Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@jairovelasquez has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 36 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughReplaces the Sphinx extension recommonmark with sphinx_design in configs and docs, updates CI checkout to actions/checkout@v4, expands Common Storage docs, adds Math Blocks content (duplicated in one file), moves shebang, fixes trailing newline, and updates .coderabbit.yaml guidance. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~22 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Pre-merge checks❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
source/img/enable-shared-storage.pngis excluded by!**/*.png,!**/*.pngsource/img/guides/math-code-block.pngis excluded by!**/*.png,!**/*.pngsource/img/storage-assignment.pngis excluded by!**/*.png,!**/*.pngsource/img/storage-browser.pngis excluded by!**/*.png,!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
.github/workflows/deploy.yaml(1 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)algolia-config.json(1 hunks)find_unused_images.py(1 hunks)source/conf.py(1 hunks)source/instructors/authoring/guides/intro.rst(0 hunks)source/instructors/authoring/guides/markdown_content.rst(1 hunks)source/instructors/getstarted/support/changelog.rst(1 hunks)source/instructors/setupcourses/common-storage.rst(1 hunks)student-source/conf.py(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- source/instructors/authoring/guides/intro.rst
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.rst
⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
**/*.rst: Review files for:
- Consistent formatting (e.g., headings, lists, links).
- Clear and concise language.
- Correct grammar and spelling.
- Proper use of rst syntax (e.g., avoid broken links or invalid code blocks).
- Adherence to style guides (e.g., consistent tone, terminology).
Suggest improvements to enhance readability and accessibility.
Files:
source/instructors/setupcourses/common-storage.rstsource/instructors/getstarted/support/changelog.rstsource/instructors/authoring/guides/markdown_content.rst
🪛 Ruff (0.14.1)
find_unused_images.py
1-1: Shebang is present but file is not executable
(EXE001)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
README.md (1)
11-11: LGTM!The removal of
recommonmark==0.7.1from the installation command is consistent with the Sphinx configuration changes throughout the PR.algolia-config.json (1)
21-21: LGTM!Trailing newline added for consistency with file formatting conventions.
.github/workflows/deploy.yaml (2)
13-13: LGTM!The removal of
recommonmark==0.7.1aligns with the broader migration tosphinx_designacross the project.
16-16: Verify v4 compatibility against these breaking changes from v1.The upgrade from
v1tov4introduces several breaking changes. Review and confirm your workflow accounts for:
- Fetch depth: v4 defaults to shallow clone (single commit); add
fetch-depth: 0if you need full history or tags- Credentials: v4 persists auth tokens in git config by default; set
persist-credentials: falseif unwanted- Detached HEAD: v4 may create a local branch instead of leaving HEAD detached; update scripts that depend on detached state
- Submodules: Confirm submodule handling (v4 requires explicit
submodules: true/recursiveinput if needed)- Git LFS & sparse checkout: v4 exposes
lfsand sparse-checkout inputs; update if your workflow relies on thesestudent-source/conf.py (1)
68-68: LGTM!The addition of
sphinx_designmirrors the change insource/conf.py, maintaining consistency between instructor and student documentation configurations.source/instructors/getstarted/support/changelog.rst (2)
20-20: LGTM!The new changelog entry for Common Storage is clear and includes a proper reference link.
21-21: LGTM!The updated math block entry provides better clarity by specifying "using LaTeX" and includes a proper reference link.
source/instructors/authoring/guides/markdown_content.rst (1)
190-208: No duplication found. Original review concern is unfounded.The verification confirms only one "Math Blocks" section exists in the file (at line 190). The rg search would have returned all occurrences if duplicates existed. The new section appears correctly formatted with proper RST syntax and does not require removal.
Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
source/instructors/setupcourses/common-storage.rst (1)
1-62: Documentation structure and content look strong.The expanded guide with step-by-step instructions, clear headings, image references, and benefit sections significantly improves usability. The numbered lists and structural organization are well-executed and follow RST conventions. After addressing the minor grammar and syntax corrections above, this documentation will be ready.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
source/instructors/setupcourses/common-storage.rst (1)
19-19: Remove non-standard spacing syntax on Line 19.The single pipe character
|is non-standard reStructuredText and should be replaced with a blank line for proper rendering. This issue was flagged in a previous review and should be addressed.Apply this diff:
- Consistent path for code and terminal access -|
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.coderabbit.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/deploy.yaml(1 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)source/instructors/getstarted/support/changelog.rst(1 hunks)source/instructors/setupcourses/common-storage.rst(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.rst
⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
**/*.rst: Review files for:
- Consistent formatting (e.g., headings, lists, links).
- Clear and concise language.
- Correct grammar and spelling.
- Proper use of rst syntax (e.g., avoid broken links or invalid code blocks).
- Adherence to style guides (e.g., consistent tone, terminology).
Suggest improvements to enhance readability and accessibility.- Avoid suggenting new changes after applying fixes requested by you.
Suggest improvements on the first review only.
Files:
source/instructors/getstarted/support/changelog.rstsource/instructors/setupcourses/common-storage.rst
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.coderabbit.yaml (1)
19-37: Configuration changes align with schema and PR objectives.The additions to
path_instructions(lines 29–30) andfinishing_touches.docstrings(lines 36–37) are valid per the CodeRabbit configuration schema:
- The RST path instructions are properly structured as a string within the
path_instructionsarray.- Disabling docstrings in
finishing_touchesis a valid boolean configuration that aligns with the PR's documentation tooling updates..github/workflows/deploy.yaml (1)
13-13: Dependency and action updates are well-aligned with PR objectives.The removal of
recommonmarkand addition ofsphinx_designare consistent with the documentation tooling changes. The checkout action upgrade from v1 to v4 is a standard security and performance improvement practice.Also applies to: 16-16
README.md (1)
11-11: Installation instructions correctly updated to match workflow changes.The pip install command is consistent with the updated dependencies in the deployment workflow.
source/instructors/setupcourses/common-storage.rst (2)
7-9: Title and introductory text are now grammatically correct and clear.The title correctly uses singular "Courses" (no article mismatch), and the opening sentence is now properly structured with correct spelling ("securely" instead of "securily").
Also applies to: 11-11
21-62: Documentation expansion is well-structured with clear instructions and proper RST formatting.The new "Using Common Storage" section provides comprehensive step-by-step guidance with properly formatted subsections, images with descriptive alt text, and caution/note blocks. All past formatting issues (alt text articles, directive indentation) have been corrected. The content is accessible and organized logically for instructors.
source/instructors/getstarted/support/changelog.rst (1)
20-21: Changelog entries are well-formatted and consistent.The two new October 2025 entries follow the established changelog format with correct date ordinals (21st, 20th) and appropriate cross-references to the new Common Storage and Math Blocks documentation features.
Please verify that the
:ref:math-blocks`` reference resolves to the corresponding documentation section added in this PR.
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Chores