Show hidden#268
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…ootstrapper updated paket bootstrapper
Short name not preferred? Go with long! No short name? Has to be long!
Update UnParserExtensions.cs
If there is no long name, take the short name regardless of the preference setting
ericnewton76
approved these changes
Apr 4, 2018
Member
ericnewton76
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
looks good. thanks for the contribution
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently, the UnParser returns a command line with hidden options exposed. I believe that this is wrong. This pull request changes that behavior:
Of course, for any users expecting hidden options to be exposed by the unparser, this would be considered a breaking change. If that is unacceptable, it is a small thing to change the option to "hideHidden" to reverse the behavior.