Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop clamsproject/mmif-python#250 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 91.82% 87.07% -4.76%
===========================================
Files 8 9 +1
Lines 1040 1106 +66
===========================================
+ Hits 955 963 +8
- Misses 85 143 +58
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
keighrim
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overall looks good, and should be functional. But I think the PR can be improved with more polishing and adding unit tests.
- changed rewinder file name taking off mmif_. - changed _delete_last function name to be single underscored. - added CLI argument for number of views to rewind. - changed read_mmif from json.load() -> file.read()
5b75fdf to
f173a37
Compare
|
After giving some thought on the right place for the invocation (entrypoint) of the rewinder code, now I think the |
* optimized MMIF file I/O * added rewinding by number of apps (opposed to number of views, not exposed in CLI)
|
closing without merge as the issue is moved to |
Fixes clamsproject/clams-python#190