Update Vibe.d to v0.9.0 in test_registry & dub init#1994
Update Vibe.d to v0.9.0 in test_registry & dub init#1994wilzbach merged 2 commits intodlang:masterfrom
dub init#1994Conversation
|
Thanks for your pull request, @Geod24! |
|
@Geod24 do you have commit access to dub as well? |
|
Thanks for the info, added an extra commit. Yes I have push access but I'm sure someone will be able to review this today. |
|
Didn't realize we were already in dub repo heh -- thanks for adding the extra commit to the PR |
dub init
WebFreak001
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think ~>0.x is bad because major v0 versions may introduce breaking changes with minor updates. Even though vibe.d already acts pretty stable like a v1 version, I think it would be a bad practice promoting ~>0.x.
Once vibe.d goes 1.x I would be all for ~>1.x though
|
Ah but it shouldn't end in the |
|
even if it's a new repo, new vibe.d updates will be released with the code that was once written based on this generated The |
That's not quite true:
The argument for not having |
|
Regarding the ctrl+c issue of vibe-d (still reproducible with vibe-d 0.9.0 according to a user in the dlang forum), what do you think about defaulting |
Yes, but in practice patch releases are more stable. Anyhow, I don't really think it matters and 0.9 means that we don't have to update dub constantly (or won't break when it can't be updated). |
It would take months for most users to update to the newest dub release (the next release this could be in is 1.11). And no one immediately updates their compiler, so I would say at least half a year until this has an impact on beginners. Furthermore, I think they would be confused because tutorials don't mention the version flag. |
|
So what do I do with this PR ? |
Needed for dlang/phobos#7545