Merged
Conversation
When running `cargo vet` in bytecodealliance#7900, it warned me that we should consider pruning some unused entries, etc. This is the result of running `cargo vet prune`.
Member
Member
|
Should we revert this one? |
abrown
added a commit
to abrown/wasmtime
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2024
This is a retry of bytecodealliance#7910 to fix some `cargo vet` warnings; it is the result of running `cargo vet prune`.
Merged
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2024
This is a retry of #7910 to fix some `cargo vet` warnings; it is the result of running `cargo vet prune`.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When running
cargo vetin #7900, it warned me that we should consider pruning some unused entries, etc. This is the result of runningcargo vet prune.