-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
Determinism changes. #255
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
erozenfeld
merged 1 commit into
dotnet:master
from
erozenfeld:GetCurrentProcessorIdDeterminism
Mar 20, 2020
Merged
Determinism changes. #255
erozenfeld
merged 1 commit into
dotnet:master
from
erozenfeld:GetCurrentProcessorIdDeterminism
Mar 20, 2020
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1. The timer workaround is no longer needed since EventPipe file polling was removed in dotnet/coreclr#24225 2. dotnet/runtime#467 introduced a change that causes pmi non determinism. System.Threading.Thread.s_isProcessorNumberReallyFast can have different values on two invocations of the process on the same machine. (https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/aedf8f52006619ef5d4eca65d79f42cc4b7bc402/src/coreclr/src/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/Threading/Thread.CoreCLR.cs#L502) That causes non-determinism in generated code in methods' inlining System.Threading.Thread.GetCurrentProcessorId() (https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/aedf8f52006619ef5d4eca65d79f42cc4b7bc402/src/coreclr/src/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/Threading/Thread.CoreCLR.cs#L492-L498) The workaround is to set the value of System.Threading.Thread.s_isProcessorNumberReallyFast to true via reflection.
Member
Author
|
@AndyAyersMS @sandreenko @dotnet/jit-contrib PTAL |
AndyAyersMS
approved these changes
Mar 20, 2020
Member
AndyAyersMS
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
sandreenko
approved these changes
Mar 20, 2020
BruceForstall
approved these changes
Mar 20, 2020
erozenfeld
added a commit
to erozenfeld/jitutils
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
I added a workaround for disassembly non-determinism in dotnet#255. See dotnet#255 for details of what causes the non-determinism. It turns it relied on a reflection hole that allowed init-only static fields to be modified after static constructor has been called. That hole was fixed in dotnet/runtime#37849 so the workaround is no longer valid and causes an exception from pmi. I don't see a way to work around the non-determinism without changing framework code so for now I'm just reverting the workaround. Unfortunately, that means that we can get non-deterministic disassembly for any method that inlines System.Threading.Thread.GetCurrentProcessorId. Fixes dotnet#271.
erozenfeld
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2020
I added a workaround for disassembly non-determinism in #255. See #255 for details of what causes the non-determinism. It turns it relied on a reflection hole that allowed init-only static fields to be modified after static constructor has been called. That hole was fixed in dotnet/runtime#37849 so the workaround is no longer valid and causes an exception from pmi. I don't see a way to work around the non-determinism without changing framework code so for now I'm just reverting the workaround. Unfortunately, that means that we can get non-deterministic disassembly for any method that inlines System.Threading.Thread.GetCurrentProcessorId. Fixes #271.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The timer workaround is no longer needed since EventPipe file polling
was removed in Removing EventPipe file polling (EventPipeController+Timer) coreclr#24225
Adjusting
GetCurrentProcessorIdcaching to different environments. runtime#467 introduced a change thatcauses pmi non-determinism.
System.Threading.Thread.s_isProcessorNumberReallyFast can have different
values on two invocations of the process on the same machine.
(https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/aedf8f52006619ef5d4eca65d79f42cc4b7bc402/src/coreclr/src/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/Threading/Thread.CoreCLR.cs#L502)
That causes non-determinism in generated code in methods
inlining System.Threading.Thread.GetCurrentProcessorId()
(https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/aedf8f52006619ef5d4eca65d79f42cc4b7bc402/src/coreclr/src/System.Private.CoreLib/src/System/Threading/Thread.CoreCLR.cs#L492-L498)
The workaround is to set the value of
System.Threading.Thread.s_isProcessorNumberReallyFast to true via
reflection.