Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
39 changes: 19 additions & 20 deletions crates/chain/src/keychain/txout_index.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ pub struct KeychainTxOutIndex<K> {
inner: SpkTxOutIndex<(K, u32)>,
// descriptors of each keychain
keychains: BTreeMap<K, Descriptor<DescriptorPublicKey>>,
// last stored indexes
// last revealed indexes
last_revealed: BTreeMap<K, u32>,
// lookahead settings for each keychain
lookahead: BTreeMap<K, u32>,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -381,40 +381,39 @@ impl<K: Clone + Ord + Debug> KeychainTxOutIndex<K> {
let has_wildcard = descriptor.has_wildcard();

let target_index = if has_wildcard { target_index } else { 0 };
let next_store_index = self.next_store_index(keychain);
let next_reveal_index = self.last_revealed.get(keychain).map_or(0, |v| *v + 1);
let lookahead = self.lookahead.get(keychain).map_or(0, |v| *v);

// if we can reveal new indexes, the latest revealed index goes here
let mut revealed_index = None;
debug_assert_eq!(
next_reveal_index + lookahead,
self.next_store_index(keychain)
);

// if we need to reveal new indices, the latest revealed index goes here
let mut reveal_to_index = None;
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe you should call this latest_reveal_index. It might remove the need to have a comment.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we probably need a comment anyway to inform that this variable is to be mutated "if we need to reveal new indices".


// if the target is already surpassed, we have nothing to reveal
if next_reveal_index <= target_index
// if the target is already stored (due to lookahead), this can be our newly revealed index
&& target_index < next_reveal_index + lookahead
{
revealed_index = Some(target_index);
// if the target is not yet revealed, but is already stored (due to lookahead), we need to
// set the `reveal_to_index` as target here (as the `for` loop below only updates
// `reveal_to_index` for indexes that are NOT stored)
if next_reveal_index <= target_index && target_index < next_reveal_index + lookahead {
reveal_to_index = Some(target_index);
}

// we range over indexes that are not stored
let range = next_reveal_index + lookahead..=target_index + lookahead;

for (new_index, new_spk) in range_descriptor_spks(Cow::Borrowed(descriptor), range) {
// no need to store if already stored
if new_index >= next_store_index {
let _inserted = self
.inner
.insert_spk((keychain.clone(), new_index), new_spk);
debug_assert!(_inserted, "must not have existing spk",);
}
let _inserted = self
.inner
.insert_spk((keychain.clone(), new_index), new_spk);
debug_assert!(_inserted, "must not have existing spk",);

// everything after `target_index` is stored for lookahead only
if new_index <= target_index {
revealed_index = Some(new_index);
reveal_to_index = Some(new_index);
}
}

match revealed_index {
match reveal_to_index {
Some(index) => {
let _old_index = self.last_revealed.insert(keychain.clone(), index);
debug_assert!(_old_index < Some(index));
Expand Down
55 changes: 48 additions & 7 deletions crates/chain/tests/test_keychain_txout_index.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ use bdk_chain::{
keychain::{DerivationAdditions, KeychainTxOutIndex},
};

use bitcoin::{secp256k1::Secp256k1, Script, Transaction, TxOut};
use bitcoin::{secp256k1::Secp256k1, OutPoint, Script, Transaction, TxOut};
use miniscript::{Descriptor, DescriptorPublicKey};

#[derive(Clone, Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Ord, PartialOrd)]
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -210,13 +210,54 @@ fn test_lookahead() {
last_internal_index as usize + 1,
);
}
}

// when:
// - scanning txouts with spks above last stored index
// expect:
// - cached scripts count should increase as expected
// - last stored index should increase as expected
// TODO!
// when:
// - scanning txouts with spks above last stored index
// expect:
// - last revealed index should increase as expected
// - last used index should change as expected
#[test]
fn test_scan_with_lookahead() {
let (mut txout_index, external_desc, _) = init_txout_index();
txout_index.set_lookahead_for_all(10);

let spks: BTreeMap<u32, Script> = [0, 10, 20, 30]
Comment thread
evanlinjin marked this conversation as resolved.
.into_iter()
.map(|i| (i, external_desc.at_derivation_index(i).script_pubkey()))
.collect();

for (&spk_i, spk) in &spks {
let op = OutPoint::new(h!("fake tx"), spk_i);
let txout = TxOut {
script_pubkey: spk.clone(),
value: 0,
};

let additions = txout_index.scan_txout(op, &txout);
assert_eq!(
additions.as_inner(),
&[(TestKeychain::External, spk_i)].into()
);
assert_eq!(
txout_index.last_revealed_index(&TestKeychain::External),
Some(spk_i)
);
assert_eq!(
txout_index.last_used_index(&TestKeychain::External),
Some(spk_i)
);
}

// now try with index 41 (lookahead surpassed), we expect that the txout to not be indexed
let spk_41 = external_desc.at_derivation_index(41).script_pubkey();
let op = OutPoint::new(h!("fake tx"), 41);
let txout = TxOut {
script_pubkey: spk_41,
value: 0,
};
let additions = txout_index.scan_txout(op, &txout);
assert!(additions.is_empty());
}

#[test]
Expand Down