > -> #4 (&ctx->lock){-.-...}: > [12572.960032] [<ffffffff810b9851>] lock_acquire+0x91/0x1f0 > [12572.968337] [<ffffffff816ebc90>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80 > [12572.976633] [<ffffffff8113c987>] __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x2e7/0x5e0 > [12572.984969] [<ffffffff81088953>] perf_event_task_sched_out+0x93/0xa0 > [12572.993326] [<ffffffff816ea0bf>] __schedule+0x2cf/0x9c0 > [12573.001652] [<ffffffff816eacfe>] schedule_user+0x2e/0x70 > [12573.009998] [<ffffffff816ecd64>] retint_careful+0x12/0x2e > [12573.018321] > -> #3 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}: > [12573.034628] [<ffffffff810b9851>] lock_acquire+0x91/0x1f0 > [12573.042930] [<ffffffff816ebc90>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80 > [12573.051248] [<ffffffff8108e6a7>] wake_up_new_task+0xb7/0x260 > [12573.059579] [<ffffffff810492f5>] do_fork+0x105/0x470 > [12573.067880] [<ffffffff81049686>] kernel_thread+0x26/0x30 > [12573.076202] [<ffffffff816cee63>] rest_init+0x23/0x140 > [12573.084508] [<ffffffff81ed8e1f>] start_kernel+0x3f1/0x3fe > [12573.092852] [<ffffffff81ed856f>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c > [12573.101233] [<ffffffff81ed863d>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xcc/0xcf > [12573.109528] > -> #2 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}: > [12573.125675] [<ffffffff810b9851>] lock_acquire+0x91/0x1f0 > [12573.133829] [<ffffffff816ebe9b>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x90 > [12573.141964] [<ffffffff8108e881>] try_to_wake_up+0x31/0x320 > [12573.150065] [<ffffffff8108ebe2>] default_wake_function+0x12/0x20 > [12573.158151] [<ffffffff8107bbf8>] autoremove_wake_function+0x18/0x40 > [12573.166195] [<ffffffff81085398>] __wake_up_common+0x58/0x90 > [12573.174215] [<ffffffff81086909>] __wake_up+0x39/0x50 > [12573.182146] [<ffffffff810fc3da>] rcu_start_gp_advanced.isra.11+0x4a/0x50 > [12573.190119] [<ffffffff810fdb09>] rcu_start_future_gp+0x1c9/0x1f0 > [12573.198023] [<ffffffff810fe2c4>] rcu_nocb_kthread+0x114/0x930 > [12573.205860] [<ffffffff8107a91d>] kthread+0xed/0x100 > [12573.213656] [<ffffffff816f4b1c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 > [12573.221379] > -> #1 (&rsp->gp_wq){..-.-.}: > [12573.236329] [<ffffffff810b9851>] lock_acquire+0x91/0x1f0 > [12573.243783] [<ffffffff816ebe9b>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x90 > [12573.251178] [<ffffffff810868f3>] __wake_up+0x23/0x50 > [12573.258505] [<ffffffff810fc3da>] rcu_start_gp_advanced.isra.11+0x4a/0x50 > [12573.265891] [<ffffffff810fdb09>] rcu_start_future_gp+0x1c9/0x1f0 > [12573.273248] [<ffffffff810fe2c4>] rcu_nocb_kthread+0x114/0x930 > [12573.280564] [<ffffffff8107a91d>] kthread+0xed/0x100 > [12573.287807] [<ffffffff816f4b1c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 Notice the above call chain. rcu_start_future_gp() is called with the rnp->lock held. Then it calls rcu_start_gp_advance, which does a wakeup. You can't do wakeups while holding the rnp->lock, as that would mean that you could not do a rcu_read_unlock() while holding the rq lock, or any lock that was taken while holding the rq lock. This is because... (See below). > [12573.295067] > -> #0 (rcu_node_0){..-.-.}: > [12573.309293] [<ffffffff810b8d36>] __lock_acquire+0x1786/0x1af0 > [12573.316568] [<ffffffff810b9851>] lock_acquire+0x91/0x1f0 > [12573.323825] [<ffffffff816ebc90>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80 > [12573.331081] [<ffffffff811054ff>] rcu_read_unlock_special+0x9f/0x4c0 > [12573.338377] [<ffffffff810760a6>] __rcu_read_unlock+0x96/0xa0 > [12573.345648] [<ffffffff811391b3>] perf_lock_task_context+0x143/0x2d0 > [12573.352942] [<ffffffff8113938e>] find_get_context+0x4e/0x1f0 > [12573.360211] [<ffffffff811403f4>] SYSC_perf_event_open+0x514/0xbd0 > [12573.367514] [<ffffffff81140e49>] SyS_perf_event_open+0x9/0x10 > [12573.374816] [<ffffffff816f4dd4>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2 Notice the above trace. perf took its own ctx->lock, which can be taken while holding the rq lock. While holding this lock, it did a rcu_read_unlock(). The perf_lock_task_context() basically looks like: rcu_read_lock(); raw_spin_lock(ctx->lock); rcu_read_unlock(); Now, what looks to have happened, is that we scheduled after taking that first rcu_read_lock() but before taking the spin lock. When we scheduled back in and took the ctx->lock, the following rcu_read_unlock() triggered the "special" code. The rcu_read_unlock_special() takes the rnp->lock, which gives us a possible deadlock scenario. CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 ---- ---- ---- rcu_nocb_kthread() lock(rq->lock); lock(ctx->lock); lock(rnp->lock); wake_up(); lock(rq->lock); rcu_read_unlock(); rcu_read_unlock_special(); lock(rnp->lock); lock(ctx->lock); **** DEADLOCK **** > [12573.382068] > other info that might help us debug this: > > [12573.403229] Chain exists of: > rcu_node_0 --> &rq->lock --> &ctx->lock > > [12573.424471] Possible unsafe locking scenario: > > [12573.438499] CPU0 CPU1 > [12573.445599] ---- ---- > [12573.452691] lock(&ctx->lock); > [12573.459799] lock(&rq->lock); > [12573.467010] lock(&ctx->lock); > [12573.474192] lock(rcu_node_0); > [12573.481262] > *** DEADLOCK *** > > [12573.501931] 1 lock held by trinity-child17/31341: > [12573.508990] #0: (&ctx->lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff811390ed>] perf_lock_task_context+0x7d/0x2d0 > [12573.516475] > stack backtrace: > [12573.530395] CPU: 1 PID: 31341 Comm: trinity-child17 Not tainted 3.10.0-rc3+ #39 > [12573.545357] ffffffff825b4f90 ffff880219f1dbc0 ffffffff816e375b ffff880219f1dc00 > [12573.552868] ffffffff816dfa5d ffff880219f1dc50 ffff88023ce4d1f8 ffff88023ce4ca40 > [12573.560353] 0000000000000001 0000000000000001 ffff88023ce4d1f8 ffff880219f1dcc0 > [12573.567856] Call Trace: > [12573.575011] [<ffffffff816e375b>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b > [12573.582284] [<ffffffff816dfa5d>] print_circular_bug+0x200/0x20f > [12573.589637] [<ffffffff810b8d36>] __lock_acquire+0x1786/0x1af0 > [12573.596982] [<ffffffff810918f5>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xb5/0x100 > [12573.604344] [<ffffffff810b9851>] lock_acquire+0x91/0x1f0 > [12573.611652] [<ffffffff811054ff>] ? rcu_read_unlock_special+0x9f/0x4c0 > [12573.619030] [<ffffffff816ebc90>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x80 > [12573.626331] [<ffffffff811054ff>] ? rcu_read_unlock_special+0x9f/0x4c0 > [12573.633671] [<ffffffff811054ff>] rcu_read_unlock_special+0x9f/0x4c0 > [12573.640992] [<ffffffff811390ed>] ? perf_lock_task_context+0x7d/0x2d0 > [12573.648330] [<ffffffff810b429e>] ? put_lock_stats.isra.29+0xe/0x40 > [12573.655662] [<ffffffff813095a0>] ? delay_tsc+0x90/0xe0 > [12573.662964] [<ffffffff810760a6>] __rcu_read_unlock+0x96/0xa0 > [12573.670276] [<ffffffff811391b3>] perf_lock_task_context+0x143/0x2d0 > [12573.677622] [<ffffffff81139070>] ? __perf_event_enable+0x370/0x370 > [12573.684981] [<ffffffff8113938e>] find_get_context+0x4e/0x1f0 > [12573.692358] [<ffffffff811403f4>] SYSC_perf_event_open+0x514/0xbd0 > [12573.699753] [<ffffffff8108cd9d>] ? get_parent_ip+0xd/0x50 > [12573.707135] [<ffffffff810b71fd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xfd/0x1c0 > [12573.714599] [<ffffffff81140e49>] SyS_perf_event_open+0x9/0x10 > [12573.721996] [<ffffffff816f4dd4>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2 This commit delays the wakeup via irq_work(), which is what perf and ftrace use to perform wakeups in critical sections. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
bergwolf
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2013
Got bellow lockdep warning during tests. It is false alarm though. [ 1184.479097] ============================================= [ 1184.479187] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 1184.479277] 3.10.0-rc3+ #13 Tainted: G C [ 1184.479355] --------------------------------------------- [ 1184.479444] mkdir/2215 is trying to acquire lock: [ 1184.479521] (&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa06cc27c>] ll_md_blocking_ast+0x55c/0x655 [lustre] [ 1184.479801] but task is already holding lock: [ 1184.479895] (&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa06cc1b1>] ll_md_blocking_ast+0x491/0x655 [lustre] [ 1184.480101] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1184.480206] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 1184.480300] CPU0 [ 1184.480340] ---- [ 1184.480380] lock(&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock); [ 1184.480458] lock(&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock); [ 1184.480536] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 1184.480761] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 1184.480936] 4 locks held by mkdir/2215: [ 1184.481037] #0: (sb_writers#11){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff811531a9>] mnt_want_write+0x24/0x4b [ 1184.481273] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81144fce>] kern_path_create+0x8c/0x144 [ 1184.481513] #2: (&sb->s_type->i_lock_key#19){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa06cc180>] ll_md_blocking_ast+0x460/0x655 [lustre] [ 1184.481778] #3: (&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa06cc1b1>] ll_md_blocking_ast+0x491/0x655 [lustre] [ 1184.482050] Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <tao.peng@emc.com>
bergwolf
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2013
Got bellow lockdep warning during tests. It is false alarm though. [ 1184.479097] ============================================= [ 1184.479187] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 1184.479277] 3.10.0-rc3+ #13 Tainted: G C [ 1184.479355] --------------------------------------------- [ 1184.479444] mkdir/2215 is trying to acquire lock: [ 1184.479521] (&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa06cc27c>] ll_md_blocking_ast+0x55c/0x655 [lustre] [ 1184.479801] but task is already holding lock: [ 1184.479895] (&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa06cc1b1>] ll_md_blocking_ast+0x491/0x655 [lustre] [ 1184.480101] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1184.480206] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 1184.480300] CPU0 [ 1184.480340] ---- [ 1184.480380] lock(&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock); [ 1184.480458] lock(&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock); [ 1184.480536] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 1184.480761] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 1184.480936] 4 locks held by mkdir/2215: [ 1184.481037] #0: (sb_writers#11){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff811531a9>] mnt_want_write+0x24/0x4b [ 1184.481273] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81144fce>] kern_path_create+0x8c/0x144 [ 1184.481513] #2: (&sb->s_type->i_lock_key#19){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa06cc180>] ll_md_blocking_ast+0x460/0x655 [lustre] [ 1184.481778] #3: (&(&dentry->d_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa06cc1b1>] ll_md_blocking_ast+0x491/0x655 [lustre] [ 1184.482050] Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <tao.peng@emc.com> Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bergwolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 1, 2013
The following backtrace is reported with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU:
drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_keys.c:64 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
4 locks held by kworker/0:1/56:
#0: (events){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8107a4f5>] process_one_work+0x165/0x4a0
#1: ((&wfc.work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8107a4f5>] process_one_work+0x165/0x4a0
#2: (device_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0148dd8>] ib_register_device+0x38/0x220 [ib_core]
#3: (&(&dev->lk_table.lock)->rlock){......}, at: [<ffffffffa017e81c>] qib_alloc_lkey+0x3c/0x1b0 [ib_qib]
stack backtrace:
Pid: 56, comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.10.0-rc1+ #6
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff810c0b85>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xe5/0x130
[<ffffffffa017e8e1>] qib_alloc_lkey+0x101/0x1b0 [ib_qib]
[<ffffffffa0184886>] qib_get_dma_mr+0xa6/0xd0 [ib_qib]
[<ffffffffa01461aa>] ib_get_dma_mr+0x1a/0x50 [ib_core]
[<ffffffffa01678dc>] ib_mad_port_open+0x12c/0x390 [ib_mad]
[<ffffffff810c2c55>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x105/0x190
[<ffffffffa0167b92>] ib_mad_init_device+0x52/0x110 [ib_mad]
[<ffffffffa01917c0>] ? sl2vl_attr_show+0x30/0x30 [ib_qib]
[<ffffffffa0148f49>] ib_register_device+0x1a9/0x220 [ib_core]
[<ffffffffa01b1685>] qib_register_ib_device+0x735/0xa40 [ib_qib]
[<ffffffff8106ba98>] ? mod_timer+0x118/0x220
[<ffffffffa017d425>] qib_init_one+0x1e5/0x400 [ib_qib]
[<ffffffff812ce86e>] local_pci_probe+0x4e/0x90
[<ffffffff81078118>] work_for_cpu_fn+0x18/0x30
[<ffffffff8107a566>] process_one_work+0x1d6/0x4a0
[<ffffffff8107a4f5>] ? process_one_work+0x165/0x4a0
[<ffffffff8107c9c9>] worker_thread+0x119/0x370
[<ffffffff8107c8b0>] ? manage_workers+0x180/0x180
[<ffffffff8108294e>] kthread+0xee/0x100
[<ffffffff81082860>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
[<ffffffff815c04ac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[<ffffffff81082860>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
Per Documentation/RCU/lockdep-splat.txt, the code now uses rcu_access_pointer()
vs. rcu_dereference().
Reported-by: Jay Fenlason <fenlason@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dean Luick <dean.luick@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
bergwolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 10, 2013
The MC8305 module got an additional entry added based solely on information from a Windows driver *.inf file. We now have the actual descriptor layout from one of these modules, and it consists of two alternate configurations where cfg #1 is a normal Gobi 2k layout and cfg #2 is MBIM only, using interface numbers 5 and 6 for MBIM control and data. The extra Windows driver entry for interface number 5 was most likely a bug. Deleting the bogus entry to avoid unnecessary qmi_wwan probe failures when using the MBIM configuration. Reported-by: Lana Black <sickmind@lavabit.com> Signed-off-by: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
bergwolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 10, 2013
…/kernel/git/vgupta/arc
Pull first batch of ARC changes from Vineet Gupta:
"There's a second bunch to follow next week - which depends on commits
on other trees (irq/net). I'd have preferred the accompanying ARC
change via respective trees, but it didn't workout somehow.
Highlights of changes:
- Continuation of ARC MM changes from 3.10 including
zero page optimization
Setting pagecache pages dirty by default
Non executable stack by default
Reducing dcache flushes for aliasing VIPT config
- Long overdue rework of pt_regs machinery - removing the unused word
gutters and adding ECR register to baseline (helps cleanup lot of
low level code)
- Support for ARC gcc 4.8
- Few other preventive fixes, cosmetics, usage of Kconfig helper..
The diffstat is larger than normal primarily because of arcregs.h
header split as well as beautification of macros in entry.h"
* tag 'arc-v3.11-rc1-part1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vgupta/arc: (32 commits)
ARC: warn on improper stack unwind FDE entries
arc: delete __cpuinit usage from all arc files
ARC: [tlb-miss] Fix bug with CONFIG_ARC_DBG_TLB_MISS_COUNT
ARC: [tlb-miss] Extraneous PTE bit testing/setting
ARC: Adjustments for gcc 4.8
ARC: Setup Vector Table Base in early boot
ARC: Remove explicit passing around of ECR
ARC: pt_regs update #5: Use real ECR for pt_regs->event vs. synth values
ARC: stop using pt_regs->orig_r8
ARC: pt_regs update #4: r25 saved/restored unconditionally
ARC: K/U SP saved from one location in stack switching macro
ARC: Entry Handler tweaks: Simplify branch for in-kernel preemption
ARC: Entry Handler tweaks: Avoid hardcoded LIMMS for ECR values
ARC: Increase readability of entry handlers
ARC: pt_regs update #3: Remove unused gutter at start of callee_regs
ARC: pt_regs update #2: Remove unused gutter at start of pt_regs
ARC: pt_regs update #1: Align pt_regs end with end of kernel stack page
ARC: pt_regs update #0: remove kernel stack canary
ARC: [mm] Remove @Write argument to do_page_fault()
ARC: [mm] Make stack/heap Non-executable by default
...
bergwolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 15, 2013
This was found when using pwm-led on am33xx and enable heartbeat trigger. [ 808.624876] ================================= [ 808.629443] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] [ 808.634021] 3.9.0 #2 Not tainted [ 808.637415] --------------------------------- [ 808.641981] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. [ 808.648288] swapper/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes: [ 808.653494] (prepare_lock){+.?.+.}, at: [<c027c211>] clk_unprepare+0x15/0x24 [ 808.661040] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: [ 808.666155] [<c004ec4d>] __lock_acquire+0x411/0x824 [ 808.671465] [<c004f359>] lock_acquire+0x41/0x50 [ 808.676412] [<c039ee9d>] mutex_lock_nested+0x31/0x1d8 [ 808.681912] [<c027c275>] clk_prepare+0x15/0x28 [ 808.686764] [<c0590c6b>] _init+0x117/0x1e0 [ 808.691256] [<c0019ef9>] omap_hwmod_for_each+0x29/0x3c [ 808.696842] [<c0591107>] __omap_hwmod_setup_all+0x17/0x2c [ 808.702696] [<c0008653>] do_one_initcall+0xc3/0x10c [ 808.708017] [<c058a627>] kernel_init_freeable+0xa7/0x134 [ 808.713778] [<c039a543>] kernel_init+0x7/0x98 [ 808.718544] [<c000cd95>] ret_from_fork+0x11/0x3c [ 808.723583] irq event stamp: 1379172 [ 808.727328] hardirqs last enabled at (1379172): [<c03a0759>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x21/0x30 [ 808.736828] hardirqs last disabled at (1379171): [<c03a03c3>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x13/0x38 [ 808.745876] softirqs last enabled at (1379164): [<c002ae5d>] irq_enter+0x49/0x4c [ 808.753747] softirqs last disabled at (1379165): [<c002aec3>] irq_exit+0x63/0x88 [ 808.761518] [ 808.761518] other info that might help us debug this: [ 808.768373] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 808.768373] [ 808.774578] CPU0 [ 808.777141] ---- [ 808.779705] lock(prepare_lock); [ 808.783186] <Interrupt> [ 808.785929] lock(prepare_lock); [ 808.789595] [ 808.789595] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 808.789595] [ 808.795805] 1 lock held by swapper/0: [ 808.799643] #0: (((&heartbeat_data->timer))){+.-...}, at: [<c002e204>] call_timer_fn+0x0/0x90 [ 808.808814] [ 808.808814] stack backtrace: [ 808.813402] [<c000ff19>] (unwind_backtrace+0x1/0x98) from [<c039bd75>] (print_usage_bug.part.25+0x16d/0x1cc) [ 808.823721] [<c039bd75>] (print_usage_bug.part.25+0x16d/0x1cc) from [<c004e595>] (mark_lock+0x18d/0x434) [ 808.833669] [<c004e595>] (mark_lock+0x18d/0x434) from [<c004ec1d>] (__lock_acquire+0x3e1/0x824) [ 808.842803] [<c004ec1d>] (__lock_acquire+0x3e1/0x824) from [<c004f359>] (lock_acquire+0x41/0x50) [ 808.852031] [<c004f359>] (lock_acquire+0x41/0x50) from [<c039ee9d>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x31/0x1d8) [ 808.861433] [<c039ee9d>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x31/0x1d8) from [<c027c211>] (clk_unprepare+0x15/0x24) [ 808.870930] [<c027c211>] (clk_unprepare+0x15/0x24) from [<c019f7bf>] (ehrpwm_pwm_disable+0x5f/0x80) [ 808.880431] [<c019f7bf>] (ehrpwm_pwm_disable+0x5f/0x80) from [<c019f29f>] (pwm_disable+0x27/0x28) [ 808.889751] [<c019f29f>] (pwm_disable+0x27/0x28) from [<c026f8f3>] (led_heartbeat_function+0x3f/0xb0) [ 808.899431] [<c026f8f3>] (led_heartbeat_function+0x3f/0xb0) from [<c002e249>] (call_timer_fn+0x45/0x90) [ 808.909288] [<c002e249>] (call_timer_fn+0x45/0x90) from [<c002e399>] (run_timer_softirq+0x105/0x17c) [ 808.918884] [<c002e399>] (run_timer_softirq+0x105/0x17c) from [<c002abc5>] (__do_softirq+0xa5/0x150) [ 808.928486] [<c002abc5>] (__do_softirq+0xa5/0x150) from [<c002aec3>] (irq_exit+0x63/0x88) [ 808.937098] [<c002aec3>] (irq_exit+0x63/0x88) from [<c000d599>] (handle_IRQ+0x21/0x54) [ 808.945415] [<c000d599>] (handle_IRQ+0x21/0x54) from [<c0008495>] (omap3_intc_handle_irq+0x5d/0x68) [ 808.954900] [<c0008495>] (omap3_intc_handle_irq+0x5d/0x68) from [<c000c7ff>] (__irq_svc+0x3f/0x64) [ 808.964287] Exception stack(0xc05b1f68 to 0xc05b1fb0) [ 808.969587] 1f60: 00000001 00000001 00000000 00000000 c05b0000 c0619748 [ 808.978158] 1f80: c05b0000 c05b0000 c0619748 413fc082 00000000 00000000 01000000 c05b1fb0 [ 808.986719] 1fa0: c004f989 c000d6f0 400f0033 ffffffff [ 808.992024] [<c000c7ff>] (__irq_svc+0x3f/0x64) from [<c000d6f0>] (cpu_idle+0x60/0x98) [ 809.000250] [<c000d6f0>] (cpu_idle+0x60/0x98) from [<c058a535>] (start_kernel+0x1e9/0x234) Remove non atomic clk api calls and use only atomic for enable/disable because can be called from atomic context (led_heartbeat_function is timer callback). Signed-off-by: Marek Belisko <marek.belisko@streamunlimited.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
bergwolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 15, 2013
Currently when the child context for inherited events is
created, it's based on the pmu object of the first event
of the parent context.
This is wrong for the following scenario:
- HW context having HW and SW event
- HW event got removed (closed)
- SW event stays in HW context as the only event
and its pmu is used to clone the child context
The issue starts when the cpu context object is touched
based on the pmu context object (__get_cpu_context). In
this case the HW context will work with SW cpu context
ending up with following WARN below.
Fixing this by using parent context pmu object to clone
from child context.
Addresses the following warning reported by Vince Weaver:
[ 2716.472065] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 2716.476035] WARNING: at kernel/events/core.c:2122 task_ctx_sched_out+0x3c/0x)
[ 2716.476035] Modules linked in: nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs locn
[ 2716.476035] CPU: 0 PID: 3164 Comm: perf_fuzzer Not tainted 3.10.0-rc4 #2
[ 2716.476035] Hardware name: AOpen DE7000/nMCP7ALPx-DE R1.06 Oct.19.2012, BI2
[ 2716.476035] 0000000000000000 ffffffff8102e215 0000000000000000 ffff88011fc18
[ 2716.476035] ffff8801175557f0 0000000000000000 ffff880119fda88c ffffffff810ad
[ 2716.476035] ffff880119fda880 ffffffff810af02a 0000000000000009 ffff880117550
[ 2716.476035] Call Trace:
[ 2716.476035] [<ffffffff8102e215>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x5b/0x70
[ 2716.476035] [<ffffffff810ab2bd>] ? task_ctx_sched_out+0x3c/0x5f
[ 2716.476035] [<ffffffff810af02a>] ? perf_event_exit_task+0xbf/0x194
[ 2716.476035] [<ffffffff81032a37>] ? do_exit+0x3e7/0x90c
[ 2716.476035] [<ffffffff810cd5ab>] ? __do_fault+0x359/0x394
[ 2716.476035] [<ffffffff81032fe6>] ? do_group_exit+0x66/0x98
[ 2716.476035] [<ffffffff8103dbcd>] ? get_signal_to_deliver+0x479/0x4ad
[ 2716.476035] [<ffffffff810ac05c>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x230/0x2d1
[ 2716.476035] [<ffffffff8100205d>] ? do_signal+0x3c/0x432
[ 2716.476035] [<ffffffff810abbf9>] ? ctx_sched_in+0x43/0x141
[ 2716.476035] [<ffffffff810ac2ca>] ? perf_event_context_sched_in+0x7a/0x90
[ 2716.476035] [<ffffffff810ac311>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_in+0x31/0x118
[ 2716.476035] [<ffffffff81050dd9>] ? mmdrop+0xd/0x1c
[ 2716.476035] [<ffffffff81051a39>] ? finish_task_switch+0x7d/0xa6
[ 2716.476035] [<ffffffff81002473>] ? do_notify_resume+0x20/0x5d
[ 2716.476035] [<ffffffff813654f5>] ? retint_signal+0x3d/0x78
[ 2716.476035] ---[ end trace 827178d8a5966c3d ]---
Reported-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1373384651-6109-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
bergwolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 15, 2013
Jiri managed to trigger this warning: [] ====================================================== [] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [] 3.10.0+ #228 Tainted: G W [] ------------------------------------------------------- [] p/6613 is trying to acquire lock: [] (rcu_node_0){..-...}, at: [<ffffffff810ca797>] rcu_read_unlock_special+0xa7/0x250 [] [] but task is already holding lock: [] (&ctx->lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff810f2879>] perf_lock_task_context+0xd9/0x2c0 [] [] which lock already depends on the new lock. [] [] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [] [] -> #4 (&ctx->lock){-.-...}: [] -> #3 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}: [] -> #2 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}: [] -> #1 (&rnp->nocb_gp_wq[1]){......}: [] -> #0 (rcu_node_0){..-...}: Paul was quick to explain that due to preemptible RCU we cannot call rcu_read_unlock() while holding scheduler (or nested) locks when part of the read side critical section was preemptible. Therefore solve it by making the entire RCU read side non-preemptible. Also pull out the retry from under the non-preempt to play nice with RT. Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Helped-out-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
bergwolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2013
commit 2f7021a "cpufreq: protect 'policy->cpus' from offlining during __gov_queue_work()" caused a regression in CPU hotplug, because it lead to a deadlock between cpufreq governor worker thread and the CPU hotplug writer task. Lockdep splat corresponding to this deadlock is shown below: [ 60.277396] ====================================================== [ 60.277400] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 60.277407] 3.10.0-rc7-dbg-01385-g241fd04-dirty #1744 Not tainted [ 60.277411] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 60.277417] bash/2225 is trying to acquire lock: [ 60.277422] ((&(&j_cdbs->work)->work)){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff810621b5>] flush_work+0x5/0x280 [ 60.277444] but task is already holding lock: [ 60.277449] (cpu_hotplug.lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81042d8b>] cpu_hotplug_begin+0x2b/0x60 [ 60.277465] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 60.277472] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 60.277477] -> #2 (cpu_hotplug.lock){+.+.+.}: [ 60.277490] [<ffffffff810ac6d4>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x200 [ 60.277503] [<ffffffff815b6157>] mutex_lock_nested+0x67/0x410 [ 60.277514] [<ffffffff81042cbc>] get_online_cpus+0x3c/0x60 [ 60.277522] [<ffffffff814b842a>] gov_queue_work+0x2a/0xb0 [ 60.277532] [<ffffffff814b7891>] cs_dbs_timer+0xc1/0xe0 [ 60.277543] [<ffffffff8106302d>] process_one_work+0x1cd/0x6a0 [ 60.277552] [<ffffffff81063d31>] worker_thread+0x121/0x3a0 [ 60.277560] [<ffffffff8106ae2b>] kthread+0xdb/0xe0 [ 60.277569] [<ffffffff815bb96c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [ 60.277580] -> #1 (&j_cdbs->timer_mutex){+.+...}: [ 60.277592] [<ffffffff810ac6d4>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x200 [ 60.277600] [<ffffffff815b6157>] mutex_lock_nested+0x67/0x410 [ 60.277608] [<ffffffff814b785d>] cs_dbs_timer+0x8d/0xe0 [ 60.277616] [<ffffffff8106302d>] process_one_work+0x1cd/0x6a0 [ 60.277624] [<ffffffff81063d31>] worker_thread+0x121/0x3a0 [ 60.277633] [<ffffffff8106ae2b>] kthread+0xdb/0xe0 [ 60.277640] [<ffffffff815bb96c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [ 60.277649] -> #0 ((&(&j_cdbs->work)->work)){+.+...}: [ 60.277661] [<ffffffff810ab826>] __lock_acquire+0x1766/0x1d30 [ 60.277669] [<ffffffff810ac6d4>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x200 [ 60.277677] [<ffffffff810621ed>] flush_work+0x3d/0x280 [ 60.277685] [<ffffffff81062d8a>] __cancel_work_timer+0x8a/0x120 [ 60.277693] [<ffffffff81062e53>] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x13/0x20 [ 60.277701] [<ffffffff814b89d9>] cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x529/0x6f0 [ 60.277709] [<ffffffff814b76a7>] cs_cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x17/0x20 [ 60.277719] [<ffffffff814b5df8>] __cpufreq_governor+0x48/0x100 [ 60.277728] [<ffffffff814b6b80>] __cpufreq_remove_dev.isra.14+0x80/0x3c0 [ 60.277737] [<ffffffff815adc0d>] cpufreq_cpu_callback+0x38/0x4c [ 60.277747] [<ffffffff81071a4d>] notifier_call_chain+0x5d/0x110 [ 60.277759] [<ffffffff81071b0e>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10 [ 60.277768] [<ffffffff815a0a68>] _cpu_down+0x88/0x330 [ 60.277779] [<ffffffff815a0d46>] cpu_down+0x36/0x50 [ 60.277788] [<ffffffff815a2748>] store_online+0x98/0xd0 [ 60.277796] [<ffffffff81452a28>] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x30 [ 60.277806] [<ffffffff811d9edb>] sysfs_write_file+0xdb/0x150 [ 60.277818] [<ffffffff8116806d>] vfs_write+0xbd/0x1f0 [ 60.277826] [<ffffffff811686fc>] SyS_write+0x4c/0xa0 [ 60.277834] [<ffffffff815bbbbe>] tracesys+0xd0/0xd5 [ 60.277842] other info that might help us debug this: [ 60.277848] Chain exists of: (&(&j_cdbs->work)->work) --> &j_cdbs->timer_mutex --> cpu_hotplug.lock [ 60.277864] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 60.277869] CPU0 CPU1 [ 60.277873] ---- ---- [ 60.277877] lock(cpu_hotplug.lock); [ 60.277885] lock(&j_cdbs->timer_mutex); [ 60.277892] lock(cpu_hotplug.lock); [ 60.277900] lock((&(&j_cdbs->work)->work)); [ 60.277907] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 60.277915] 6 locks held by bash/2225: [ 60.277919] #0: (sb_writers#6){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81168173>] vfs_write+0x1c3/0x1f0 [ 60.277937] #1: (&buffer->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811d9e3c>] sysfs_write_file+0x3c/0x150 [ 60.277954] #2: (s_active#61){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff811d9ec3>] sysfs_write_file+0xc3/0x150 [ 60.277972] #3: (x86_cpu_hotplug_driver_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81024cf7>] cpu_hotplug_driver_lock+0x17/0x20 [ 60.277990] #4: (cpu_add_remove_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff815a0d32>] cpu_down+0x22/0x50 [ 60.278007] #5: (cpu_hotplug.lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81042d8b>] cpu_hotplug_begin+0x2b/0x60 [ 60.278023] stack backtrace: [ 60.278031] CPU: 3 PID: 2225 Comm: bash Not tainted 3.10.0-rc7-dbg-01385-g241fd04-dirty #1744 [ 60.278037] Hardware name: Acer Aspire 5741G /Aspire 5741G , BIOS V1.20 02/08/2011 [ 60.278042] ffffffff8204e110 ffff88014df6b9f8 ffffffff815b3d90 ffff88014df6ba38 [ 60.278055] ffffffff815b0a8d ffff880150ed3f60 ffff880150ed4770 3871c4002c8980b2 [ 60.278068] ffff880150ed4748 ffff880150ed4770 ffff880150ed3f60 ffff88014df6bb00 [ 60.278081] Call Trace: [ 60.278091] [<ffffffff815b3d90>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b [ 60.278101] [<ffffffff815b0a8d>] print_circular_bug+0x2b6/0x2c5 [ 60.278111] [<ffffffff810ab826>] __lock_acquire+0x1766/0x1d30 [ 60.278123] [<ffffffff81067e08>] ? __kernel_text_address+0x58/0x80 [ 60.278134] [<ffffffff810ac6d4>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x200 [ 60.278142] [<ffffffff810621b5>] ? flush_work+0x5/0x280 [ 60.278151] [<ffffffff810621ed>] flush_work+0x3d/0x280 [ 60.278159] [<ffffffff810621b5>] ? flush_work+0x5/0x280 [ 60.278169] [<ffffffff810a9b14>] ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0x140 [ 60.278178] [<ffffffff81062d77>] ? __cancel_work_timer+0x77/0x120 [ 60.278188] [<ffffffff810a9cbd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xfd/0x1c0 [ 60.278196] [<ffffffff81062d8a>] __cancel_work_timer+0x8a/0x120 [ 60.278206] [<ffffffff81062e53>] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x13/0x20 [ 60.278214] [<ffffffff814b89d9>] cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x529/0x6f0 [ 60.278225] [<ffffffff814b76a7>] cs_cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x17/0x20 [ 60.278234] [<ffffffff814b5df8>] __cpufreq_governor+0x48/0x100 [ 60.278244] [<ffffffff814b6b80>] __cpufreq_remove_dev.isra.14+0x80/0x3c0 [ 60.278255] [<ffffffff815adc0d>] cpufreq_cpu_callback+0x38/0x4c [ 60.278265] [<ffffffff81071a4d>] notifier_call_chain+0x5d/0x110 [ 60.278275] [<ffffffff81071b0e>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10 [ 60.278284] [<ffffffff815a0a68>] _cpu_down+0x88/0x330 [ 60.278292] [<ffffffff81024cf7>] ? cpu_hotplug_driver_lock+0x17/0x20 [ 60.278302] [<ffffffff815a0d46>] cpu_down+0x36/0x50 [ 60.278311] [<ffffffff815a2748>] store_online+0x98/0xd0 [ 60.278320] [<ffffffff81452a28>] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x30 [ 60.278329] [<ffffffff811d9edb>] sysfs_write_file+0xdb/0x150 [ 60.278337] [<ffffffff8116806d>] vfs_write+0xbd/0x1f0 [ 60.278347] [<ffffffff81185950>] ? fget_light+0x320/0x4b0 [ 60.278355] [<ffffffff811686fc>] SyS_write+0x4c/0xa0 [ 60.278364] [<ffffffff815bbbbe>] tracesys+0xd0/0xd5 [ 60.280582] smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline The intention of that commit was to avoid warnings during CPU hotplug, which indicated that offline CPUs were getting IPIs from the cpufreq governor's work items. But the real root-cause of that problem was commit a66b2e5 (cpufreq: Preserve sysfs files across suspend/resume) because it totally skipped all the cpufreq callbacks during CPU hotplug in the suspend/resume path, and hence it never actually shut down the cpufreq governor's worker threads during CPU offline in the suspend/resume path. Reflecting back, the reason why we never suspected that commit as the root-cause earlier, was that the original issue was reported with just the halt command and nobody had brought in suspend/resume to the equation. The reason for _that_ in turn, as it turns out, is that earlier halt/shutdown was being done by disabling non-boot CPUs while tasks were frozen, just like suspend/resume.... but commit cf7df37 (reboot: migrate shutdown/reboot to boot cpu) which came somewhere along that very same time changed that logic: shutdown/halt no longer takes CPUs offline. Thus, the test-cases for reproducing the bug were vastly different and thus we went totally off the trail. Overall, it was one hell of a confusion with so many commits affecting each other and also affecting the symptoms of the problems in subtle ways. Finally, now since the original problematic commit (a66b2e5) has been completely reverted, revert this intermediate fix too (2f7021a), to fix the CPU hotplug deadlock. Phew! Reported-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Reported-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com> Cc: 3.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
bergwolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2013
Commits 6a1c068 and 9356b53, respectively 'tty: Convert termios_mutex to termios_rwsem' and 'n_tty: Access termios values safely' introduced a circular lock dependency with console_lock and termios_rwsem. The lockdep report [1] shows that n_tty_write() will attempt to claim console_lock while holding the termios_rwsem, whereas tty_do_resize() may already hold the console_lock while claiming the termios_rwsem. Since n_tty_write() and tty_do_resize() do not contend over the same data -- the tty->winsize structure -- correct the lock dependency by introducing a new lock which specifically serializes access to tty->winsize only. [1] Lockdep report ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 3.10.0-0+tip-xeon+lockdep #0+tip Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------- modprobe/277 is trying to acquire lock: (&tty->termios_rwsem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff81452656>] tty_do_resize+0x36/0xe0 but task is already holding lock: ((fb_notifier_list).rwsem){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8107aac6>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x56/0xc0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 ((fb_notifier_list).rwsem){.+.+.+}: [<ffffffff810b6d62>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x1f0 [<ffffffff8175b797>] down_read+0x47/0x5c [<ffffffff8107aac6>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x56/0xc0 [<ffffffff8107ab46>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 [<ffffffff813d7c0b>] fb_notifier_call_chain+0x1b/0x20 [<ffffffff813d95b2>] register_framebuffer+0x1e2/0x320 [<ffffffffa01043e1>] drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x371/0x540 [drm_kms_helper] [<ffffffffa01bcb05>] nouveau_fbcon_init+0x105/0x140 [nouveau] [<ffffffffa01ad0af>] nouveau_drm_load+0x43f/0x610 [nouveau] [<ffffffffa008a79e>] drm_get_pci_dev+0x17e/0x2a0 [drm] [<ffffffffa01ad4da>] nouveau_drm_probe+0x25a/0x2a0 [nouveau] [<ffffffff813b13db>] local_pci_probe+0x4b/0x80 [<ffffffff813b1701>] pci_device_probe+0x111/0x120 [<ffffffff814977eb>] driver_probe_device+0x8b/0x3a0 [<ffffffff81497bab>] __driver_attach+0xab/0xb0 [<ffffffff814956ad>] bus_for_each_dev+0x5d/0xa0 [<ffffffff814971fe>] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20 [<ffffffff81496cc1>] bus_add_driver+0x111/0x290 [<ffffffff814982b7>] driver_register+0x77/0x170 [<ffffffff813b0454>] __pci_register_driver+0x64/0x70 [<ffffffffa008a9da>] drm_pci_init+0x11a/0x130 [drm] [<ffffffffa022a04d>] nouveau_drm_init+0x4d/0x1000 [nouveau] [<ffffffff810002ea>] do_one_initcall+0xea/0x1a0 [<ffffffff810c54cb>] load_module+0x123b/0x1bf0 [<ffffffff810c5f57>] SyS_init_module+0xd7/0x120 [<ffffffff817677c2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b -> #1 (console_lock){+.+.+.}: [<ffffffff810b6d62>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x1f0 [<ffffffff810430a7>] console_lock+0x77/0x80 [<ffffffff8146b2a1>] con_flush_chars+0x31/0x50 [<ffffffff8145780c>] n_tty_write+0x1ec/0x4d0 [<ffffffff814541b9>] tty_write+0x159/0x2e0 [<ffffffff814543f5>] redirected_tty_write+0xb5/0xc0 [<ffffffff811ab9d5>] vfs_write+0xc5/0x1f0 [<ffffffff811abec5>] SyS_write+0x55/0xa0 [<ffffffff817677c2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b -> #0 (&tty->termios_rwsem){++++..}: [<ffffffff810b65c3>] __lock_acquire+0x1c43/0x1d30 [<ffffffff810b6d62>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x1f0 [<ffffffff8175b724>] down_write+0x44/0x70 [<ffffffff81452656>] tty_do_resize+0x36/0xe0 [<ffffffff8146c841>] vc_do_resize+0x3e1/0x4c0 [<ffffffff8146c99f>] vc_resize+0x1f/0x30 [<ffffffff813e4535>] fbcon_init+0x385/0x5a0 [<ffffffff8146a4bc>] visual_init+0xbc/0x120 [<ffffffff8146cd13>] do_bind_con_driver+0x163/0x320 [<ffffffff8146cfa1>] do_take_over_console+0x61/0x70 [<ffffffff813e2b93>] do_fbcon_takeover+0x63/0xc0 [<ffffffff813e67a5>] fbcon_event_notify+0x715/0x820 [<ffffffff81762f9d>] notifier_call_chain+0x5d/0x110 [<ffffffff8107aadc>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x6c/0xc0 [<ffffffff8107ab46>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 [<ffffffff813d7c0b>] fb_notifier_call_chain+0x1b/0x20 [<ffffffff813d95b2>] register_framebuffer+0x1e2/0x320 [<ffffffffa01043e1>] drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x371/0x540 [drm_kms_helper] [<ffffffffa01bcb05>] nouveau_fbcon_init+0x105/0x140 [nouveau] [<ffffffffa01ad0af>] nouveau_drm_load+0x43f/0x610 [nouveau] [<ffffffffa008a79e>] drm_get_pci_dev+0x17e/0x2a0 [drm] [<ffffffffa01ad4da>] nouveau_drm_probe+0x25a/0x2a0 [nouveau] [<ffffffff813b13db>] local_pci_probe+0x4b/0x80 [<ffffffff813b1701>] pci_device_probe+0x111/0x120 [<ffffffff814977eb>] driver_probe_device+0x8b/0x3a0 [<ffffffff81497bab>] __driver_attach+0xab/0xb0 [<ffffffff814956ad>] bus_for_each_dev+0x5d/0xa0 [<ffffffff814971fe>] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20 [<ffffffff81496cc1>] bus_add_driver+0x111/0x290 [<ffffffff814982b7>] driver_register+0x77/0x170 [<ffffffff813b0454>] __pci_register_driver+0x64/0x70 [<ffffffffa008a9da>] drm_pci_init+0x11a/0x130 [drm] [<ffffffffa022a04d>] nouveau_drm_init+0x4d/0x1000 [nouveau] [<ffffffff810002ea>] do_one_initcall+0xea/0x1a0 [<ffffffff810c54cb>] load_module+0x123b/0x1bf0 [<ffffffff810c5f57>] SyS_init_module+0xd7/0x120 [<ffffffff817677c2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &tty->termios_rwsem --> console_lock --> (fb_notifier_list).rwsem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock((fb_notifier_list).rwsem); lock(console_lock); lock((fb_notifier_list).rwsem); lock(&tty->termios_rwsem); *** DEADLOCK *** 7 locks held by modprobe/277: #0: (&__lockdep_no_validate__){......}, at: [<ffffffff81497b5b>] __driver_attach+0x5b/0xb0 #1: (&__lockdep_no_validate__){......}, at: [<ffffffff81497b69>] __driver_attach+0x69/0xb0 #2: (drm_global_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa008a6dd>] drm_get_pci_dev+0xbd/0x2a0 [drm] #3: (registration_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff813d93f5>] register_framebuffer+0x25/0x320 #4: (&fb_info->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff813d8116>] lock_fb_info+0x26/0x60 #5: (console_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff813d95a4>] register_framebuffer+0x1d4/0x320 #6: ((fb_notifier_list).rwsem){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8107aac6>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x56/0xc0 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 277 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 3.10.0-0+tip-xeon+lockdep #0+tip Hardware name: Dell Inc. Precision WorkStation T5400 /0RW203, BIOS A11 04/30/2012 ffffffff8213e5e0 ffff8802aa2fb298 ffffffff81755f19 ffff8802aa2fb2e8 ffffffff8174f506 ffff8802aa2fa000 ffff8802aa2fb378 ffff8802aa2ea8e8 ffff8802aa2ea910 ffff8802aa2ea8e8 0000000000000006 0000000000000007 Call Trace: [<ffffffff81755f19>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b [<ffffffff8174f506>] print_circular_bug+0x1fb/0x20c [<ffffffff810b65c3>] __lock_acquire+0x1c43/0x1d30 [<ffffffff810b775e>] ? mark_held_locks+0xae/0x120 [<ffffffff810b78d5>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x105/0x1d0 [<ffffffff810b6d62>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x1f0 [<ffffffff81452656>] ? tty_do_resize+0x36/0xe0 [<ffffffff8175b724>] down_write+0x44/0x70 [<ffffffff81452656>] ? tty_do_resize+0x36/0xe0 [<ffffffff81452656>] tty_do_resize+0x36/0xe0 [<ffffffff8146c841>] vc_do_resize+0x3e1/0x4c0 [<ffffffff8146c99f>] vc_resize+0x1f/0x30 [<ffffffff813e4535>] fbcon_init+0x385/0x5a0 [<ffffffff8146a4bc>] visual_init+0xbc/0x120 [<ffffffff8146cd13>] do_bind_con_driver+0x163/0x320 [<ffffffff8146cfa1>] do_take_over_console+0x61/0x70 [<ffffffff813e2b93>] do_fbcon_takeover+0x63/0xc0 [<ffffffff813e67a5>] fbcon_event_notify+0x715/0x820 [<ffffffff81762f9d>] notifier_call_chain+0x5d/0x110 [<ffffffff8107aadc>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x6c/0xc0 [<ffffffff8107ab46>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20 [<ffffffff813d7c0b>] fb_notifier_call_chain+0x1b/0x20 [<ffffffff813d95b2>] register_framebuffer+0x1e2/0x320 [<ffffffffa01043e1>] drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x371/0x540 [drm_kms_helper] [<ffffffff8173cbcb>] ? kmemleak_alloc+0x5b/0xc0 [<ffffffff81198874>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x104/0x290 [<ffffffffa01035e1>] ? drm_fb_helper_single_add_all_connectors+0x81/0xf0 [drm_kms_helper] [<ffffffffa01bcb05>] nouveau_fbcon_init+0x105/0x140 [nouveau] [<ffffffffa01ad0af>] nouveau_drm_load+0x43f/0x610 [nouveau] [<ffffffffa008a79e>] drm_get_pci_dev+0x17e/0x2a0 [drm] [<ffffffffa01ad4da>] nouveau_drm_probe+0x25a/0x2a0 [nouveau] [<ffffffff8175f162>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x42/0x80 [<ffffffff813b13db>] local_pci_probe+0x4b/0x80 [<ffffffff813b1701>] pci_device_probe+0x111/0x120 [<ffffffff814977eb>] driver_probe_device+0x8b/0x3a0 [<ffffffff81497bab>] __driver_attach+0xab/0xb0 [<ffffffff81497b00>] ? driver_probe_device+0x3a0/0x3a0 [<ffffffff814956ad>] bus_for_each_dev+0x5d/0xa0 [<ffffffff814971fe>] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20 [<ffffffff81496cc1>] bus_add_driver+0x111/0x290 [<ffffffffa022a000>] ? 0xffffffffa0229fff [<ffffffff814982b7>] driver_register+0x77/0x170 [<ffffffffa022a000>] ? 0xffffffffa0229fff [<ffffffff813b0454>] __pci_register_driver+0x64/0x70 [<ffffffffa008a9da>] drm_pci_init+0x11a/0x130 [drm] [<ffffffffa022a000>] ? 0xffffffffa0229fff [<ffffffffa022a000>] ? 0xffffffffa0229fff [<ffffffffa022a04d>] nouveau_drm_init+0x4d/0x1000 [nouveau] [<ffffffff810002ea>] do_one_initcall+0xea/0x1a0 [<ffffffff810c54cb>] load_module+0x123b/0x1bf0 [<ffffffff81399a50>] ? ddebug_proc_open+0xb0/0xb0 [<ffffffff813855ae>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f [<ffffffff810c5f57>] SyS_init_module+0xd7/0x120 [<ffffffff817677c2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
bergwolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2013
We used to keep the port's char device structs and the /sys entries around till the last reference to the port was dropped. This is actually unnecessary, and resulted in buggy behaviour: 1. Open port in guest 2. Hot-unplug port 3. Hot-plug a port with the same 'name' property as the unplugged one This resulted in hot-plug being unsuccessful, as a port with the same name already exists (even though it was unplugged). This behaviour resulted in a warning message like this one: -------------------8<--------------------------------------- WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:512 sysfs_add_one+0xc9/0x130() (Not tainted) Hardware name: KVM sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:04.0/virtio0/virtio-ports/vport0p1' Call Trace: [<ffffffff8106b607>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x87/0xc0 [<ffffffff8106b6f6>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50 [<ffffffff811f2319>] ? sysfs_add_one+0xc9/0x130 [<ffffffff811f23e8>] ? create_dir+0x68/0xb0 [<ffffffff811f2469>] ? sysfs_create_dir+0x39/0x50 [<ffffffff81273129>] ? kobject_add_internal+0xb9/0x260 [<ffffffff812733d8>] ? kobject_add_varg+0x38/0x60 [<ffffffff812734b4>] ? kobject_add+0x44/0x70 [<ffffffff81349de4>] ? get_device_parent+0xf4/0x1d0 [<ffffffff8134b389>] ? device_add+0xc9/0x650 -------------------8<--------------------------------------- Instead of relying on guest applications to release all references to the ports, we should go ahead and unregister the port from all the core layers. Any open/read calls on the port will then just return errors, and an unplug/plug operation on the host will succeed as expected. This also caused buggy behaviour in case of the device removal (not just a port): when the device was removed (which means all ports on that device are removed automatically as well), the ports with active users would clean up only when the last references were dropped -- and it would be too late then to be referencing char device pointers, resulting in oopses: -------------------8<--------------------------------------- PID: 6162 TASK: ffff8801147ad500 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "cat" #0 [ffff88011b9d5a90] machine_kexec at ffffffff8103232b #1 [ffff88011b9d5af0] crash_kexec at ffffffff810b9322 #2 [ffff88011b9d5bc0] oops_end at ffffffff814f4a50 #3 [ffff88011b9d5bf0] die at ffffffff8100f26b #4 [ffff88011b9d5c20] do_general_protection at ffffffff814f45e2 #5 [ffff88011b9d5c50] general_protection at ffffffff814f3db5 [exception RIP: strlen+2] RIP: ffffffff81272ae2 RSP: ffff88011b9d5d00 RFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880118901c18 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff88011799982c RSI: 00000000000000d0 RDI: 3a303030302f3030 RBP: ffff88011b9d5d38 R8: 0000000000000006 R9: ffffffffa0134500 R10: 0000000000001000 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: ffff880117a1cc10 R13: 00000000000000d0 R14: 0000000000000017 R15: ffffffff81aff700 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 #6 [ffff88011b9d5d00] kobject_get_path at ffffffff8126dc5d #7 [ffff88011b9d5d40] kobject_uevent_env at ffffffff8126e551 #8 [ffff88011b9d5dd0] kobject_uevent at ffffffff8126e9eb #9 [ffff88011b9d5de0] device_del at ffffffff813440c7 -------------------8<--------------------------------------- So clean up when we have all the context, and all that's left to do when the references to the port have dropped is to free up the port struct itself. CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Reported-by: chayang <chayang@redhat.com> Reported-by: YOGANANTH SUBRAMANIAN <anantyog@in.ibm.com> Reported-by: FuXiangChun <xfu@redhat.com> Reported-by: Qunfang Zhang <qzhang@redhat.com> Reported-by: Sibiao Luo <sluo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
bergwolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2013
With the introduction of PCI it became apparent that s390 should convert to generic hardirqs as too many drivers do not have the correct dependency for GENERIC_HARDIRQS. On the architecture level s390 does not have irq lines. It has external interrupts, I/O interrupts and adapter interrupts. This patch hard-codes all external interrupts as irq #1, all I/O interrupts as irq #2 and all adapter interrupts as irq #3. The additional information from the lowcore associated with the interrupt is stored in the pt_regs of the interrupt frame, where the interrupt handler can pick it up. For PCI/MSI interrupts the adapter interrupt handler scans the relevant bit fields and calls generic_handle_irq with the virtual irq number for the MSI interrupt. Reviewed-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
bergwolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 6, 2013
…/git/linville/wireless John W. Linville says: ==================== This pull request is intended for the 3.11 stream. It is a bit larger than usual, as it includes pulls from most of my feeder trees as well... For the Bluetooth bits, Gustavo says: "A few fixes and devices ID additions for 3.11: * There are 4 new ath3k device ids * Fixed stack memory usage in ath3k. * Fixed the init process of BlueFRITZ! devices, they were failing to init due to an unsupported command we sent. * Fixed wrong use of PTR_ERR in btusb code that was preventing intel devices to work properly. * Fixed race condition between hci_register_dev() and hci_dev_open() that could cause a NULL pointer dereference. * Fixed race condition that could call hci_req_cmd_complete() and make some devices to fail as showed in the log added to the commit message." Regarding the NFC bits, Samuel says: "We have: 1) A build failure fix for the NCI SPI transport layer due to a missing CRC_CCITT Kconfig dependency. 2) A netlink command rename: CMD_FW_UPLOAD was merged during the 3.11 merge window but the typical terminology for loading a firmware to a target is firmware download rather than upload. In order to avoid any confusion in a file exported to userspace, we rename this command to CMD_FW_DOWNLOAD." Samuel's item #2 isn't strictly a fix, but it seems safe and should avoid confusion in the future. As for the mac80211 bits, Johannes says: "I only have three fixes this time, a fix for a suspend regression, a patch correcting the initiator in regulatory code and one fix for mesh station powersave." With respect to the iwlwifi bits, Johannes says: "We have a scan fix for passive channels, a new PCI device ID for an old device, a NIC reset fix, an RF-Kill fix, a fix for powersave when GO interfaces are present as well as an aggregation session fix (for a corner case) and a workaround for a firmware design issue - it only supports a single GTK in D3." Bringing-up the rear with the Atheros trees, Kalle says: "Geert Uytterhoeven fixed an ath10k build problem when NO_DMA=y. I added a missing MAINTAINERS entry for ath10k and updated ath6kl git tree location." Along with the above... Arend van Spriel fixes a brcmfmac WARNING when unplugging the device. Avinash Patil proves a couple of minor mwifiex fixes relating to P2P mode. Luciano Coelho updates the MAINTAINERS entry for the wilink drivers. Stanislaw Gruszka brings an rt2x00 fix for a queue start/stop problem. Stone Piao fixes another mwifiex problem, a command timeout related to P2P mode. Tomasz Moń corrects an endian problem in mwifiex. I'll remind my feeder maintainers to slowdown the patchflow. Beyond that, please let me know if there are problems! ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
bergwolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2013
We met lockdep warning when enable and disable the bearer for commands such as: tipc-config -netid=1234 -addr=1.1.3 -be=eth:eth0 tipc-config -netid=1234 -addr=1.1.3 -bd=eth:eth0 --------------------------------------------------- [ 327.693595] ====================================================== [ 327.693994] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 327.694519] 3.11.0-rc3-wwd-default #4 Tainted: G O [ 327.694882] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 327.695385] tipc-config/5825 is trying to acquire lock: [ 327.695754] (((timer))#2){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffff8105be80>] del_timer_sync+0x0/0xd0 [ 327.696018] [ 327.696018] but task is already holding lock: [ 327.696018] (&(&b_ptr->lock)->rlock){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffffa02be58d>] bearer_disable+ 0xdd/0x120 [tipc] [ 327.696018] [ 327.696018] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 327.696018] [ 327.696018] [ 327.696018] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 327.696018] [ 327.696018] -> #1 (&(&b_ptr->lock)->rlock){+.-...}: [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff810b3b4d>] validate_chain+0x6dd/0x870 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff810b40bb>] __lock_acquire+0x3db/0x670 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff810b4453>] lock_acquire+0x103/0x130 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff814d65b1>] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x41/0x80 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffffa02c5d48>] disc_timeout+0x18/0xd0 [tipc] [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8105b92a>] call_timer_fn+0xda/0x1e0 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8105bcd7>] run_timer_softirq+0x2a7/0x2d0 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8105379a>] __do_softirq+0x16a/0x2e0 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff81053a35>] irq_exit+0xd5/0xe0 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff81033005>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x45/0x60 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff814df4af>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x80 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8100b70e>] arch_cpu_idle+0x1e/0x30 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff810a039d>] cpu_idle_loop+0x1fd/0x280 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff810a043e>] cpu_startup_entry+0x1e/0x20 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff81031589>] start_secondary+0x89/0x90 [ 327.696018] [ 327.696018] -> #0 (((timer))#2){+.-...}: [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff810b33fe>] check_prev_add+0x43e/0x4b0 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff810b3b4d>] validate_chain+0x6dd/0x870 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff810b40bb>] __lock_acquire+0x3db/0x670 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff810b4453>] lock_acquire+0x103/0x130 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8105bebd>] del_timer_sync+0x3d/0xd0 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffffa02c5855>] tipc_disc_delete+0x15/0x30 [tipc] [ 327.696018] [<ffffffffa02be59f>] bearer_disable+0xef/0x120 [tipc] [ 327.696018] [<ffffffffa02be74f>] tipc_disable_bearer+0x2f/0x60 [tipc] [ 327.696018] [<ffffffffa02bfb32>] tipc_cfg_do_cmd+0x2e2/0x550 [tipc] [ 327.696018] [<ffffffffa02c8c79>] handle_cmd+0x49/0xe0 [tipc] [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8143e898>] genl_family_rcv_msg+0x268/0x340 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8143ed30>] genl_rcv_msg+0x70/0xd0 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8143d4c9>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x89/0xb0 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8143e617>] genl_rcv+0x27/0x40 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8143d21e>] netlink_unicast+0x15e/0x1b0 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8143ddcf>] netlink_sendmsg+0x22f/0x400 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff813f7836>] __sock_sendmsg+0x66/0x80 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff813f7957>] sock_aio_write+0x107/0x120 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8117f76d>] do_sync_write+0x7d/0xc0 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8117fc56>] vfs_write+0x186/0x190 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff811803e0>] SyS_write+0x60/0xb0 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff814de852>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 327.696018] [ 327.696018] other info that might help us debug this: [ 327.696018] [ 327.696018] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 327.696018] [ 327.696018] CPU0 CPU1 [ 327.696018] ---- ---- [ 327.696018] lock(&(&b_ptr->lock)->rlock); [ 327.696018] lock(((timer))#2); [ 327.696018] lock(&(&b_ptr->lock)->rlock); [ 327.696018] lock(((timer))#2); [ 327.696018] [ 327.696018] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 327.696018] [ 327.696018] 5 locks held by tipc-config/5825: [ 327.696018] #0: (cb_lock){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff8143e608>] genl_rcv+0x18/0x40 [ 327.696018] #1: (genl_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8143ed66>] genl_rcv_msg+0xa6/0xd0 [ 327.696018] #2: (config_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa02bf889>] tipc_cfg_do_cmd+0x39/ 0x550 [tipc] [ 327.696018] #3: (tipc_net_lock){++.-..}, at: [<ffffffffa02be738>] tipc_disable_bearer+ 0x18/0x60 [tipc] [ 327.696018] #4: (&(&b_ptr->lock)->rlock){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffffa02be58d>] bearer_disable+0xdd/0x120 [tipc] [ 327.696018] [ 327.696018] stack backtrace: [ 327.696018] CPU: 2 PID: 5825 Comm: tipc-config Tainted: G O 3.11.0-rc3-wwd- default #4 [ 327.696018] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2007 [ 327.696018] 00000000ffffffff ffff880037fa77a8 ffffffff814d03dd 0000000000000000 [ 327.696018] ffff880037fa7808 ffff880037fa77e8 ffffffff810b1c4f 0000000037fa77e8 [ 327.696018] ffff880037fa7808 ffff880037e4db40 0000000000000000 ffff880037e4e318 [ 327.696018] Call Trace: [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff814d03dd>] dump_stack+0x4d/0xa0 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff810b1c4f>] print_circular_bug+0x10f/0x120 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff810b33fe>] check_prev_add+0x43e/0x4b0 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff810b3b4d>] validate_chain+0x6dd/0x870 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff81087a28>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd8/0x110 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff810b40bb>] __lock_acquire+0x3db/0x670 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff810b4453>] lock_acquire+0x103/0x130 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8105be80>] ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0x70/0x70 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8105bebd>] del_timer_sync+0x3d/0xd0 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8105be80>] ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0x70/0x70 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffffa02c5855>] tipc_disc_delete+0x15/0x30 [tipc] [ 327.696018] [<ffffffffa02be59f>] bearer_disable+0xef/0x120 [tipc] [ 327.696018] [<ffffffffa02be74f>] tipc_disable_bearer+0x2f/0x60 [tipc] [ 327.696018] [<ffffffffa02bfb32>] tipc_cfg_do_cmd+0x2e2/0x550 [tipc] [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff81218783>] ? security_capable+0x13/0x20 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffffa02c8c79>] handle_cmd+0x49/0xe0 [tipc] [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8143e898>] genl_family_rcv_msg+0x268/0x340 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8143ed30>] genl_rcv_msg+0x70/0xd0 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8143ecc0>] ? genl_lock+0x20/0x20 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8143d4c9>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x89/0xb0 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8143e608>] ? genl_rcv+0x18/0x40 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8143e617>] genl_rcv+0x27/0x40 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8143d21e>] netlink_unicast+0x15e/0x1b0 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff81289d7c>] ? memcpy_fromiovec+0x6c/0x90 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8143ddcf>] netlink_sendmsg+0x22f/0x400 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff813f7836>] __sock_sendmsg+0x66/0x80 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff813f7957>] sock_aio_write+0x107/0x120 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff813fe29c>] ? release_sock+0x8c/0xa0 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8117f76d>] do_sync_write+0x7d/0xc0 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8117fa24>] ? rw_verify_area+0x54/0x100 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff8117fc56>] vfs_write+0x186/0x190 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff811803e0>] SyS_write+0x60/0xb0 [ 327.696018] [<ffffffff814de852>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The problem is that the tipc_link_delete() will cancel the timer disc_timeout() when the b_ptr->lock is hold, but the disc_timeout() still call b_ptr->lock to finish the work, so the dead lock occurs. We should unlock the b_ptr->lock when del the disc_timeout(). Remove link_timeout() still met the same problem, the patch: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.tipc.general/4380 fix the problem, so no need to send patch for fix link_timeout() deadlock warming. Signed-off-by: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Acked-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
bergwolf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2013
This patch adds a base infrastructure that allows SCTP to do memory accounting for control chunks. Real accounting code will follow. This patch alos fixes the following triggered bug ... [ 553.109742] kernel BUG at include/linux/skbuff.h:1813! [ 553.109766] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 553.109789] Modules linked in: sctp libcrc32c rfcomm [...] [ 553.110259] uinput i915 i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper e1000e drm ptp pps_core i2c_core wmi video sunrpc [ 553.110320] CPU: 0 PID: 1636 Comm: lt-test_1_to_1_ Not tainted 3.11.0-rc3+ #2 [ 553.110350] Hardware name: LENOVO 74597D6/74597D6, BIOS 6DET60WW (3.10 ) 09/17/2009 [ 553.110381] task: ffff88020a01dd40 ti: ffff880204ed0000 task.ti: ffff880204ed0000 [ 553.110411] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa0698017>] [<ffffffffa0698017>] skb_orphan.part.9+0x4/0x6 [sctp] [ 553.110459] RSP: 0018:ffff880204ed1bb8 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 553.110483] RAX: ffff8802086f5a40 RBX: ffff880204303300 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 553.110487] RDX: ffff880204303c28 RSI: ffff8802086f5a40 RDI: ffff880202158000 [ 553.110487] RBP: ffff880204ed1bb8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 553.110487] R10: ffff88022f2d9a04 R11: ffff880233001600 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 553.110487] R13: ffff880204303c00 R14: ffff8802293d0000 R15: ffff880202158000 [ 553.110487] FS: 00007f31b31fe740(0000) GS:ffff88023bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 553.110487] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b [ 553.110487] CR2: 000000379980e3e0 CR3: 000000020d225000 CR4: 00000000000407f0 [ 553.110487] Stack: [ 553.110487] ffff880204ed1ca8 ffffffffa068d7fc 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [ 553.110487] 0000000000000000 ffff8802293d0000 ffff880202158000 ffffffff81cb7900 [ 553.110487] 0000000000000000 0000400000001c68 ffff8802086f5a40 000000000000000f [ 553.110487] Call Trace: [ 553.110487] [<ffffffffa068d7fc>] sctp_sendmsg+0x6bc/0xc80 [sctp] [ 553.110487] [<ffffffff8128f185>] ? sock_has_perm+0x75/0x90 [ 553.110487] [<ffffffff815a3593>] inet_sendmsg+0x63/0xb0 [ 553.110487] [<ffffffff8128f2b3>] ? selinux_socket_sendmsg+0x23/0x30 [ 553.110487] [<ffffffff8151c5d6>] sock_sendmsg+0xa6/0xd0 [ 553.110487] [<ffffffff81637b05>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x15/0x20 [ 553.110487] [<ffffffff8151cd38>] SYSC_sendto+0x128/0x180 [ 553.110487] [<ffffffff8151ce6b>] ? SYSC_connect+0xdb/0x100 [ 553.110487] [<ffffffffa0690031>] ? sctp_inet_listen+0x71/0x1f0 [sctp] [ 553.110487] [<ffffffff8151d35e>] SyS_sendto+0xe/0x10 [ 553.110487] [<ffffffff81640202>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 553.110487] Code: e0 48 c7 c7 00 22 6a a0 e8 67 a3 f0 e0 48 c7 [...] [ 553.110487] RIP [<ffffffffa0698017>] skb_orphan.part.9+0x4/0x6 [sctp] [ 553.110487] RSP <ffff880204ed1bb8> [ 553.121578] ---[ end trace 46c20c5903ef5be2 ]--- The approach taken here is to split data and control chunks creation a bit. Data chunks already have memory accounting so noting needs to happen. For control chunks, add stubs handlers. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2025
Add VMX exit handlers for SEAMCALL and TDCALL to inject a #UD if a non-TD guest attempts to execute SEAMCALL or TDCALL. Neither SEAMCALL nor TDCALL is gated by any software enablement other than VMXON, and so will generate a VM-Exit instead of e.g. a native #UD when executed from the guest kernel. Note! No unprivileged DoS of the L1 kernel is possible as TDCALL and SEAMCALL #GP at CPL > 0, and the CPL check is performed prior to the VMX non-root (VM-Exit) check, i.e. userspace can't crash the VM. And for a nested guest, KVM forwards unknown exits to L1, i.e. an L2 kernel can crash itself, but not L1. Note #2! The Intel® Trust Domain CPU Architectural Extensions spec's pseudocode shows the CPL > 0 check for SEAMCALL coming _after_ the VM-Exit, but that appears to be a documentation bug (likely because the CPL > 0 check was incorrectly bundled with other lower-priority #GP checks). Testing on SPR and EMR shows that the CPL > 0 check is performed before the VMX non-root check, i.e. SEAMCALL #GPs when executed in usermode. Note #3! The aforementioned Trust Domain spec uses confusing pseudocode that says that SEAMCALL will #UD if executed "inSEAM", but "inSEAM" specifically means in SEAM Root Mode, i.e. in the TDX-Module. The long- form description explicitly states that SEAMCALL generates an exit when executed in "SEAM VMX non-root operation". But that's a moot point as the TDX-Module injects #UD if the guest attempts to execute SEAMCALL, as documented in the "Unconditionally Blocked Instructions" section of the TDX-Module base specification. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com> Cc: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com> Cc: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251016182148.69085-2-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2025
into HEAD KVM/riscv fixes for 6.18, take #2 - Fix check for local interrupts on riscv32 - Read HGEIP CSR on the correct cpu when checking for IMSIC interrupts - Remove automatic I/O mapping from kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region()
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2025
…/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm654 fixes for 6.18, take #2 * Core fixes - Fix trapping regression when no in-kernel irqchip is present (20251021094358.1963807-1-sascha.bischoff@arm.com) - Check host-provided, untrusted ranges and offsets in pKVM (20251016164541.3771235-1-vdonnefort@google.com) (20251017075710.2605118-1-sebastianene@google.com) - Fix regression restoring the ID_PFR1_EL1 register (20251030122707.2033690-1-maz@kernel.org - Fix vgic ITS locking issues when LPIs are not directly injected (20251107184847.1784820-1-oupton@kernel.org) * Test fixes - Correct target CPU programming in vgic_lpi_stress selftest (20251020145946.48288-1-mdittgen@amazon.de) - Fix exposure of SCTLR2_EL2 and ZCR_EL2 in get-reg-list selftest (20251023-b4-kvm-arm64-get-reg-list-sctlr-el2-v1-1-088f88ff992a@kernel.org) (20251024-kvm-arm64-get-reg-list-zcr-el2-v1-1-0cd0ff75e22f@kernel.org) * Misc - Update Oliver's email address (20251107012830.1708225-1-oupton@kernel.org)
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 13, 2025
When freeing indexed arrays, the corresponding free function should
be called for each entry of the indexed array. For example, for
for 'struct tc_act_attrs' 'tc_act_attrs_free(...)' needs to be called
for each entry.
Previously, memory leaks were reported when enabling the ASAN
analyzer.
=================================================================
==874==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 24 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f221fd20cb5 in malloc ./debug/gcc/gcc/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:67
#1 0x55c98db048af in tc_act_attrs_set_options_vlan_parms ../generated/tc-user.h:2813
#2 0x55c98db048af in main ./linux/tools/net/ynl/samples/tc-filter-add.c:71
Direct leak of 24 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f221fd20cb5 in malloc ./debug/gcc/gcc/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:67
#1 0x55c98db04a93 in tc_act_attrs_set_options_vlan_parms ../generated/tc-user.h:2813
#2 0x55c98db04a93 in main ./linux/tools/net/ynl/samples/tc-filter-add.c:74
Direct leak of 10 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f221fd20cb5 in malloc ./debug/gcc/gcc/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:67
#1 0x55c98db0527d in tc_act_attrs_set_kind ../generated/tc-user.h:1622
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 58 byte(s) leaked in 4 allocation(s).
The following diff illustrates the changes introduced compared to the
previous version of the code.
void tc_flower_attrs_free(struct tc_flower_attrs *obj)
{
+ unsigned int i;
+
free(obj->indev);
+ for (i = 0; i < obj->_count.act; i++)
+ tc_act_attrs_free(&obj->act[i]);
free(obj->act);
free(obj->key_eth_dst);
free(obj->key_eth_dst_mask);
Signed-off-by: Zahari Doychev <zahari.doychev@linux.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251106151529.453026-3-zahari.doychev@linux.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2025
Handle skb allocation failures in RX path, to avoid NULL pointer dereference and RX stalls under memory pressure. If the refill fails with -ENOMEM, complete napi polling and wake up later to retry via timer. Also explicitly re-enable RX DMA after oom, so the dmac doesn't remain stopped in this situation. Previously, memory pressure could lead to skb allocation failures and subsequent Oops like: Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#2] Hardware name: SonyPS3 Cell Broadband Engine 0x701000 PS3 NIP [c0003d0000065900] gelic_net_poll+0x6c/0x2d0 [ps3_gelic] (unreliable) LR [c0003d00000659c4] gelic_net_poll+0x130/0x2d0 [ps3_gelic] Call Trace: gelic_net_poll+0x130/0x2d0 [ps3_gelic] (unreliable) __napi_poll+0x44/0x168 net_rx_action+0x178/0x290 Steps to reproduce the issue: 1. Start a continuous network traffic, like scp of a 20GB file 2. Inject failslab errors using the kernel fault injection: echo -1 > /sys/kernel/debug/failslab/times echo 30 > /sys/kernel/debug/failslab/interval echo 100 > /sys/kernel/debug/failslab/probability 3. After some time, traces start to appear, kernel Oopses and the system stops Step 2 is not always necessary, as it is usually already triggered by the transfer of a big enough file. Fixes: 02c1889 ("ps3: gigabit ethernet driver for PS3, take3") Signed-off-by: Florian Fuchs <fuchsfl@gmail.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251113181000.3914980-1-fuchsfl@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2025
…ockdep While developing IPPROTO_SMBDIRECT support for the code under fs/smb/common/smbdirect [1], I noticed false positives like this: [T79] ====================================================== [T79] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [T79] 6.18.0-rc4-metze-kasan-lockdep.01+ #1 Tainted: G OE [T79] ------------------------------------------------------ [T79] kworker/2:0/79 is trying to acquire lock: [T79] ffff88801f968278 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sock_set_reuseaddr+0x14/0x70 [T79] but task is already holding lock: [T79] ffffffffc10f7230 (lock#9){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rdma_listen+0x3d2/0x740 [rdma_cm] [T79] which lock already depends on the new lock. [T79] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [T79] -> #1 (lock#9){+.+.}-{4:4}: [T79] __lock_acquire+0x535/0xc30 [T79] lock_acquire.part.0+0xb3/0x240 [T79] lock_acquire+0x60/0x140 [T79] __mutex_lock+0x1af/0x1c10 [T79] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [T79] cma_get_port+0xba/0x7d0 [rdma_cm] [T79] rdma_bind_addr_dst+0x598/0x9a0 [rdma_cm] [T79] cma_bind_addr+0x107/0x320 [rdma_cm] [T79] rdma_resolve_addr+0xa3/0x830 [rdma_cm] [T79] destroy_lease_table+0x12b/0x420 [ksmbd] [T79] ksmbd_NTtimeToUnix+0x3e/0x80 [ksmbd] [T79] ndr_encode_posix_acl+0x6e9/0xab0 [ksmbd] [T79] ndr_encode_v4_ntacl+0x53/0x870 [ksmbd] [T79] __sys_connect_file+0x131/0x1c0 [T79] __sys_connect+0x111/0x140 [T79] __x64_sys_connect+0x72/0xc0 [T79] x64_sys_call+0xe7d/0x26a0 [T79] do_syscall_64+0x93/0xff0 [T79] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [T79] -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}: [T79] check_prev_add+0xf3/0xcd0 [T79] validate_chain+0x466/0x590 [T79] __lock_acquire+0x535/0xc30 [T79] lock_acquire.part.0+0xb3/0x240 [T79] lock_acquire+0x60/0x140 [T79] lock_sock_nested+0x3b/0xf0 [T79] sock_set_reuseaddr+0x14/0x70 [T79] siw_create_listen+0x145/0x1540 [siw] [T79] iw_cm_listen+0x313/0x5b0 [iw_cm] [T79] cma_iw_listen+0x271/0x3c0 [rdma_cm] [T79] rdma_listen+0x3b1/0x740 [rdma_cm] [T79] cma_listen_on_dev+0x46a/0x750 [rdma_cm] [T79] rdma_listen+0x4b0/0x740 [rdma_cm] [T79] ksmbd_rdma_init+0x12b/0x270 [ksmbd] [T79] ksmbd_conn_transport_init+0x26/0x70 [ksmbd] [T79] server_ctrl_handle_work+0x1e5/0x280 [ksmbd] [T79] process_one_work+0x86c/0x1930 [T79] worker_thread+0x6f0/0x11f0 [T79] kthread+0x3ec/0x8b0 [T79] ret_from_fork+0x314/0x400 [T79] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [T79] other info that might help us debug this: [T79] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [T79] CPU0 CPU1 [T79] ---- ---- [T79] lock(lock#9); [T79] lock(sk_lock-AF_INET); [T79] lock(lock#9); [T79] lock(sk_lock-AF_INET); [T79] *** DEADLOCK *** [T79] 5 locks held by kworker/2:0/79: [T79] #0: ffff88800120b158 ((wq_completion)events_long){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0xfca/0x1930 [T79] #1: ffffc9000474fd00 ((work_completion)(&ctrl->ctrl_work)) {+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x804/0x1930 [T79] #2: ffffffffc11307d0 (ctrl_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: server_ctrl_handle_work+0x21/0x280 [ksmbd] [T79] #3: ffffffffc11347b0 (init_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ksmbd_conn_transport_init+0x18/0x70 [ksmbd] [T79] #4: ffffffffc10f7230 (lock#9){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rdma_listen+0x3d2/0x740 [rdma_cm] [T79] stack backtrace: [T79] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 79 Comm: kworker/2:0 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G OE 6.18.0-rc4-metze-kasan-lockdep.01+ #1 PREEMPT(voluntary) [T79] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE [T79] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [T79] Workqueue: events_long server_ctrl_handle_work [ksmbd] ... [T79] print_circular_bug+0xfd/0x130 [T79] check_noncircular+0x150/0x170 [T79] check_prev_add+0xf3/0xcd0 [T79] validate_chain+0x466/0x590 [T79] __lock_acquire+0x535/0xc30 [T79] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [T79] lock_acquire.part.0+0xb3/0x240 [T79] ? sock_set_reuseaddr+0x14/0x70 [T79] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [T79] ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x30 [T79] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [T79] ? apparmor_socket_post_create+0x180/0x700 [T79] lock_acquire+0x60/0x140 [T79] ? sock_set_reuseaddr+0x14/0x70 [T79] lock_sock_nested+0x3b/0xf0 [T79] ? sock_set_reuseaddr+0x14/0x70 [T79] sock_set_reuseaddr+0x14/0x70 [T79] siw_create_listen+0x145/0x1540 [siw] [T79] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [T79] ? local_clock_noinstr+0xe/0xd0 [T79] ? __pfx_siw_create_listen+0x10/0x10 [siw] [T79] ? trace_preempt_on+0x4c/0x130 [T79] ? __raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4a/0x90 [T79] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [T79] ? preempt_count_sub+0x52/0x80 [T79] iw_cm_listen+0x313/0x5b0 [iw_cm] [T79] cma_iw_listen+0x271/0x3c0 [rdma_cm] [T79] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [T79] rdma_listen+0x3b1/0x740 [rdma_cm] [T79] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2c/0x60 [T79] ? __pfx_rdma_listen+0x10/0x10 [rdma_cm] [T79] ? rdma_restrack_add+0x12c/0x630 [ib_core] [T79] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [T79] cma_listen_on_dev+0x46a/0x750 [rdma_cm] [T79] rdma_listen+0x4b0/0x740 [rdma_cm] [T79] ? __pfx_rdma_listen+0x10/0x10 [rdma_cm] [T79] ? cma_get_port+0x30d/0x7d0 [rdma_cm] [T79] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [T79] ? rdma_bind_addr_dst+0x598/0x9a0 [rdma_cm] [T79] ksmbd_rdma_init+0x12b/0x270 [ksmbd] [T79] ? __pfx_ksmbd_rdma_init+0x10/0x10 [ksmbd] [T79] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [T79] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [T79] ? register_netdevice_notifier+0x1dc/0x240 [T79] ksmbd_conn_transport_init+0x26/0x70 [ksmbd] [T79] server_ctrl_handle_work+0x1e5/0x280 [ksmbd] [T79] process_one_work+0x86c/0x1930 [T79] ? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10 [T79] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [T79] ? assign_work+0x16f/0x280 [T79] worker_thread+0x6f0/0x11f0 I was not able to reproduce this as I was testing with various runs switching siw and rxe as well as IPPROTO_SMBDIRECT sockets, while the above stack used siw with the non IPPROTO_SMBDIRECT patches [1]. Even if this patch doesn't solve the above I think it's a good idea to reclassify the sockets used by siw, I also send patches for rxe to reclassify, as well as my IPPROTO_SMBDIRECT socket patches [1] will do it, this should minimize potential false positives. [1] https://git.samba.org/?p=metze/linux/wip.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master-ipproto-smbdirect Cc: Bernard Metzler <bernard.metzler@linux.dev> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251126150842.1837072-1-metze@samba.org Acked-by: Bernard Metzler <bernard.metzler@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2025
…ockdep While developing IPPROTO_SMBDIRECT support for the code under fs/smb/common/smbdirect [1], I noticed false positives like this: [+0,003927] ============================================ [+0,000532] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [+0,000611] 6.18.0-rc5-metze-kasan-lockdep.02+ #1 Tainted: G OE [+0,000835] -------------------------------------------- [+0,000729] ksmbd:r5445/3609 is trying to acquire lock: [+0,000709] ffff88800b9570f8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: inet_shutdown+0x52/0x360 [+0,000831] but task is already holding lock: [+0,000684] ffff88800654af78 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: smbdirect_sk_close+0x122/0x790 [smbdirect] [+0,000928] other info that might help us debug this: [+0,005552] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [+0,000723] CPU0 [+0,000359] ---- [+0,000377] lock(k-sk_lock-AF_INET); [+0,000478] lock(k-sk_lock-AF_INET); [+0,000498] *** DEADLOCK *** [+0,001012] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [+0,000831] 3 locks held by ksmbd:r5445/3609: [+0,000484] #0: ffff88800654af78 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: smbdirect_sk_close+0x122/0x790 [smbdirect] [+0,001000] #1: ffff888020a40458 (&id_priv->handler_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rdma_lock_handler+0x17/0x30 [rdma_cm] [+0,000982] #2: ffff888020a40350 (&id_priv->qp_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rdma_destroy_qp+0x5d/0x1f0 [rdma_cm] [+0,000934] stack backtrace: [+0,000589] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 3609 Comm: ksmbd:r5445 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G OE 6.18.0-rc5-metze-kasan-lockdep.02+ #1 PREEMPT(voluntary) [+0,000023] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE [+0,000004] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 ... [+0,000010] print_deadlock_bug+0x245/0x330 [+0,000014] validate_chain+0x32a/0x590 [+0,000012] __lock_acquire+0x535/0xc30 [+0,000013] lock_acquire.part.0+0xb3/0x240 [+0,000017] ? inet_shutdown+0x52/0x360 [+0,000013] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [+0,000007] ? mark_held_locks+0x46/0x90 [+0,000012] lock_acquire+0x60/0x140 [+0,000006] ? inet_shutdown+0x52/0x360 [+0,000028] lock_sock_nested+0x3b/0xf0 [+0,000009] ? inet_shutdown+0x52/0x360 [+0,000008] inet_shutdown+0x52/0x360 [+0,000010] kernel_sock_shutdown+0x5b/0x90 [+0,000011] rxe_qp_do_cleanup+0x4ef/0x810 [rdma_rxe] [+0,000043] ? __pfx_rxe_qp_do_cleanup+0x10/0x10 [rdma_rxe] [+0,000030] execute_in_process_context+0x2b/0x170 [+0,000013] rxe_qp_cleanup+0x1c/0x30 [rdma_rxe] [+0,000021] __rxe_cleanup+0x1cf/0x2e0 [rdma_rxe] [+0,000036] ? __pfx___rxe_cleanup+0x10/0x10 [rdma_rxe] [+0,000020] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [+0,000006] ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 [+0,000012] rxe_destroy_qp+0xe1/0x230 [rdma_rxe] [+0,000035] ib_destroy_qp_user+0x217/0x450 [ib_core] [+0,000074] rdma_destroy_qp+0x83/0x1f0 [rdma_cm] [+0,000034] smbdirect_connection_destroy_qp+0x98/0x2e0 [smbdirect] [+0,000017] ? __pfx_smb_direct_logging_needed+0x10/0x10 [ksmbd] [+0,000044] smbdirect_connection_destroy+0x698/0xed0 [smbdirect] [+0,000023] ? __pfx_smbdirect_connection_destroy+0x10/0x10 [smbdirect] [+0,000033] ? __pfx_smb_direct_logging_needed+0x10/0x10 [ksmbd] [+0,000031] smbdirect_connection_destroy_sync+0x42b/0x9f0 [smbdirect] [+0,000029] ? mark_held_locks+0x46/0x90 [+0,000012] ? __pfx_smbdirect_connection_destroy_sync+0x10/0x10 [smbdirect] [+0,000019] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [+0,000007] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x64/0x70 [+0,000029] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [+0,000010] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [+0,000006] ? __smbdirect_connection_schedule_disconnect+0x339/0x4b0 [+0,000021] smbdirect_sk_destroy+0xb0/0x680 [smbdirect] [+0,000024] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [+0,000006] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x64/0x70 [+0,000006] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [+0,000005] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0xba/0x150 [+0,000011] sk_common_release+0x66/0x340 [+0,000010] smbdirect_sk_close+0x12a/0x790 [smbdirect] [+0,000023] ? ip_mc_drop_socket+0x1e/0x240 [+0,000013] inet_release+0x10a/0x240 [+0,000011] smbdirect_sock_release+0x502/0xe80 [smbdirect] [+0,000015] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [+0,000024] sock_release+0x91/0x1c0 [+0,000010] smb_direct_free_transport+0x31/0x50 [ksmbd] [+0,000025] ksmbd_conn_free+0x1d0/0x240 [ksmbd] [+0,000040] smb_direct_disconnect+0xb2/0x120 [ksmbd] [+0,000023] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [+0,000018] ksmbd_conn_handler_loop+0x94e/0xf10 [ksmbd] ... I'll also add reclassify to the smbdirect socket code [1], but I think it's better to have it in both direction (below and above the RDMA layer). [1] https://git.samba.org/?p=metze/linux/wip.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master-ipproto-smbdirect Cc: Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251127105614.2040922-1-metze@samba.org Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2025
According to the APM Volume #2, Section 15.17, Table 15-10 (24593—Rev. 3.42—March 2024), When "GIF==0", an "Debug exception or trap, due to breakpoint register match" should be "Ignored and discarded". KVM lacks any handling of this. Even when vGIF is enabled and vGIF==0, the CPU does not ignore #DBs and relies on the VMM to do so. Handling this is possible, but the complexity is unjustified given the rarity of using HW breakpoints when GIF==0 (e.g. near VMRUN). KVM would need to intercept the #DB, temporarily disable the breakpoint, singe-step over the instruction (probably reusing NMI singe-stepping), and re-enable the breakpoint. Instead, document this as an erratum. Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev> Reviewed-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251030223757.2950309-1-yosry.ahmed@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2025
Rework the handling of the MMIO Stale Data mitigation to clear CPU buffers immediately prior to VM-Enter, i.e. in the same location that KVM emits a VERW for unconditional (at runtime) clearing. Co-locating the code and using a single ALTERNATIVES_2 makes it more obvious how VMX mitigates the various vulnerabilities. Deliberately order the alternatives as: 0. Do nothing 1. Clear if vCPU can access MMIO 2. Clear always since the last alternative wins in ALTERNATIVES_2(), i.e. so that KVM will honor the strictest mitigation (always clear CPU buffers) if multiple mitigations are selected. E.g. even if the kernel chooses to mitigate MMIO Stale Data via X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF_VM_MMIO, another mitigation may enable X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF_VM, and that other thing needs to win. Note, decoupling the MMIO mitigation from the L1TF mitigation also fixes a mostly-benign flaw where KVM wouldn't do any clearing/flushing if the L1TF mitigation is configured to conditionally flush the L1D, and the MMIO mitigation but not any other "clear CPU buffers" mitigation is enabled. For that specific scenario, KVM would skip clearing CPU buffers for the MMIO mitigation even though the kernel requested a clear on every VM-Enter. Note #2, the flaw goes back to the introduction of the MDS mitigation. The MDS mitigation was inadvertently fixed by commit 43fb862 ("KVM/VMX: Move VERW closer to VMentry for MDS mitigation"), but previous kernels that flush CPU buffers in vmx_vcpu_enter_exit() are affected (though it's unlikely the flaw is meaningfully exploitable even older kernels). Fixes: 650b68a ("x86/kvm/vmx: Add MDS protection when L1D Flush is not active") Suggested-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251113233746.1703361-6-seanjc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2025
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> says: Hi Martin, This patch series includes two bug fixes for this development cycle and six small patches that are intended for the next merge window. If applying the first two patches only during the current development cycle would be inconvenient, postponing all patches until the next merge window is fine with me. Please consider including these patches in the upstream kernel. Thanks, Bart. [mkp: Applied patches #1 and #2 to 6.18/scsi-fixes] Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251014200118.3390839-1-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2025
… 'T'
When perf report with annotation for a symbol, press 's' and 'T', then exit
the annotate browser. Once annotate the same symbol, the annotate browser
will crash.
The browser.arch was required to be correctly updated when data type
feature was enabled by 'T'. Usually it was initialized by symbol__annotate2
function. If a symbol has already been correctly annotated at the first
time, it should not call the symbol__annotate2 function again, thus the
browser.arch will not get initialized. Then at the second time to show the
annotate browser, the data type needs to be displayed but the browser.arch
is empty.
Stack trace as below:
Perf: Segmentation fault
-------- backtrace --------
#0 0x55d365 in ui__signal_backtrace setup.c:0
#1 0x7f5ff1a3e930 in __restore_rt libc.so.6[3e930]
#2 0x570f08 in arch__is perf[570f08]
#3 0x562186 in annotate_get_insn_location perf[562186]
#4 0x562626 in __hist_entry__get_data_type annotate.c:0
#5 0x56476d in annotation_line__write perf[56476d]
#6 0x54e2db in annotate_browser__write annotate.c:0
#7 0x54d061 in ui_browser__list_head_refresh perf[54d061]
#8 0x54dc9e in annotate_browser__refresh annotate.c:0
#9 0x54c03d in __ui_browser__refresh browser.c:0
#10 0x54ccf8 in ui_browser__run perf[54ccf8]
#11 0x54eb92 in __hist_entry__tui_annotate perf[54eb92]
#12 0x552293 in do_annotate hists.c:0
#13 0x55941c in evsel__hists_browse hists.c:0
#14 0x55b00f in evlist__tui_browse_hists perf[55b00f]
#15 0x42ff02 in cmd_report perf[42ff02]
#16 0x494008 in run_builtin perf.c:0
#17 0x494305 in handle_internal_command perf.c:0
#18 0x410547 in main perf[410547]
#19 0x7f5ff1a295d0 in __libc_start_call_main libc.so.6[295d0]
#20 0x7f5ff1a29680 in __libc_start_main@@GLIBC_2.34 libc.so.6[29680]
#21 0x410b75 in _start perf[410b75]
Fixes: 1d4374a ("perf annotate: Add 'T' hot key to toggle data type display")
Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tianyou Li <tianyou.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2025
When using perf record with the `--overwrite` option, a segmentation fault
occurs if an event fails to open. For example:
perf record -e cycles-ct -F 1000 -a --overwrite
Error:
cycles-ct:H: PMU Hardware doesn't support sampling/overflow-interrupts. Try 'perf stat'
perf: Segmentation fault
#0 0x6466b6 in dump_stack debug.c:366
#1 0x646729 in sighandler_dump_stack debug.c:378
#2 0x453fd1 in sigsegv_handler builtin-record.c:722
#3 0x7f8454e65090 in __restore_rt libc-2.32.so[54090]
#4 0x6c5671 in __perf_event__synthesize_id_index synthetic-events.c:1862
#5 0x6c5ac0 in perf_event__synthesize_id_index synthetic-events.c:1943
#6 0x458090 in record__synthesize builtin-record.c:2075
#7 0x45a85a in __cmd_record builtin-record.c:2888
#8 0x45deb6 in cmd_record builtin-record.c:4374
#9 0x4e5e33 in run_builtin perf.c:349
#10 0x4e60bf in handle_internal_command perf.c:401
#11 0x4e6215 in run_argv perf.c:448
#12 0x4e653a in main perf.c:555
#13 0x7f8454e4fa72 in __libc_start_main libc-2.32.so[3ea72]
#14 0x43a3ee in _start ??:0
The --overwrite option implies --tail-synthesize, which collects non-sample
events reflecting the system status when recording finishes. However, when
evsel opening fails (e.g., unsupported event 'cycles-ct'), session->evlist
is not initialized and remains NULL. The code unconditionally calls
record__synthesize() in the error path, which iterates through the NULL
evlist pointer and causes a segfault.
To fix it, move the record__synthesize() call inside the error check block, so
it's only called when there was no error during recording, ensuring that evlist
is properly initialized.
Fixes: 4ea648a ("perf record: Add --tail-synthesize option")
Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2025
When interrupting perf stat in repeat mode with a signal the signal is passed to the child process but the repeat doesn't terminate: ``` $ perf stat -v --null --repeat 10 sleep 1 Control descriptor is not initialized [ perf stat: executing run #1 ... ] [ perf stat: executing run #2 ... ] ^Csleep: Interrupt [ perf stat: executing run #3 ... ] [ perf stat: executing run #4 ... ] [ perf stat: executing run #5 ... ] [ perf stat: executing run #6 ... ] [ perf stat: executing run #7 ... ] [ perf stat: executing run #8 ... ] [ perf stat: executing run #9 ... ] [ perf stat: executing run #10 ... ] Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1' (10 runs): 0.9500 +- 0.0512 seconds time elapsed ( +- 5.39% ) 0.01user 0.02system 0:09.53elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 18940maxresident)k 29944inputs+0outputs (0major+2629minor)pagefaults 0swaps ``` Terminate the repeated run and give a reasonable exit value: ``` $ perf stat -v --null --repeat 10 sleep 1 Control descriptor is not initialized [ perf stat: executing run #1 ... ] [ perf stat: executing run #2 ... ] [ perf stat: executing run #3 ... ] ^Csleep: Interrupt Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1' (10 runs): 0.680 +- 0.321 seconds time elapsed ( +- 47.16% ) Command exited with non-zero status 130 0.00user 0.01system 0:02.05elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 70688maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+5002minor)pagefaults 0swaps ``` Note, this also changes the exit value for non-repeat runs when interrupted by a signal. Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aS5wjmbAM9ka3M2g@gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Tested-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2025
Commit 1d2da79 ("pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Avoid configuring ISEL in gpio_irq_{en,dis}able*()") dropped the configuration of ISEL from struct irq_chip::{irq_enable, irq_disable} APIs and moved it to struct gpio_chip::irq::{child_to_parent_hwirq, child_irq_domain_ops::free} APIs to fix spurious IRQs. After commit 1d2da79 ("pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Avoid configuring ISEL in gpio_irq_{en,dis}able*()"), ISEL was no longer configured properly on resume. This is because the pinctrl resume code used struct irq_chip::irq_enable (called from rzg2l_gpio_irq_restore()) to reconfigure the wakeup interrupts. Some drivers (e.g. Ethernet) may also reconfigure non-wakeup interrupts on resume through their own code, eventually calling struct irq_chip::irq_enable. Fix this by adding ISEL configuration back into the struct irq_chip::irq_enable API and on resume path for wakeup interrupts. As struct irq_chip::irq_enable needs now to lock to update the ISEL, convert the struct rzg2l_pinctrl::lock to a raw spinlock and replace the locking API calls with the raw variants. Otherwise the lockdep reports invalid wait context when probing the adv7511 module on RZ/G2L: [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.17.0-rc5-next-20250911-00001-gfcfac22533c9 #18 Not tainted ----------------------------- (udev-worker)/165 is trying to lock: ffff00000e3664a8 (&pctrl->lock){....}-{3:3}, at: rzg2l_gpio_irq_enable+0x38/0x78 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 3 locks held by (udev-worker)/165: #0: ffff00000e890108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __driver_attach+0x90/0x1ac #1: ffff000011c07240 (request_class){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq+0xb4/0x6dc #2: ffff000011c070c8 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: __setup_irq+0xdc/0x6dc stack backtrace: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 165 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.17.0-rc5-next-20250911-00001-gfcfac22533c9 #18 PREEMPT Hardware name: Renesas SMARC EVK based on r9a07g044l2 (DT) Call trace: show_stack+0x18/0x24 (C) dump_stack_lvl+0x90/0xd0 dump_stack+0x18/0x24 __lock_acquire+0xa14/0x20b4 lock_acquire+0x1c8/0x354 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x60/0x88 rzg2l_gpio_irq_enable+0x38/0x78 irq_enable+0x40/0x8c __irq_startup+0x78/0xa4 irq_startup+0x108/0x16c __setup_irq+0x3c0/0x6dc request_threaded_irq+0xec/0x1ac devm_request_threaded_irq+0x80/0x134 adv7511_probe+0x928/0x9a4 [adv7511] i2c_device_probe+0x22c/0x3dc really_probe+0xbc/0x2a0 __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x12c driver_probe_device+0x40/0x164 __driver_attach+0x9c/0x1ac bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xd0 driver_attach+0x24/0x30 bus_add_driver+0xe4/0x208 driver_register+0x60/0x128 i2c_register_driver+0x48/0xd0 adv7511_init+0x5c/0x1000 [adv7511] do_one_initcall+0x64/0x30c do_init_module+0x58/0x23c load_module+0x1bcc/0x1d40 init_module_from_file+0x88/0xc4 idempotent_init_module+0x188/0x27c __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x68/0xac invoke_syscall+0x48/0x110 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc0/0xe0 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 el0_svc+0x4c/0x160 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xa0/0xe4 el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c Having ISEL configuration back into the struct irq_chip::irq_enable API should be safe with respect to spurious IRQs, as in the probe case IRQs are enabled anyway in struct gpio_chip::irq::child_to_parent_hwirq. No spurious IRQs were detected on suspend/resume, boot, ethernet link insert/remove tests (executed on RZ/G3S). Boot, ethernet link insert/remove tests were also executed successfully on RZ/G2L. Fixes: 1d2da79 ("pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Avoid configuring ISEL in gpio_irq_{en,dis}able*(") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250912095308.3603704-1-claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2025
The pic64gx has a second pinmux "downstream" of the iomux0 pinmux. The documentation for the SoC provides no name for this device, but it is used to swap pins between either GPIO controller #2 or select other functions, hence the "gpio2" name. Currently there is no documentation about what each bit actually does that is publicly available, nor (I believe) what pins are affected. That info is as follows: pin role (1/0) --- ---------- E14 MAC_0_MDC/GPIO_2_0 E15 MAC_0_MDIO/GPIO_2_1 F16 MAC_1_MDC/GPIO_2_2 F17 MAC_1_MDIO/GPIO_2_3 D19 SPI_0_CLK/GPIO_2_4 B18 SPI_0_SS0/GPIO_2_5 B10 CAN_0_RXBUS/GPIO_2_6 C14 PCIE_PERST_2#/GPIO_2_7 E18 PCIE_WAKE#/GPIO_2_8 D18 PCIE_PERST_1#/GPIO_2_9 E19 SPI_0_DO/GPIO_2_10 C7 SPI_0_DI/GPIO_2_11 D6 QSPI_SS0/GPIO_2_12 D7 QSPI_CLK (B)/GPIO_2_13 C9 QSPI_DATA0/GPIO_2_14 C10 QSPI_DATA1/GPIO_2_15 A5 QSPI_DATA2/GPIO_2_16 A6 QSPI_DATA3/GPIO_2_17 D8 MMUART_3_RXD/GPIO_2_18 D9 MMUART_3_TXD/GPIO_2_19 B8 MMUART_4_RXD/GPIO_2_20 A8 MMUART_4_TXD/GPIO_2_21 C12 CAN_1_TXBUS/GPIO_2_22 B12 CAN_1_RXBUS/GPIO_2_23 A11 CAN_0_TX_EBL_N/GPIO_2_24 A10 CAN_1_TX_EBL_N/GPIO_2_25 D11 MMUART_2_RXD/GPIO_2_26 C11 MMUART_2_TXD/GPIO_2_27 B9 CAN_0_TXBUS/GPIO_2_28 Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2025
The pic64gx has a second pinmux "downstream" of the iomux0 pinmux. The documentation for the SoC provides no name for this device, but it is used to swap pins between either GPIO controller #2 or select other functions, hence the "gpio2" name. Add a driver for it. Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2025
As Jiaming Zhang and syzbot reported, there is potential deadlock in
f2fs as below:
Chain exists of:
&sbi->cp_rwsem --> fs_reclaim --> sb_internal#2
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
rlock(sb_internal#2);
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(sb_internal#2);
rlock(&sbi->cp_rwsem);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by kswapd0/73:
#0: ffffffff8e247a40 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:7015 [inline]
#0: ffffffff8e247a40 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0x951/0x2800 mm/vmscan.c:7389
#1: ffff8880118400e0 (&type->s_umount_key#50){.+.+}-{4:4}, at: super_trylock_shared fs/super.c:562 [inline]
#1: ffff8880118400e0 (&type->s_umount_key#50){.+.+}-{4:4}, at: super_cache_scan+0x91/0x4b0 fs/super.c:197
#2: ffff888011840610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: f2fs_evict_inode+0x8d9/0x1b60 fs/f2fs/inode.c:890
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 73 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full)
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x189/0x250 lib/dump_stack.c:120
print_circular_bug+0x2ee/0x310 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2043
check_noncircular+0x134/0x160 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3165 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline]
validate_chain+0xb9b/0x2140 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908
__lock_acquire+0xab9/0xd20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237
lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
down_read+0x46/0x2e0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1537
f2fs_down_read fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2278 [inline]
f2fs_lock_op fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2357 [inline]
f2fs_do_truncate_blocks+0x21c/0x10c0 fs/f2fs/file.c:791
f2fs_truncate_blocks+0x10a/0x300 fs/f2fs/file.c:867
f2fs_truncate+0x489/0x7c0 fs/f2fs/file.c:925
f2fs_evict_inode+0x9f2/0x1b60 fs/f2fs/inode.c:897
evict+0x504/0x9c0 fs/inode.c:810
f2fs_evict_inode+0x1dc/0x1b60 fs/f2fs/inode.c:853
evict+0x504/0x9c0 fs/inode.c:810
dispose_list fs/inode.c:852 [inline]
prune_icache_sb+0x21b/0x2c0 fs/inode.c:1000
super_cache_scan+0x39b/0x4b0 fs/super.c:224
do_shrink_slab+0x6ef/0x1110 mm/shrinker.c:437
shrink_slab_memcg mm/shrinker.c:550 [inline]
shrink_slab+0x7ef/0x10d0 mm/shrinker.c:628
shrink_one+0x28a/0x7c0 mm/vmscan.c:4955
shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:5016 [inline]
lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:5094 [inline]
shrink_node+0x315d/0x3780 mm/vmscan.c:6081
kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6941 [inline]
balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:7124 [inline]
kswapd+0x147c/0x2800 mm/vmscan.c:7389
kthread+0x70e/0x8a0 kernel/kthread.c:463
ret_from_fork+0x4bc/0x870 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
</TASK>
The root cause is deadlock among four locks as below:
kswapd
- fs_reclaim --- Lock A
- shrink_one
- evict
- f2fs_evict_inode
- sb_start_intwrite --- Lock B
- iput
- evict
- f2fs_evict_inode
- sb_start_intwrite --- Lock B
- f2fs_truncate
- f2fs_truncate_blocks
- f2fs_do_truncate_blocks
- f2fs_lock_op --- Lock C
ioctl
- f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write
- f2fs_lock_op --- Lock C
- __f2fs_commit_atomic_write
- __replace_atomic_write_block
- f2fs_get_dnode_of_data
- __get_node_folio
- f2fs_check_nid_range
- f2fs_handle_error
- f2fs_record_errors
- f2fs_down_write --- Lock D
open
- do_open
- do_truncate
- security_inode_need_killpriv
- f2fs_getxattr
- lookup_all_xattrs
- f2fs_handle_error
- f2fs_record_errors
- f2fs_down_write --- Lock D
- f2fs_commit_super
- read_mapping_folio
- filemap_alloc_folio_noprof
- prepare_alloc_pages
- fs_reclaim_acquire --- Lock A
In order to avoid such deadlock, we need to avoid grabbing sb_lock in
f2fs_handle_error(), so, let's use asynchronous method instead:
- remove f2fs_handle_error() implementation
- rename f2fs_handle_error_async() to f2fs_handle_error()
- spread f2fs_handle_error()
Fixes: 95fa90c ("f2fs: support recording errors into superblock")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reported-by: syzbot+14b90e1156b9f6fc1266@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/68eae49b.050a0220.ac43.0001.GAE@google.com
Reported-by: Jiaming Zhang <r772577952@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CANypQFa-Gy9sD-N35o3PC+FystOWkNuN8pv6S75HLT0ga-Tzgw@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2025
Jakub reported an MPTCP deadlock at fallback time: WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.18.0-rc7-virtme #1 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- mptcp_connect/20858 is trying to acquire lock: ff1100001da18b60 (&msk->fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_try_fallback+0xd8/0x280 but task is already holding lock: ff1100001da18b60 (&msk->fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x352/0xaa0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&msk->fallback_lock); lock(&msk->fallback_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 3 locks held by mptcp_connect/20858: #0: ff1100001da18290 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x114/0x1bc0 #1: ff1100001db40fd0 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x2cb/0xaa0 #2: ff1100001da18b60 (&msk->fallback_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __mptcp_retrans+0x352/0xaa0 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 20858 Comm: mptcp_connect Not tainted 6.18.0-rc7-virtme #1 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x6f/0xa0 print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xcd validate_chain+0x2ff/0x5f0 __lock_acquire+0x34c/0x740 lock_acquire.part.0+0xbc/0x260 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x38/0x50 __mptcp_try_fallback+0xd8/0x280 mptcp_sendmsg_frag+0x16c2/0x3050 __mptcp_retrans+0x421/0xaa0 mptcp_release_cb+0x5aa/0xa70 release_sock+0xab/0x1d0 mptcp_sendmsg+0xd5b/0x1bc0 sock_write_iter+0x281/0x4d0 new_sync_write+0x3c5/0x6f0 vfs_write+0x65e/0xbb0 ksys_write+0x17e/0x200 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0xfd0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7fa5627cbc5e Code: 4d 89 d8 e8 14 bd 00 00 4c 8b 5d f8 41 8b 93 08 03 00 00 59 5e 48 83 f8 fc 74 11 c9 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 8b 45 10 0f 05 <c9> c3 83 e2 39 83 fa 08 75 e7 e8 13 ff ff ff 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa RSP: 002b:00007fff1fe14700 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000005 RCX: 00007fa5627cbc5e RDX: 0000000000001f9c RSI: 00007fff1fe16984 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 00007fff1fe14710 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007fff1fe16920 R13: 0000000000002000 R14: 0000000000001f9c R15: 0000000000001f9c The packet scheduler could attempt a reinjection after receiving an MP_FAIL and before the infinite map has been transmitted, causing a deadlock since MPTCP needs to do the reinjection atomically from WRT fallback. Address the issue explicitly avoiding the reinjection in the critical scenario. Note that this is the only fallback critical section that could potentially send packets and hit the double-lock. Reported-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Closes: https://netdev-ctrl.bots.linux.dev/logs/vmksft/mptcp-dbg/results/412720/1-mptcp-join-sh/stderr Fixes: f8a1d9b ("mptcp: make fallback action and fallback decision atomic") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251205-net-mptcp-misc-fixes-6-19-rc1-v1-4-9e4781a6c1b8@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2025
The IPv4 code path in __ip_vs_get_out_rt() calls dst_link_failure() without ensuring skb->dev is set, leading to a NULL pointer dereference in fib_compute_spec_dst() when ipv4_link_failure() attempts to send ICMP destination unreachable messages. The issue emerged after commit ed0de45 ("ipv4: recompile ip options in ipv4_link_failure") started calling __ip_options_compile() from ipv4_link_failure(). This code path eventually calls fib_compute_spec_dst() which dereferences skb->dev. An attempt was made to fix the NULL skb->dev dereference in commit 0113d9c ("ipv4: fix null-deref in ipv4_link_failure"), but it only addressed the immediate dev_net(skb->dev) dereference by using a fallback device. The fix was incomplete because fib_compute_spec_dst() later in the call chain still accesses skb->dev directly, which remains NULL when IPVS calls dst_link_failure(). The crash occurs when: 1. IPVS processes a packet in NAT mode with a misconfigured destination 2. Route lookup fails in __ip_vs_get_out_rt() before establishing a route 3. The error path calls dst_link_failure(skb) with skb->dev == NULL 4. ipv4_link_failure() → ipv4_send_dest_unreach() → __ip_options_compile() → fib_compute_spec_dst() 5. fib_compute_spec_dst() dereferences NULL skb->dev Apply the same fix used for IPv6 in commit 326bf17 ("ipvs: fix ipv6 route unreach panic"): set skb->dev from skb_dst(skb)->dev before calling dst_link_failure(). KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000328-0x000000000000032f] CPU: 1 PID: 12732 Comm: syz.1.3469 Not tainted 6.6.114 #2 RIP: 0010:__in_dev_get_rcu include/linux/inetdevice.h:233 RIP: 0010:fib_compute_spec_dst+0x17a/0x9f0 net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c:285 Call Trace: <TASK> spec_dst_fill net/ipv4/ip_options.c:232 spec_dst_fill net/ipv4/ip_options.c:229 __ip_options_compile+0x13a1/0x17d0 net/ipv4/ip_options.c:330 ipv4_send_dest_unreach net/ipv4/route.c:1252 ipv4_link_failure+0x702/0xb80 net/ipv4/route.c:1265 dst_link_failure include/net/dst.h:437 __ip_vs_get_out_rt+0x15fd/0x19e0 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c:412 ip_vs_nat_xmit+0x1d8/0xc80 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_xmit.c:764 Fixes: ed0de45 ("ipv4: recompile ip options in ipv4_link_failure") Signed-off-by: Slavin Liu <slavin452@gmail.com> Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2025
Petr Machata says: ==================== selftests: forwarding: vxlan_bridge_1q_mc_ul: Fix flakiness The net/forwarding/vxlan_bridge_1q_mc_ul selftest runs an overlay traffic, forwarded over a multicast-routed VXLAN underlay. In order to determine whether packets reach their intended destination, it uses a TC match. For convenience, it uses a flower match, which however does not allow matching on the encapsulated packet. So various service traffic ends up being indistinguishable from the test packets, and ends up confusing the test. To alleviate the problem, the test uses sleep to allow the necessary service traffic to run and clear the channel, before running the test traffic. This worked for a while, but lately we have nevertheless seen flakiness of the test in the CI. In this patchset, first generalize tc_rule_stats_get() to support u32 in patch #1, then in patch #2 convert the test to use u32 to allow parsing deeper into the packet, and in #3 drop the now-unnecessary sleep. ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/cover.1765289566.git.petrm@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2025
Fix a loop scenario of ethx:egress->ethx:egress
Example setup to reproduce:
tc qdisc add dev ethx root handle 1: drr
tc filter add dev ethx parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 matchall \
action mirred egress redirect dev ethx
Now ping out of ethx and you get a deadlock:
[ 116.892898][ T307] ============================================
[ 116.893182][ T307] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 116.893418][ T307] 6.18.0-rc6-01205-ge05021a829b8-dirty #204 Not tainted
[ 116.893682][ T307] --------------------------------------------
[ 116.893926][ T307] ping/307 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 116.894133][ T307] ffff88800c122908 (&sch->root_lock_key){+...}-{3:3}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x2210/0x3b50
[ 116.894517][ T307]
[ 116.894517][ T307] but task is already holding lock:
[ 116.894836][ T307] ffff88800c122908 (&sch->root_lock_key){+...}-{3:3}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x2210/0x3b50
[ 116.895252][ T307]
[ 116.895252][ T307] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 116.895608][ T307] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 116.895608][ T307]
[ 116.895901][ T307] CPU0
[ 116.896057][ T307] ----
[ 116.896200][ T307] lock(&sch->root_lock_key);
[ 116.896392][ T307] lock(&sch->root_lock_key);
[ 116.896605][ T307]
[ 116.896605][ T307] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 116.896605][ T307]
[ 116.896864][ T307] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 116.896864][ T307]
[ 116.897123][ T307] 6 locks held by ping/307:
[ 116.897302][ T307] #0: ffff88800b4b0250 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: raw_sendmsg+0xb20/0x2cf0
[ 116.897808][ T307] #1: ffffffff88c839c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: ip_output+0xa9/0x600
[ 116.898138][ T307] #2: ffffffff88c839c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x2c6/0x1ee0
[ 116.898459][ T307] #3: ffffffff88c83960 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:3}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x200/0x3b50
[ 116.898782][ T307] #4: ffff88800c122908 (&sch->root_lock_key){+...}-{3:3}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x2210/0x3b50
[ 116.899132][ T307] #5: ffffffff88c83960 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:3}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x200/0x3b50
[ 116.899442][ T307]
[ 116.899442][ T307] stack backtrace:
[ 116.899667][ T307] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 307 Comm: ping Not tainted 6.18.0-rc6-01205-ge05021a829b8-dirty #204 PREEMPT(voluntary)
[ 116.899672][ T307] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
[ 116.899675][ T307] Call Trace:
[ 116.899678][ T307] <TASK>
[ 116.899680][ T307] dump_stack_lvl+0x6f/0xb0
[ 116.899688][ T307] print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xdc
[ 116.899695][ T307] __lock_acquire+0x11f7/0x1be0
[ 116.899704][ T307] lock_acquire+0x162/0x300
[ 116.899707][ T307] ? __dev_queue_xmit+0x2210/0x3b50
[ 116.899713][ T307] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 116.899717][ T307] ? stack_trace_save+0x93/0xd0
[ 116.899723][ T307] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40
[ 116.899728][ T307] ? __dev_queue_xmit+0x2210/0x3b50
[ 116.899731][ T307] __dev_queue_xmit+0x2210/0x3b50
Fixes: 178ca30 ("Revert "net/sched: Fix mirred deadlock on device recursion"")
Tested-by: Victor Nogueira <victor@mojatatu.com>
Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251210162255.1057663-1-jhs@mojatatu.com
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 27, 2025
A race condition was found in sg_proc_debug_helper(). It was observed on a system using an IBM LTO-9 SAS Tape Drive (ULTRIUM-TD9) and monitoring /proc/scsi/sg/debug every second. A very large elapsed time would sometimes appear. This is caused by two race conditions. We reproduced the issue with an IBM ULTRIUM-HH9 tape drive on an x86_64 architecture. A patched kernel was built, and the race condition could not be observed anymore after the application of this patch. A reproducer C program utilising the scsi_debug module was also built by Changhui Zhong and can be viewed here: https://github.com/MichaelRabek/linux-tests/blob/master/drivers/scsi/sg/sg_race_trigger.c The first race happens between the reading of hp->duration in sg_proc_debug_helper() and request completion in sg_rq_end_io(). The hp->duration member variable may hold either of two types of information: #1 - The start time of the request. This value is present while the request is not yet finished. #2 - The total execution time of the request (end_time - start_time). If sg_proc_debug_helper() executes *after* the value of hp->duration was changed from #1 to #2, but *before* srp->done is set to 1 in sg_rq_end_io(), a fresh timestamp is taken in the else branch, and the elapsed time (value type #2) is subtracted from a timestamp, which cannot yield a valid elapsed time (which is a type #2 value as well). To fix this issue, the value of hp->duration must change under the protection of the sfp->rq_list_lock in sg_rq_end_io(). Since sg_proc_debug_helper() takes this read lock, the change to srp->done and srp->header.duration will happen atomically from the perspective of sg_proc_debug_helper() and the race condition is thus eliminated. The second race condition happens between sg_proc_debug_helper() and sg_new_write(). Even though hp->duration is set to the current time stamp in sg_add_request() under the write lock's protection, it gets overwritten by a call to get_sg_io_hdr(), which calls copy_from_user() to copy struct sg_io_hdr from userspace into kernel space. hp->duration is set to the start time again in sg_common_write(). If sg_proc_debug_helper() is called between these two calls, an arbitrary value set by userspace (usually zero) is used to compute the elapsed time. To fix this issue, hp->duration must be set to the current timestamp again after get_sg_io_hdr() returns successfully. A small race window still exists between get_sg_io_hdr() and setting hp->duration, but this window is only a few instructions wide and does not result in observable issues in practice, as confirmed by testing. Additionally, we fix the format specifier from %d to %u for printing unsigned int values in sg_proc_debug_helper(). Signed-off-by: Michal Rábek <mrabek@redhat.com> Suggested-by: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com> Tested-by: Changhui Zhong <czhong@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: John Meneghini <jmeneghi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251212160900.64924-1-mrabek@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 29, 2025
When a page is freed it coalesces with a buddy into a higher order page while possible. When the buddy page migrate type differs, it is expected to be updated to match the one of the page being freed. However, only the first pageblock of the buddy page is updated, while the rest of the pageblocks are left unchanged. That causes warnings in later expand() and other code paths (like below), since an inconsistency between migration type of the list containing the page and the page-owned pageblocks migration types is introduced. [ 308.986589] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 308.987227] page type is 0, passed migratetype is 1 (nr=256) [ 308.987275] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5224 at mm/page_alloc.c:812 expand+0x23c/0x270 [ 308.987293] Modules linked in: algif_hash(E) af_alg(E) nft_fib_inet(E) nft_fib_ipv4(E) nft_fib_ipv6(E) nft_fib(E) nft_reject_inet(E) nf_reject_ipv4(E) nf_reject_ipv6(E) nft_reject(E) nft_ct(E) nft_chain_nat(E) nf_nat(E) nf_conntrack(E) nf_defrag_ipv6(E) nf_defrag_ipv4(E) nf_tables(E) s390_trng(E) vfio_ccw(E) mdev(E) vfio_iommu_type1(E) vfio(E) sch_fq_codel(E) drm(E) i2c_core(E) drm_panel_orientation_quirks(E) loop(E) nfnetlink(E) vsock_loopback(E) vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common(E) vsock(E) ctcm(E) fsm(E) diag288_wdt(E) watchdog(E) zfcp(E) scsi_transport_fc(E) ghash_s390(E) prng(E) aes_s390(E) des_generic(E) des_s390(E) libdes(E) sha3_512_s390(E) sha3_256_s390(E) sha_common(E) paes_s390(E) crypto_engine(E) pkey_cca(E) pkey_ep11(E) zcrypt(E) rng_core(E) pkey_pckmo(E) pkey(E) autofs4(E) [ 308.987439] Unloaded tainted modules: hmac_s390(E):2 [ 308.987650] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 5224 Comm: mempig_verify Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 6.18.0-gcc-bpf-debug #431 PREEMPT [ 308.987657] Tainted: [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE [ 308.987661] Hardware name: IBM 3906 M04 704 (z/VM 7.3.0) [ 308.987666] Krnl PSW : 0404f00180000000 00000349976fa600 (expand+0x240/0x270) [ 308.987676] R:0 T:1 IO:0 EX:0 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:3 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3 [ 308.987682] Krnl GPRS: 0000034980000004 0000000000000005 0000000000000030 000003499a0e6d88 [ 308.987688] 0000000000000005 0000034980000005 000002be803ac000 0000023efe6c8300 [ 308.987692] 0000000000000008 0000034998d57290 000002be00000100 0000023e00000008 [ 308.987696] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000349976fa5fc 000002c99b1eb6f0 [ 308.987708] Krnl Code: 00000349976fa5f0: c020008a02f2 larl %r2,000003499883abd4 00000349976fa5f6: c0e5ffe3f4b5 brasl %r14,0000034997378f60 #00000349976fa5fc: af000000 mc 0,0 >00000349976fa600: a7f4ff4c brc 15,00000349976fa498 00000349976fa604: b9040026 lgr %r2,%r6 00000349976fa608: c0300088317f larl %r3,0000034998800906 00000349976fa60e: c0e5fffdb6e1 brasl %r14,00000349976b13d0 00000349976fa614: af000000 mc 0,0 [ 308.987734] Call Trace: [ 308.987738] [<00000349976fa600>] expand+0x240/0x270 [ 308.987744] ([<00000349976fa5fc>] expand+0x23c/0x270) [ 308.987749] [<00000349976ff95e>] rmqueue_bulk+0x71e/0x940 [ 308.987754] [<00000349976ffd7e>] __rmqueue_pcplist+0x1fe/0x2a0 [ 308.987759] [<0000034997700966>] rmqueue.isra.0+0xb46/0xf40 [ 308.987763] [<0000034997703ec8>] get_page_from_freelist+0x198/0x8d0 [ 308.987768] [<0000034997706fa8>] __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof+0x198/0x400 [ 308.987774] [<00000349977536f8>] alloc_pages_mpol+0xb8/0x220 [ 308.987781] [<0000034997753bf6>] folio_alloc_mpol_noprof+0x26/0xc0 [ 308.987786] [<0000034997753e4c>] vma_alloc_folio_noprof+0x6c/0xa0 [ 308.987791] [<0000034997775b22>] vma_alloc_anon_folio_pmd+0x42/0x240 [ 308.987799] [<000003499777bfea>] __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page+0x3a/0x210 [ 308.987804] [<00000349976cb08e>] __handle_mm_fault+0x4de/0x500 [ 308.987809] [<00000349976cb14c>] handle_mm_fault+0x9c/0x3a0 [ 308.987813] [<000003499734d70e>] do_exception+0x1de/0x540 [ 308.987822] [<0000034998387390>] __do_pgm_check+0x130/0x220 [ 308.987830] [<000003499839a934>] pgm_check_handler+0x114/0x160 [ 308.987838] 3 locks held by mempig_verify/5224: [ 308.987842] #0: 0000023ea44c1e08 (vm_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: lock_vma_under_rcu+0xb2/0x2a0 [ 308.987859] #1: 0000023ee4d41b18 (&pcp->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: rmqueue.isra.0+0xad6/0xf40 [ 308.987871] #2: 0000023efe6c8998 (&zone->lock){..-.}-{2:2}, at: rmqueue_bulk+0x5a/0x940 [ 308.987886] Last Breaking-Event-Address: [ 308.987890] [<0000034997379096>] __warn_printk+0x136/0x140 [ 308.987897] irq event stamp: 52330356 [ 308.987901] hardirqs last enabled at (52330355): [<000003499838742e>] __do_pgm_check+0x1ce/0x220 [ 308.987907] hardirqs last disabled at (52330356): [<000003499839932e>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x9e/0xe0 [ 308.987913] softirqs last enabled at (52329882): [<0000034997383786>] handle_softirqs+0x2c6/0x530 [ 308.987922] softirqs last disabled at (52329859): [<0000034997382f86>] __irq_exit_rcu+0x126/0x140 [ 308.987929] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 308.987936] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 308.987940] page type is 0, passed migratetype is 1 (nr=256) [ 308.987951] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5224 at mm/page_alloc.c:860 __del_page_from_free_list+0x1be/0x1e0 [ 308.987960] Modules linked in: algif_hash(E) af_alg(E) nft_fib_inet(E) nft_fib_ipv4(E) nft_fib_ipv6(E) nft_fib(E) nft_reject_inet(E) nf_reject_ipv4(E) nf_reject_ipv6(E) nft_reject(E) nft_ct(E) nft_chain_nat(E) nf_nat(E) nf_conntrack(E) nf_defrag_ipv6(E) nf_defrag_ipv4(E) nf_tables(E) s390_trng(E) vfio_ccw(E) mdev(E) vfio_iommu_type1(E) vfio(E) sch_fq_codel(E) drm(E) i2c_core(E) drm_panel_orientation_quirks(E) loop(E) nfnetlink(E) vsock_loopback(E) vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common(E) vsock(E) ctcm(E) fsm(E) diag288_wdt(E) watchdog(E) zfcp(E) scsi_transport_fc(E) ghash_s390(E) prng(E) aes_s390(E) des_generic(E) des_s390(E) libdes(E) sha3_512_s390(E) sha3_256_s390(E) sha_common(E) paes_s390(E) crypto_engine(E) pkey_cca(E) pkey_ep11(E) zcrypt(E) rng_core(E) pkey_pckmo(E) pkey(E) autofs4(E) [ 308.988070] Unloaded tainted modules: hmac_s390(E):2 [ 308.988087] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 5224 Comm: mempig_verify Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W E 6.18.0-gcc-bpf-debug #431 PREEMPT [ 308.988095] Tainted: [W]=WARN, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE [ 308.988100] Hardware name: IBM 3906 M04 704 (z/VM 7.3.0) [ 308.988105] Krnl PSW : 0404f00180000000 00000349976f9e32 (__del_page_from_free_list+0x1c2/0x1e0) [ 308.988118] R:0 T:1 IO:0 EX:0 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:3 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3 [ 308.988127] Krnl GPRS: 0000034980000004 0000000000000005 0000000000000030 000003499a0e6d88 [ 308.988133] 0000000000000005 0000034980000005 0000034998d57290 0000023efe6c8300 [ 308.988139] 0000000000000001 0000000000000008 000002be00000100 000002be803ac000 [ 308.988144] 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 00000349976f9e2e 000002c99b1eb728 [ 308.988153] Krnl Code: 00000349976f9e22: c020008a06d9 larl %r2,000003499883abd4 00000349976f9e28: c0e5ffe3f89c brasl %r14,0000034997378f60 #00000349976f9e2e: af000000 mc 0,0 >00000349976f9e32: a7f4ff4e brc 15,00000349976f9cce 00000349976f9e36: b904002b lgr %r2,%r11 00000349976f9e3a: c030008a06e7 larl %r3,000003499883ac08 00000349976f9e40: c0e5fffdbac8 brasl %r14,00000349976b13d0 00000349976f9e46: af000000 mc 0,0 [ 308.988184] Call Trace: [ 308.988188] [<00000349976f9e32>] __del_page_from_free_list+0x1c2/0x1e0 [ 308.988195] ([<00000349976f9e2e>] __del_page_from_free_list+0x1be/0x1e0) [ 308.988202] [<00000349976ff946>] rmqueue_bulk+0x706/0x940 [ 308.988208] [<00000349976ffd7e>] __rmqueue_pcplist+0x1fe/0x2a0 [ 308.988214] [<0000034997700966>] rmqueue.isra.0+0xb46/0xf40 [ 308.988221] [<0000034997703ec8>] get_page_from_freelist+0x198/0x8d0 [ 308.988227] [<0000034997706fa8>] __alloc_frozen_pages_noprof+0x198/0x400 [ 308.988233] [<00000349977536f8>] alloc_pages_mpol+0xb8/0x220 [ 308.988240] [<0000034997753bf6>] folio_alloc_mpol_noprof+0x26/0xc0 [ 308.988247] [<0000034997753e4c>] vma_alloc_folio_noprof+0x6c/0xa0 [ 308.988253] [<0000034997775b22>] vma_alloc_anon_folio_pmd+0x42/0x240 [ 308.988260] [<000003499777bfea>] __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page+0x3a/0x210 [ 308.988267] [<00000349976cb08e>] __handle_mm_fault+0x4de/0x500 [ 308.988273] [<00000349976cb14c>] handle_mm_fault+0x9c/0x3a0 [ 308.988279] [<000003499734d70e>] do_exception+0x1de/0x540 [ 308.988286] [<0000034998387390>] __do_pgm_check+0x130/0x220 [ 308.988293] [<000003499839a934>] pgm_check_handler+0x114/0x160 [ 308.988300] 3 locks held by mempig_verify/5224: [ 308.988305] #0: 0000023ea44c1e08 (vm_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: lock_vma_under_rcu+0xb2/0x2a0 [ 308.988322] #1: 0000023ee4d41b18 (&pcp->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: rmqueue.isra.0+0xad6/0xf40 [ 308.988334] #2: 0000023efe6c8998 (&zone->lock){..-.}-{2:2}, at: rmqueue_bulk+0x5a/0x940 [ 308.988346] Last Breaking-Event-Address: [ 308.988350] [<0000034997379096>] __warn_printk+0x136/0x140 [ 308.988356] irq event stamp: 52330356 [ 308.988360] hardirqs last enabled at (52330355): [<000003499838742e>] __do_pgm_check+0x1ce/0x220 [ 308.988366] hardirqs last disabled at (52330356): [<000003499839932e>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x9e/0xe0 [ 308.988373] softirqs last enabled at (52329882): [<0000034997383786>] handle_softirqs+0x2c6/0x530 [ 308.988380] softirqs last disabled at (52329859): [<0000034997382f86>] __irq_exit_rcu+0x126/0x140 [ 308.988388] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251215081002.3353900A9c-agordeev@linux.ibm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251212151457.3898073Add-agordeev@linux.ibm.com Fixes: e6cf9e1 ("mm: page_alloc: fix up block types when merging compatible blocks") Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com> Reported-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/87wmalyktd.fsf@linux.ibm.com/ Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 29, 2025
When running the Rust maple tree kunit tests with lockdep, you may trigger a warning that looks like this: lib/maple_tree.c:780 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 no locks held by kunit_try_catch/344. stack backtrace: CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 344 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G N 6.19.0-rc1+ #2 NONE Tainted: [N]=TEST Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.17.0-0-gb52ca86e094d-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x71/0x90 lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x150/0x190 mas_start+0x104/0x150 mas_find+0x179/0x240 _RINvNtCs5QSdWC790r4_4core3ptr13drop_in_placeINtNtCs1cdwasc6FUb_6kernel10maple_tree9MapleTreeINtNtNtBL_5alloc4kbox3BoxlNtNtB1x_9allocator7KmallocEEECsgxAQYCfdR72_25doctests_kernel_generated+0xaf/0x130 rust_doctest_kernel_maple_tree_rs_0+0x600/0x6b0 ? lock_release+0xeb/0x2a0 ? kunit_try_catch_run+0x210/0x210 kunit_try_run_case+0x74/0x160 ? kunit_try_catch_run+0x210/0x210 kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x12/0x30 kthread+0x21c/0x230 ? __do_trace_sched_kthread_stop_ret+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x16c/0x270 ? __do_trace_sched_kthread_stop_ret+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 </TASK> This is because the destructor of maple tree calls mas_find() without taking rcu_read_lock() or the spinlock. Doing that is actually ok in this case since the destructor has exclusive access to the entire maple tree, but it triggers a lockdep warning. To fix that, take the rcu read lock. In the future, it's possible that memory reclaim could gain a feature where it reallocates entries in maple trees even if no user-code is touching it. If that feature is added, then this use of rcu read lock would become load-bearing, so I did not make it conditional on lockdep. We have to repeatedly take and release rcu because the destructor of T might perform operations that sleep. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251217-maple-drop-rcu-v1-1-702af063573f@google.com Fixes: da939ef ("rust: maple_tree: add MapleTree") Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Reported-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org> Closes: https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/x/topic/x/near/564215108 Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@collabora.com> Cc: Andrew Ballance <andrewjballance@gmail.com> Cc: Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Cc: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> Cc: Trevor Gross <tmgross@umich.edu> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 30, 2025
… to macb_open() In the non-RT kernel, local_bh_disable() merely disables preemption, whereas it maps to an actual spin lock in the RT kernel. Consequently, when attempting to refill RX buffers via netdev_alloc_skb() in macb_mac_link_up(), a deadlock scenario arises as follows: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.18.0-08691-g2061f18ad76e #39 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/0:0/8 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00080369bbe0 (&bp->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: macb_start_xmit+0x808/0xb7c but task is already holding lock: ffff000803698e58 (&queue->tx_ptr_lock){+...}-{3:3}, at: macb_start_xmit +0x148/0xb7c which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&queue->tx_ptr_lock){+...}-{3:3}: rt_spin_lock+0x50/0x1f0 macb_start_xmit+0x148/0xb7c dev_hard_start_xmit+0x94/0x284 sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x37c __dev_queue_xmit+0x708/0x1120 neigh_resolve_output+0x148/0x28c ip6_finish_output2+0x2c0/0xb2c __ip6_finish_output+0x114/0x308 ip6_output+0xc4/0x4a4 mld_sendpack+0x220/0x68c mld_ifc_work+0x2a8/0x4f4 process_one_work+0x20c/0x5f8 worker_thread+0x1b0/0x35c kthread+0x144/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #2 (_xmit_ETHER#2){+...}-{3:3}: rt_spin_lock+0x50/0x1f0 sch_direct_xmit+0x11c/0x37c __dev_queue_xmit+0x708/0x1120 neigh_resolve_output+0x148/0x28c ip6_finish_output2+0x2c0/0xb2c __ip6_finish_output+0x114/0x308 ip6_output+0xc4/0x4a4 mld_sendpack+0x220/0x68c mld_ifc_work+0x2a8/0x4f4 process_one_work+0x20c/0x5f8 worker_thread+0x1b0/0x35c kthread+0x144/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #1 ((softirq_ctrl.lock)){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_release+0x250/0x348 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x7c/0x240 __netdev_alloc_skb+0x1b4/0x1d8 gem_rx_refill+0xdc/0x240 gem_init_rings+0xb4/0x108 macb_mac_link_up+0x9c/0x2b4 phylink_resolve+0x170/0x614 process_one_work+0x20c/0x5f8 worker_thread+0x1b0/0x35c kthread+0x144/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 -> #0 (&bp->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x15a8/0x2084 lock_acquire+0x1cc/0x350 rt_spin_lock+0x50/0x1f0 macb_start_xmit+0x808/0xb7c dev_hard_start_xmit+0x94/0x284 sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x37c __dev_queue_xmit+0x708/0x1120 neigh_resolve_output+0x148/0x28c ip6_finish_output2+0x2c0/0xb2c __ip6_finish_output+0x114/0x308 ip6_output+0xc4/0x4a4 mld_sendpack+0x220/0x68c mld_ifc_work+0x2a8/0x4f4 process_one_work+0x20c/0x5f8 worker_thread+0x1b0/0x35c kthread+0x144/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &bp->lock --> _xmit_ETHER#2 --> &queue->tx_ptr_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&queue->tx_ptr_lock); lock(_xmit_ETHER#2); lock(&queue->tx_ptr_lock); lock(&bp->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** Call trace: show_stack+0x18/0x24 (C) dump_stack_lvl+0xa0/0xf0 dump_stack+0x18/0x24 print_circular_bug+0x28c/0x370 check_noncircular+0x198/0x1ac __lock_acquire+0x15a8/0x2084 lock_acquire+0x1cc/0x350 rt_spin_lock+0x50/0x1f0 macb_start_xmit+0x808/0xb7c dev_hard_start_xmit+0x94/0x284 sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x37c __dev_queue_xmit+0x708/0x1120 neigh_resolve_output+0x148/0x28c ip6_finish_output2+0x2c0/0xb2c __ip6_finish_output+0x114/0x308 ip6_output+0xc4/0x4a4 mld_sendpack+0x220/0x68c mld_ifc_work+0x2a8/0x4f4 process_one_work+0x20c/0x5f8 worker_thread+0x1b0/0x35c kthread+0x144/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Notably, invoking the mog_init_rings() callback upon link establishment is unnecessary. Instead, we can exclusively call mog_init_rings() within the ndo_open() callback. This adjustment resolves the deadlock issue. Furthermore, since MACB_CAPS_MACB_IS_EMAC cases do not use mog_init_rings() when opening the network interface via at91ether_open(), moving mog_init_rings() to macb_open() also eliminates the MACB_CAPS_MACB_IS_EMAC check. Fixes: 633e98a ("net: macb: use resolved link config in mac_link_up()") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Suggested-by: Kevin Hao <kexin.hao@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Wang <xiaolei.wang@windriver.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222015624.1994551-1-xiaolei.wang@windriver.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 2, 2026
ctx->tcxt_list holds the tasks using this ring, and it's currently
protected by the normal ctx->uring_lock. However, this can cause a
circular locking issue, as reported by syzbot, where cancelations off
exec end up needing to remove an entry from this list:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
syzkaller #0 Tainted: G L
------------------------------------------------------
syz.0.9999/12287 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88805851c0a8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: io_uring_del_tctx_node+0xf0/0x2c0 io_uring/tctx.c:179
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88802db5a2e0 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: prepare_bprm_creds fs/exec.c:1360 [inline]
ffff88802db5a2e0 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bprm_execve+0xb9/0x1400 fs/exec.c:1733
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:614 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x187/0x1350 kernel/locking/mutex.c:776
proc_pid_attr_write+0x547/0x630 fs/proc/base.c:2837
vfs_write+0x27e/0xb30 fs/read_write.c:684
ksys_write+0x145/0x250 fs/read_write.c:738
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xec/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #1 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}:
percpu_down_read_internal include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:53 [inline]
percpu_down_read_freezable include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:83 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs/super.h:19 [inline]
sb_start_write+0x4d/0x1c0 include/linux/fs/super.h:125
mnt_want_write+0x41/0x90 fs/namespace.c:499
open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:4529 [inline]
path_openat+0xadd/0x3dd0 fs/namei.c:4784
do_filp_open+0x1fa/0x410 fs/namei.c:4814
io_openat2+0x3e0/0x5c0 io_uring/openclose.c:143
__io_issue_sqe+0x181/0x4b0 io_uring/io_uring.c:1792
io_issue_sqe+0x165/0x1060 io_uring/io_uring.c:1815
io_queue_sqe io_uring/io_uring.c:2042 [inline]
io_submit_sqe io_uring/io_uring.c:2320 [inline]
io_submit_sqes+0xbf4/0x2140 io_uring/io_uring.c:2434
__do_sys_io_uring_enter io_uring/io_uring.c:3280 [inline]
__se_sys_io_uring_enter+0x2e0/0x2b60 io_uring/io_uring.c:3219
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xec/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #0 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3165 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x15a6/0x2cf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237
lock_acquire+0x107/0x340 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:614 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x187/0x1350 kernel/locking/mutex.c:776
io_uring_del_tctx_node+0xf0/0x2c0 io_uring/tctx.c:179
io_uring_clean_tctx+0xd4/0x1a0 io_uring/tctx.c:195
io_uring_cancel_generic+0x6ca/0x7d0 io_uring/cancel.c:646
io_uring_task_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:24 [inline]
begin_new_exec+0x10ed/0x2440 fs/exec.c:1131
load_elf_binary+0x9f8/0x2d70 fs/binfmt_elf.c:1010
search_binary_handler fs/exec.c:1669 [inline]
exec_binprm fs/exec.c:1701 [inline]
bprm_execve+0x92e/0x1400 fs/exec.c:1753
do_execveat_common+0x510/0x6a0 fs/exec.c:1859
do_execve fs/exec.c:1933 [inline]
__do_sys_execve fs/exec.c:2009 [inline]
__se_sys_execve fs/exec.c:2004 [inline]
__x64_sys_execve+0x94/0xb0 fs/exec.c:2004
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xec/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&ctx->uring_lock --> sb_writers#3 --> &sig->cred_guard_mutex
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&sig->cred_guard_mutex);
lock(sb_writers#3);
lock(&sig->cred_guard_mutex);
lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by syz.0.9999/12287:
#0: ffff88802db5a2e0 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: prepare_bprm_creds fs/exec.c:1360 [inline]
#0: ffff88802db5a2e0 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bprm_execve+0xb9/0x1400 fs/exec.c:1733
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 12287 Comm: syz.0.9999 Tainted: G L syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full)
Tainted: [L]=SOFTLOCKUP
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/25/2025
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0xe8/0x150 lib/dump_stack.c:120
print_circular_bug+0x2e2/0x300 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2043
check_noncircular+0x12e/0x150 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3165 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x15a6/0x2cf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237
lock_acquire+0x107/0x340 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:614 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x187/0x1350 kernel/locking/mutex.c:776
io_uring_del_tctx_node+0xf0/0x2c0 io_uring/tctx.c:179
io_uring_clean_tctx+0xd4/0x1a0 io_uring/tctx.c:195
io_uring_cancel_generic+0x6ca/0x7d0 io_uring/cancel.c:646
io_uring_task_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:24 [inline]
begin_new_exec+0x10ed/0x2440 fs/exec.c:1131
load_elf_binary+0x9f8/0x2d70 fs/binfmt_elf.c:1010
search_binary_handler fs/exec.c:1669 [inline]
exec_binprm fs/exec.c:1701 [inline]
bprm_execve+0x92e/0x1400 fs/exec.c:1753
do_execveat_common+0x510/0x6a0 fs/exec.c:1859
do_execve fs/exec.c:1933 [inline]
__do_sys_execve fs/exec.c:2009 [inline]
__se_sys_execve fs/exec.c:2004 [inline]
__x64_sys_execve+0x94/0xb0 fs/exec.c:2004
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xec/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7ff3a8b8f749
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ff3a9a97038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000003b
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ff3a8de5fa0 RCX: 00007ff3a8b8f749
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000200000000400
RBP: 00007ff3a8c13f91 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007ff3a8de6038 R14: 00007ff3a8de5fa0 R15: 00007ff3a8f0fa28
</TASK>
Add a separate lock just for the tctx_list, tctx_lock. This can nest
under ->uring_lock, where necessary, and be used separately for list
manipulation. For the cancelation off exec side, this removes the
need to grab ->uring_lock, hence fixing the circular locking
dependency.
Reported-by: syzbot+b0e3b77ffaa8a4067ce5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2026
After rename exchanging (either with the rename exchange operation or regular renames in multiple non-atomic steps) two inodes and at least one of them is a directory, we can end up with a log tree that contains only of the inodes and after a power failure that can result in an attempt to delete the other inode when it should not because it was not deleted before the power failure. In some case that delete attempt fails when the target inode is a directory that contains a subvolume inside it, since the log replay code is not prepared to deal with directory entries that point to root items (only inode items). 1) We have directories "dir1" (inode A) and "dir2" (inode B) under the same parent directory; 2) We have a file (inode C) under directory "dir1" (inode A); 3) We have a subvolume inside directory "dir2" (inode B); 4) All these inodes were persisted in a past transaction and we are currently at transaction N; 5) We rename the file (inode C), so at btrfs_log_new_name() we update inode C's last_unlink_trans to N; 6) We get a rename exchange for "dir1" (inode A) and "dir2" (inode B), so after the exchange "dir1" is inode B and "dir2" is inode A. During the rename exchange we call btrfs_log_new_name() for inodes A and B, but because they are directories, we don't update their last_unlink_trans to N; 7) An fsync against the file (inode C) is done, and because its inode has a last_unlink_trans with a value of N we log its parent directory (inode A) (through btrfs_log_all_parents(), called from btrfs_log_inode_parent()). 8) So we end up with inode B not logged, which now has the old name of inode A. At copy_inode_items_to_log(), when logging inode A, we did not check if we had any conflicting inode to log because inode A has a generation lower than the current transaction (created in a past transaction); 9) After a power failure, when replaying the log tree, since we find that inode A has a new name that conflicts with the name of inode B in the fs tree, we attempt to delete inode B... this is wrong since that directory was never deleted before the power failure, and because there is a subvolume inside that directory, attempting to delete it will fail since replay_dir_deletes() and btrfs_unlink_inode() are not prepared to deal with dir items that point to roots instead of inodes. When that happens the mount fails and we get a stack trace like the following: [87.2314] BTRFS info (device dm-0): start tree-log replay [87.2318] BTRFS critical (device dm-0): failed to delete reference to subvol, root 5 inode 256 parent 259 [87.2332] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [87.2338] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2) [87.2346] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 638968 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:4345 __btrfs_unlink_inode+0x416/0x440 [btrfs] [87.2368] Modules linked in: btrfs loop dm_thin_pool (...) [87.2470] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 638968 Comm: mount Tainted: G W 6.18.0-rc7-btrfs-next-218+ #2 PREEMPT(full) [87.2489] Tainted: [W]=WARN [87.2494] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-0-gea1b7a073390-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [87.2514] RIP: 0010:__btrfs_unlink_inode+0x416/0x440 [btrfs] [87.2538] Code: c0 89 04 24 (...) [87.2568] RSP: 0018:ffffc0e741f4b9b8 EFLAGS: 00010286 [87.2574] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9d3ec8a6cf60 RCX: 0000000000000000 [87.2582] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: ffffffff84ab45a1 RDI: 00000000ffffffff [87.2591] RBP: ffff9d3ec8a6ef20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffc0e741f4b840 [87.2599] R10: ffff9d45dc1fffa8 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ffff9d3ee26d77e0 [87.2608] R13: ffffc0e741f4ba98 R14: ffff9d4458040800 R15: ffff9d44b6b7ca10 [87.2618] FS: 00007f7b9603a840(0000) GS:ffff9d4658982000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [87.2629] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [87.2637] CR2: 00007ffc9ec33b98 CR3: 000000011273e003 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 [87.2648] Call Trace: [87.2651] <TASK> [87.2654] btrfs_unlink_inode+0x15/0x40 [btrfs] [87.2661] unlink_inode_for_log_replay+0x27/0xf0 [btrfs] [87.2669] check_item_in_log+0x1ea/0x2c0 [btrfs] [87.2676] replay_dir_deletes+0x16b/0x380 [btrfs] [87.2684] fixup_inode_link_count+0x34b/0x370 [btrfs] [87.2696] fixup_inode_link_counts+0x41/0x160 [btrfs] [87.2703] btrfs_recover_log_trees+0x1ff/0x7c0 [btrfs] [87.2711] ? __pfx_replay_one_buffer+0x10/0x10 [btrfs] [87.2719] open_ctree+0x10bb/0x15f0 [btrfs] [87.2726] btrfs_get_tree.cold+0xb/0x16c [btrfs] [87.2734] ? fscontext_read+0x15c/0x180 [87.2740] ? rw_verify_area+0x50/0x180 [87.2746] vfs_get_tree+0x25/0xd0 [87.2750] vfs_cmd_create+0x59/0xe0 [87.2755] __do_sys_fsconfig+0x4f6/0x6b0 [87.2760] do_syscall_64+0x50/0x1220 [87.2764] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [87.2770] RIP: 0033:0x7f7b9625f4aa [87.2775] Code: 73 01 c3 48 (...) [87.2803] RSP: 002b:00007ffc9ec35b08 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000001af [87.2817] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000558bfa91ac20 RCX: 00007f7b9625f4aa [87.2829] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000006 RDI: 0000000000000003 [87.2842] RBP: 0000558bfa91b120 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [87.2854] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [87.2864] R13: 00007f7b963f1580 R14: 00007f7b963f326c R15: 00007f7b963d8a23 [87.2877] </TASK> [87.2882] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [87.2891] BTRFS: error (device dm-0 state A) in __btrfs_unlink_inode:4345: errno=-2 No such entry [87.2904] BTRFS: error (device dm-0 state EAO) in do_abort_log_replay:191: errno=-2 No such entry [87.2915] BTRFS critical (device dm-0 state EAO): log tree (for root 5) leaf currently being processed (slot 7 key (258 12 257)): [87.2929] BTRFS info (device dm-0 state EAO): leaf 30736384 gen 10 total ptrs 7 free space 15712 owner 18446744073709551610 [87.2929] BTRFS info (device dm-0 state EAO): refs 3 lock_owner 0 current 638968 [87.2929] item 0 key (257 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160 [87.2929] inode generation 9 transid 10 size 0 nbytes 0 [87.2929] block group 0 mode 40755 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 [87.2929] rdev 0 sequence 7 flags 0x0 [87.2929] atime 1765464494.678070921 [87.2929] ctime 1765464494.686606513 [87.2929] mtime 1765464494.686606513 [87.2929] otime 1765464494.678070921 [87.2929] item 1 key (257 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 16109 itemsize 14 [87.2929] index 4 name_len 4 [87.2929] item 2 key (257 DIR_LOG_INDEX 2) itemoff 16101 itemsize 8 [87.2929] dir log end 2 [87.2929] item 3 key (257 DIR_LOG_INDEX 3) itemoff 16093 itemsize 8 [87.2929] dir log end 18446744073709551615 [87.2930] item 4 key (257 DIR_INDEX 3) itemoff 16060 itemsize 33 [87.2930] location key (258 1 0) type 1 [87.2930] transid 10 data_len 0 name_len 3 [87.2930] item 5 key (258 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 15900 itemsize 160 [87.2930] inode generation 9 transid 10 size 0 nbytes 0 [87.2930] block group 0 mode 100644 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 [87.2930] rdev 0 sequence 2 flags 0x0 [87.2930] atime 1765464494.678456467 [87.2930] ctime 1765464494.686606513 [87.2930] mtime 1765464494.678456467 [87.2930] otime 1765464494.678456467 [87.2930] item 6 key (258 INODE_REF 257) itemoff 15887 itemsize 13 [87.2930] index 3 name_len 3 [87.2930] BTRFS critical (device dm-0 state EAO): log replay failed in unlink_inode_for_log_replay:1045 for root 5, stage 3, with error -2: failed to unlink inode 256 parent dir 259 name subvol root 5 [87.2963] BTRFS: error (device dm-0 state EAO) in btrfs_recover_log_trees:7743: errno=-2 No such entry [87.2981] BTRFS: error (device dm-0 state EAO) in btrfs_replay_log:2083: errno=-2 No such entry (Failed to recover log tr So fix this by changing copy_inode_items_to_log() to always detect if there are conflicting inodes for the ref/extref of the inode being logged even if the inode was created in a past transaction. A test case for fstests will follow soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 8, 2026
…te in qfq_reset `qfq_class->leaf_qdisc->q.qlen > 0` does not imply that the class itself is active. Two qfq_class objects may point to the same leaf_qdisc. This happens when: 1. one QFQ qdisc is attached to the dev as the root qdisc, and 2. another QFQ qdisc is temporarily referenced (e.g., via qdisc_get() / qdisc_put()) and is pending to be destroyed, as in function tc_new_tfilter. When packets are enqueued through the root QFQ qdisc, the shared leaf_qdisc->q.qlen increases. At the same time, the second QFQ qdisc triggers qdisc_put and qdisc_destroy: the qdisc enters qfq_reset() with its own q->q.qlen == 0, but its class's leaf qdisc->q.qlen > 0. Therefore, the qfq_reset would wrongly deactivate an inactive aggregate and trigger a null-deref in qfq_deactivate_agg: [ 0.903172] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 [ 0.903571] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode [ 0.903860] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page [ 0.904177] PGD 10299b067 P4D 10299b067 PUD 10299c067 PMD 0 [ 0.904502] Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI [ 0.904737] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 135 Comm: exploit Not tainted 6.19.0-rc3+ #2 NONE [ 0.905157] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.17.0-0-gb52ca86e094d-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 0.905754] RIP: 0010:qfq_deactivate_agg (include/linux/list.h:992 (discriminator 2) include/linux/list.h:1006 (discriminator 2) net/sched/sch_qfq.c:1367 (discriminator 2) net/sched/sch_qfq.c:1393 (discriminator 2)) [ 0.906046] Code: 0f 84 4d 01 00 00 48 89 70 18 8b 4b 10 48 c7 c2 ff ff ff ff 48 8b 78 08 48 d3 e2 48 21 f2 48 2b 13 48 8b 30 48 d3 ea 8b 4b 18 0 Code starting with the faulting instruction =========================================== 0: 0f 84 4d 01 00 00 je 0x153 6: 48 89 70 18 mov %rsi,0x18(%rax) a: 8b 4b 10 mov 0x10(%rbx),%ecx d: 48 c7 c2 ff ff ff ff mov $0xffffffffffffffff,%rdx 14: 48 8b 78 08 mov 0x8(%rax),%rdi 18: 48 d3 e2 shl %cl,%rdx 1b: 48 21 f2 and %rsi,%rdx 1e: 48 2b 13 sub (%rbx),%rdx 21: 48 8b 30 mov (%rax),%rsi 24: 48 d3 ea shr %cl,%rdx 27: 8b 4b 18 mov 0x18(%rbx),%ecx ... [ 0.907095] RSP: 0018:ffffc900004a39a0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 0.907368] RAX: ffff8881043a0880 RBX: ffff888102953340 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 0.907723] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 [ 0.908100] RBP: ffff888102952180 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 0.908451] R10: ffff8881043a0000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff888102952000 [ 0.908804] R13: ffff888102952180 R14: ffff8881043a0ad8 R15: ffff8881043a0880 [ 0.909179] FS: 000000002a1a0380(0000) GS:ffff888196d8d000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 0.909572] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 0.909857] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000102993002 CR4: 0000000000772ef0 [ 0.910247] PKRU: 55555554 [ 0.910391] Call Trace: [ 0.910527] <TASK> [ 0.910638] qfq_reset_qdisc (net/sched/sch_qfq.c:357 net/sched/sch_qfq.c:1485) [ 0.910826] qdisc_reset (include/linux/skbuff.h:2195 include/linux/skbuff.h:2501 include/linux/skbuff.h:3424 include/linux/skbuff.h:3430 net/sched/sch_generic.c:1036) [ 0.911040] __qdisc_destroy (net/sched/sch_generic.c:1076) [ 0.911236] tc_new_tfilter (net/sched/cls_api.c:2447) [ 0.911447] rtnetlink_rcv_msg (net/core/rtnetlink.c:6958) [ 0.911663] ? __pfx_rtnetlink_rcv_msg (net/core/rtnetlink.c:6861) [ 0.911894] netlink_rcv_skb (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2550) [ 0.912100] netlink_unicast (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1344) [ 0.912296] ? __alloc_skb (net/core/skbuff.c:706) [ 0.912484] netlink_sendmsg (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1894) [ 0.912682] sock_write_iter (net/socket.c:727 (discriminator 1) net/socket.c:742 (discriminator 1) net/socket.c:1195 (discriminator 1)) [ 0.912880] vfs_write (fs/read_write.c:593 fs/read_write.c:686) [ 0.913077] ksys_write (fs/read_write.c:738) [ 0.913252] do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 (discriminator 1) arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 (discriminator 1)) [ 0.913438] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:131) [ 0.913687] RIP: 0033:0x424c34 [ 0.913844] Code: 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb bd 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 80 3d 2d 44 09 00 00 74 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 9 Code starting with the faulting instruction =========================================== 0: 89 02 mov %eax,(%rdx) 2: 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff mov $0xffffffffffffffff,%rax 9: eb bd jmp 0xffffffffffffffc8 b: 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 cs nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1) 12: 00 00 00 15: 90 nop 16: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 1a: 80 3d 2d 44 09 00 00 cmpb $0x0,0x9442d(%rip) # 0x9444e 21: 74 13 je 0x36 23: b8 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%eax 28: 0f 05 syscall 2a: 09 .byte 0x9 [ 0.914807] RSP: 002b:00007ffea1938b78 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ 0.915197] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000424c34 [ 0.915556] RDX: 000000000000003c RSI: 000000002af378c0 RDI: 0000000000000003 [ 0.915912] RBP: 00007ffea1938bc0 R08: 00000000004b8820 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 0.916297] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007ffea1938d28 [ 0.916652] R13: 00007ffea1938d38 R14: 00000000004b3828 R15: 0000000000000001 [ 0.917039] </TASK> [ 0.917158] Modules linked in: [ 0.917316] CR2: 0000000000000000 [ 0.917484] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 0.917717] RIP: 0010:qfq_deactivate_agg (include/linux/list.h:992 (discriminator 2) include/linux/list.h:1006 (discriminator 2) net/sched/sch_qfq.c:1367 (discriminator 2) net/sched/sch_qfq.c:1393 (discriminator 2)) [ 0.917978] Code: 0f 84 4d 01 00 00 48 89 70 18 8b 4b 10 48 c7 c2 ff ff ff ff 48 8b 78 08 48 d3 e2 48 21 f2 48 2b 13 48 8b 30 48 d3 ea 8b 4b 18 0 Code starting with the faulting instruction =========================================== 0: 0f 84 4d 01 00 00 je 0x153 6: 48 89 70 18 mov %rsi,0x18(%rax) a: 8b 4b 10 mov 0x10(%rbx),%ecx d: 48 c7 c2 ff ff ff ff mov $0xffffffffffffffff,%rdx 14: 48 8b 78 08 mov 0x8(%rax),%rdi 18: 48 d3 e2 shl %cl,%rdx 1b: 48 21 f2 and %rsi,%rdx 1e: 48 2b 13 sub (%rbx),%rdx 21: 48 8b 30 mov (%rax),%rsi 24: 48 d3 ea shr %cl,%rdx 27: 8b 4b 18 mov 0x18(%rbx),%ecx ... [ 0.918902] RSP: 0018:ffffc900004a39a0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 0.919198] RAX: ffff8881043a0880 RBX: ffff888102953340 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 0.919559] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 [ 0.919908] RBP: ffff888102952180 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 0.920289] R10: ffff8881043a0000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff888102952000 [ 0.920648] R13: ffff888102952180 R14: ffff8881043a0ad8 R15: ffff8881043a0880 [ 0.921014] FS: 000000002a1a0380(0000) GS:ffff888196d8d000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 0.921424] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 0.921710] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000102993002 CR4: 0000000000772ef0 [ 0.922097] PKRU: 55555554 [ 0.922240] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception [ 0.922590] Kernel Offset: disabled Fixes: 0545a30 ("pkt_sched: QFQ - quick fair queue scheduler") Signed-off-by: Xiang Mei <xmei5@asu.edu> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260106034100.1780779-1-xmei5@asu.edu Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2026
…ked_inode() In btrfs_read_locked_inode() we are calling btrfs_init_file_extent_tree() while holding a path with a read locked leaf from a subvolume tree, and btrfs_init_file_extent_tree() may do a GFP_KERNEL allocation, which can trigger reclaim. This can create a circular lock dependency which lockdep warns about with the following splat: [6.1433] ====================================================== [6.1574] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [6.1583] 6.18.0+ #4 Tainted: G U [6.1591] ------------------------------------------------------ [6.1599] kswapd0/117 is trying to acquire lock: [6.1606] ffff8d9b6333c5b8 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0 [6.1625] but task is already holding lock: [6.1633] ffffffffa4ab8ce0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0x195/0xc60 [6.1646] which lock already depends on the new lock. [6.1657] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [6.1667] -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: [6.1677] fs_reclaim_acquire+0x9d/0xd0 [6.1685] __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x59/0x750 [6.1694] btrfs_init_file_extent_tree+0x90/0x100 [6.1702] btrfs_read_locked_inode+0xc3/0x6b0 [6.1710] btrfs_iget+0xbb/0xf0 [6.1716] btrfs_lookup_dentry+0x3c5/0x8e0 [6.1724] btrfs_lookup+0x12/0x30 [6.1731] lookup_open.isra.0+0x1aa/0x6a0 [6.1739] path_openat+0x5f7/0xc60 [6.1746] do_filp_open+0xd6/0x180 [6.1753] do_sys_openat2+0x8b/0xe0 [6.1760] __x64_sys_openat+0x54/0xa0 [6.1768] do_syscall_64+0x97/0x3e0 [6.1776] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [6.1784] -> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: [6.1794] lock_release+0x127/0x2a0 [6.1801] up_read+0x1b/0x30 [6.1808] btrfs_search_slot+0x8e0/0xff0 [6.1817] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x52/0xd0 [6.1825] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x73/0x520 [6.1833] btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x11a/0x120 [6.1842] btrfs_log_inode+0x608/0x1aa0 [6.1849] btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x249/0xf80 [6.1857] btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x3e/0x60 [6.1865] btrfs_sync_file+0x431/0x690 [6.1872] do_fsync+0x39/0x80 [6.1879] __x64_sys_fsync+0x13/0x20 [6.1887] do_syscall_64+0x97/0x3e0 [6.1894] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [6.1903] -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [6.1913] __lock_acquire+0x15e9/0x2820 [6.1920] lock_acquire+0xc9/0x2d0 [6.1927] __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x10a0 [6.1934] __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0 [6.1944] btrfs_evict_inode+0x20b/0x4b0 [6.1952] evict+0x15a/0x2f0 [6.1958] prune_icache_sb+0x91/0xd0 [6.1966] super_cache_scan+0x150/0x1d0 [6.1974] do_shrink_slab+0x155/0x6f0 [6.1981] shrink_slab+0x48e/0x890 [6.1988] shrink_one+0x11a/0x1f0 [6.1995] shrink_node+0xbfd/0x1320 [6.1002] balance_pgdat+0x67f/0xc60 [6.1321] kswapd+0x1dc/0x3e0 [6.1643] kthread+0xff/0x240 [6.1965] ret_from_fork+0x223/0x280 [6.1287] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [6.1616] other info that might help us debug this: [6.1561] Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> btrfs-tree-00 --> fs_reclaim [6.1503] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [6.1110] CPU0 CPU1 [6.1411] ---- ---- [6.1707] lock(fs_reclaim); [6.1998] lock(btrfs-tree-00); [6.1291] lock(fs_reclaim); [6.1581] lock(&delayed_node->mutex); [6.1874] *** DEADLOCK *** [6.1716] 2 locks held by kswapd0/117: [6.1999] #0: ffffffffa4ab8ce0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0x195/0xc60 [6.1294] #1: ffff8d998344b0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#40){++++}- {3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x37/0x1d0 [6.1596] stack backtrace: [6.1183] CPU: 11 UID: 0 PID: 117 Comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G U 6.18.0+ #4 PREEMPT(lazy) [6.1185] Tainted: [U]=USER [6.1186] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 2001 02/01/2023 [6.1187] Call Trace: [6.1187] <TASK> [6.1189] dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0xa0 [6.1192] print_circular_bug.cold+0x17a/0x1c0 [6.1194] check_noncircular+0x175/0x190 [6.1197] __lock_acquire+0x15e9/0x2820 [6.1200] lock_acquire+0xc9/0x2d0 [6.1201] ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0 [6.1204] __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x10a0 [6.1206] ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0 [6.1208] ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0 [6.1211] ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0 [6.1213] __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x39/0x2f0 [6.1215] btrfs_evict_inode+0x20b/0x4b0 [6.1217] ? lock_acquire+0xc9/0x2d0 [6.1220] evict+0x15a/0x2f0 [6.1222] prune_icache_sb+0x91/0xd0 [6.1224] super_cache_scan+0x150/0x1d0 [6.1226] do_shrink_slab+0x155/0x6f0 [6.1228] shrink_slab+0x48e/0x890 [6.1229] ? shrink_slab+0x2d2/0x890 [6.1231] shrink_one+0x11a/0x1f0 [6.1234] shrink_node+0xbfd/0x1320 [6.1236] ? shrink_node+0xa2d/0x1320 [6.1236] ? shrink_node+0xbd3/0x1320 [6.1239] ? balance_pgdat+0x67f/0xc60 [6.1239] balance_pgdat+0x67f/0xc60 [6.1241] ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0xc4/0x2a0 [6.1246] kswapd+0x1dc/0x3e0 [6.1247] ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10 [6.1249] ? __pfx_kswapd+0x10/0x10 [6.1250] kthread+0xff/0x240 [6.1251] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [6.1253] ret_from_fork+0x223/0x280 [6.1255] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [6.1257] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [6.1260] </TASK> This is because: 1) The fsync task is holding an inode's delayed node mutex (for a directory) while calling __btrfs_update_delayed_inode() and that needs to do a search on the subvolume's btree (therefore read lock some extent buffers); 2) The lookup task, at btrfs_lookup(), triggered reclaim with the GFP_KERNEL allocation done by btrfs_init_file_extent_tree() while holding a read lock on a subvolume leaf; 3) The reclaim triggered kswapd which is doing inode eviction for the directory inode the fsync task is using as an argument to btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode() - but in that call chain we are trying to read lock the same leaf that the lookup task is holding while calling btrfs_init_file_extent_tree() and doing the GFP_KERNEL allocation. Fix this by calling btrfs_init_file_extent_tree() after we don't need the path anymore and release it in btrfs_read_locked_inode(). Reported-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6e55113a22347c3925458a5d840a18401a38b276.camel@linux.intel.com/ Fixes: 8679d26 ("btrfs: initialize inode::file_extent_tree after i_mode has been set") Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2026
The GPIO controller is configured as non-sleeping but it uses generic
pinctrl helpers which use a mutex for synchronization.
This can cause the following lockdep splat with shared GPIOs enabled on
boards which have multiple devices using the same GPIO:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
kernel/locking/mutex.c:591
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 12, name:
kworker/u16:0
preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
6 locks held by kworker/u16:0/12:
#0: ffff0001f0018d48 ((wq_completion)events_unbound#2){+.+.}-{0:0},
at: process_one_work+0x18c/0x604
#1: ffff8000842dbdf0 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
process_one_work+0x1b4/0x604
#2: ffff0001f18498f8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at:
__device_attach+0x38/0x1b0
#3: ffff0001f75f1e90 (&gdev->srcu){.+.?}-{0:0}, at:
gpiod_direction_output_raw_commit+0x0/0x360
#4: ffff0001f46e3db8 (&shared_desc->spinlock){....}-{3:3}, at:
gpio_shared_proxy_direction_output+0xd0/0x144 [gpio_shared_proxy]
#5: ffff0001f180ee90 (&gdev->srcu){.+.?}-{0:0}, at:
gpiod_direction_output_raw_commit+0x0/0x360
irq event stamp: 81450
hardirqs last enabled at (81449): [<ffff8000813acba4>]
_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x74/0x78
hardirqs last disabled at (81450): [<ffff8000813abfb8>]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x84/0x88
softirqs last enabled at (79616): [<ffff8000811455fc>]
__alloc_skb+0x17c/0x1e8
softirqs last disabled at (79614): [<ffff8000811455fc>]
__alloc_skb+0x17c/0x1e8
CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/u16:0 Not tainted
6.19.0-rc4-next-20260105+ #11975 PREEMPT
Hardware name: Hardkernel ODROID-M1 (DT)
Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func
Call trace:
show_stack+0x18/0x24 (C)
dump_stack_lvl+0x90/0xd0
dump_stack+0x18/0x24
__might_resched+0x144/0x248
__might_sleep+0x48/0x98
__mutex_lock+0x5c/0x894
mutex_lock_nested+0x24/0x30
pinctrl_get_device_gpio_range+0x44/0x128
pinctrl_gpio_direction+0x3c/0xe0
pinctrl_gpio_direction_output+0x14/0x20
rockchip_gpio_direction_output+0xb8/0x19c
gpiochip_direction_output+0x38/0x94
gpiod_direction_output_raw_commit+0x1d8/0x360
gpiod_direction_output_nonotify+0x7c/0x230
gpiod_direction_output+0x34/0xf8
gpio_shared_proxy_direction_output+0xec/0x144 [gpio_shared_proxy]
gpiochip_direction_output+0x38/0x94
gpiod_direction_output_raw_commit+0x1d8/0x360
gpiod_direction_output_nonotify+0x7c/0x230
gpiod_configure_flags+0xbc/0x480
gpiod_find_and_request+0x1a0/0x574
gpiod_get_index+0x58/0x84
devm_gpiod_get_index+0x20/0xb4
devm_gpiod_get_optional+0x18/0x30
rockchip_pcie_probe+0x98/0x380
platform_probe+0x5c/0xac
really_probe+0xbc/0x298
Fixes: 936ee26 ("gpio/rockchip: add driver for rockchip gpio")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/d035fc29-3b03-4cd6-b8ec-001f93540bc6@samsung.com/
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260106090011.21603-1-bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In 3.10 merge window, proc_dir_entry is now private to proc. However,
Lustre lprocfs depends heavily on it and its now-gone read_proc_t and
write_proc_t members.
The patch largely changed the fact, and made lprocfs depend on none of
proc_dir_entry private members. All lprocfs callers are converted to
use the new seq_file scheme.
Also lprocfs_srch is removed so that we can drop lprocfs_lock. All callers
are changed to save created pde in proper place.
See https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3319 for more details.
Signed-off-by: Peng Tao tao.peng@emc.com