fix: separate lens ethflow contract address

[alfetopito]

Description

Split ethflow contract address table to be explicit the Lens address is not the same as other chains

https://docs.cow.fi/cow-protocol/reference/contracts/periphery previously showed only a single address for all chains, despite the network link pointing to a different one

Changes

• Now it should have new entries for Lens: https://docs-git-fix-lens-ethflow-contract-cowswap.vercel.app/cow-protocol/reference/contracts/periphery

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Updated (UTC)
docs	Ready	Preview	Oct 16, 2025 9:53am

[alfetopito]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The periphery contracts documentation table is restructured to explicitly segment deployment environments by network coverage. Production and Staging environments are each split into "most chains" and "Lens" categories, relabeling existing addresses to clarify their network scope without changing the underlying values.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation table restructure docs/cow-protocol/reference/contracts/periphery/README.mdx	Environment deployment table rewritten from 2 rows (Production, Staging) to 4 rows, adding explicit network-coverage labels (most chains vs. Lens) for each environment tier while preserving address values

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• cowprotocol/docs#538: Modifies the same periphery contracts README deployment table to add Lens-specific entries and clarify network coverage through similar restructuring.

Suggested reviewers

• pretf00d
• fhenneke

Poem

📚✨ A rabbit hops through docs so fine,
Rearranging rows in perfect line,
Production, staging—now split with care,
Lens and chains both labeled there! 🐰

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title Check	✅ Passed	The title succinctly captures the primary change by indicating that the Lens-specific ETHFlow contract address has been separated, aligning directly with the modifications made to the periphery README table. It is concise, clear, and focused on the main update without extraneous detail.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
Description Check	✅ Passed	The pull request description includes the required Description and Changes sections from the template. The Description section clearly explains the issue: the ethflow contract address table previously showed only a single address for all chains despite the network link pointing to a different Lens address. The Changes section includes a checkbox item with evidence (screenshots) showing the fix adds new entries for Lens. While the Related Issues section is not included, it appears to be optional based on the template's commented-out format, and the description provides sufficient context and rationale for the change.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/lens-ethflow-contract

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[fedgiac]

I suggest to use #543 instead to also update the warnings.

[fedgiac]

Approving anyway, the changes look good and I'm happier to merge this if it makes the changes go out faster. 🙂

[alfetopito]

I suggest to use #543 instead to also update the warnings.

Sorry I was not aware you created a PR before me.
Closing in favour of that one.