Skip to content

vet: update lock file for trusted windows crates#7900

Merged
pchickey merged 1 commit intobytecodealliance:mainfrom
abrown:vet-update
Feb 8, 2024
Merged

vet: update lock file for trusted windows crates#7900
pchickey merged 1 commit intobytecodealliance:mainfrom
abrown:vet-update

Conversation

@abrown
Copy link
Member

@abrown abrown commented Feb 8, 2024

In #7846 I added cargo-vet entries to trust the windows crate, just like we already trust several related windows-* crates. I did not, however, update the lockfile, which means that #7807 continued to fail the cargo vet --locked CI check. This change is the result of simply running cargo vet.

In bytecodealliance#7846 I added `cargo-vet` entries to trust the `windows` crate, just
like we already trust several related `windows-*` crates. I did not,
however, update the lockfile, which means that bytecodealliance#7807 continued to fail
the `cargo vet --locked` CI check. This change is the result of simply
running `cargo vet`.
@abrown abrown requested a review from a team as a code owner February 8, 2024 21:40
@abrown abrown requested review from pchickey and removed request for a team February 8, 2024 21:40
abrown added a commit to abrown/wasmtime that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2024
When running `cargo vet` in bytecodealliance#7900, it warned me that we should consider
pruning some unused entries, etc. This is the result of running `cargo
vet prune`.
@pchickey pchickey added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 8, 2024
Merged via the queue into bytecodealliance:main with commit a747dc5 Feb 8, 2024
abrown added a commit to abrown/wasmtime that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2024
When running `cargo vet` in bytecodealliance#7900, it warned me that we should consider
pruning some unused entries, etc. This is the result of running `cargo
vet prune`.
@abrown abrown mentioned this pull request Feb 10, 2024
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2024
* vet: prune lockfile

When running `cargo vet` in #7900, it warned me that we should consider
pruning some unused entries, etc. This is the result of running `cargo
vet prune`.

* vet: a couple more post-#7908
@abrown abrown deleted the vet-update branch October 16, 2024 00:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants