Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: parallelize NodeModulesScanner#211

Closed
acebytes wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
bolt-optimize-nodemodules-scanner-6889912269856652472
Closed

⚡ Bolt: parallelize NodeModulesScanner#211
acebytes wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
bolt-optimize-nodemodules-scanner-6889912269856652472

Conversation

@acebytes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@acebytes acebytes commented May 4, 2026

💡 What: Marked findNodeModules and directorySize in NodeModulesScanner as nonisolated to prevent task serialization on the actor. Replaced multiple FileManager check/attribute calls with a single URL.resourceValues(forKeys:) check. Passed the instance's FileManager as a parameter to the recursive calls instead of hardcoding FileManager.default.
🎯 Why: In Swift Concurrency, TaskGroup subtasks calling an isolated method on the same actor will be serialized on that actor's executor, destroying parallelism. Separately, combining existence and attribute checks reduces redundant filesystem syscalls. Passing the FileManager ensures the class remains testable and dependency injection isn't broken.
📊 Impact: Scanning performance is significantly increased because directory trees can now be searched genuinely in parallel. File system I/O overhead is reduced.
🔬 Measurement: Run the application and observe the latency for node_modules discovery, verifying that multiple cores are utilized.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 6889912269856652472 started by @acebytes

Marked `findNodeModules` and `directorySize` as `nonisolated` to allow `TaskGroup` subtasks to run in parallel on the global thread pool instead of being serialized on the actor. Combined separate `fileExists` and `attributesOfItem` calls into a single `URL.resourceValues` call. Passed `FileManager` as an argument to maintain dependency injection.

Co-authored-by: acebytes <2820910+acebytes@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 2f72f930d5

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +87 to +88
if let values = try? nodeModulesURL.resourceValues(forKeys: [.isDirectoryKey, .contentModificationDateKey]),
values.isDirectory == true {
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Handle symlinked node_modules directories

This check regresses detection of node_modules when the path is a symbolic link to a directory. URL.resourceValues(...).isDirectory reports false for symlinks, while the previous fileExists(atPath:isDirectory:) path treated a symlinked directory as a directory, so these projects are now silently omitted from scan results. This affects users who relocate node_modules via symlink (for example to another volume) and leads to under-reporting reclaimable disk usage.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@acebytes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

acebytes commented May 5, 2026

Closing as duplicate of #216 — same NodeModulesScanner refactor (nonisolated/static + URL.resourceValues consolidation).

@acebytes acebytes closed this May 5, 2026
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closing as duplicate of #216 — same NodeModulesScanner refactor (nonisolated/static + URL.resourceValues consolidation).

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is a duplicate and stopping work on this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant