Skip to content

fix TestDeepPotAPBCExcludeTypes#2680

Merged
wanghan-iapcm merged 1 commit intodeepmodeling:develfrom
njzjz:fix-TestDeepPotAPBCExcludeTypes
Jul 15, 2023
Merged

fix TestDeepPotAPBCExcludeTypes#2680
wanghan-iapcm merged 1 commit intodeepmodeling:develfrom
njzjz:fix-TestDeepPotAPBCExcludeTypes

Conversation

@njzjz
Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented Jul 15, 2023

I found that #956 broke this unit test, making it only testing a standard model.

I found that deepmodeling#956 broke this unit test. It only tested a normal model.

Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@rutgers.edu>
@njzjz njzjz requested a review from denghuilu July 15, 2023 00:20
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 15, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: +0.01 🎉

Comparison is base (3a5f7cf) 78.36% compared to head (a8b62c7) 78.37%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #2680      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.36%   78.37%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         235      235              
  Lines       24488    24497       +9     
  Branches     1469     1469              
==========================================
+ Hits        19189    19200      +11     
+ Misses       4909     4905       -4     
- Partials      390      392       +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
source/api_cc/src/common.cc 79.18% <100.00%> (+0.38%) ⬆️

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm merged commit 1a4f51f into deepmodeling:devel Jul 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants